Please wait a minute...
北京第二外国语学院学报  2016, Vol. 38 Issue (3): 19-30    DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.2016.029
语言学研究     
习近平主席“一带一路”话语创新实践案例研究
刘立华 徐硕
刘立华,北京交通大学
徐硕,北京交通大学
A Case Study of President Xi Jinping’s Discourse Practice of The Belt and Road
LIU Lihua / XU Shuo
Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
 全文: PDF(705 KB)   [HTML]()
摘要: 自国家主席习近平2013年提出共建“一带一路”重大倡议以来,他多次在国际演讲中深入阐释“一带一路”的深刻内涵和积极意义。该文以习近平主席有关“一带一路”的对外演讲为研究对象,从话语理论的角度对习近平主席的话语实践进行了深入的探讨。研究表明,习近平主席的话语实践表达了一种的新的话语理念,其话语主题分别表现为“共创”、“携手”、“合作”和“共同体”;习近平主席的话语实践成功地运用了“列数据”、“讲故事”、“引名言”、“谈自己”等话语模式,极大地增强了话语信息传递的效力。同时,习近平主席关于“一带一路”的话语实践对中国国际形象的建构与提升具有重要意义,同时也是我国话语权提升的案例典范。
关键词: “一带一路”话语权力话语实践话语策略话语分析话语模式对外宣传    
Abstract: Chinese President Xi Jinping put forward The Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road during his overseas visits in 2013. Thereafter he illustrated the essence and significance of The Belt and Road in many international speeches. Focusing on this kind of discourse practice, this study aims to do a thorough and detailed analysis of these five international speeches from a discourse perspective. It is found in this research that “cooperation” is the main theme in President Xi Jinping’s discourse, and President Xi has employed subject terms such as “co-creating”, “hand in hand”, “community” and “working with” to express the essence of “the Belt and Road” in the world stage. The discourse strategies manifested in President Xi’s speeches mainly include “listing data and figures”, “story-telling”, “using quotations” and “telling personal experience”, which have greatly enhanced the communication effect and fit well with China’s status and positions in the world. Meanwhile, the discourse practice of these international speeches on the topic of The Belt and Road is significant and beneficial for President Xi’s positive international image and China’s image promotion. The discourse practice of Chinese President Xi Jinping on the topic of the Belt and Road is also a successful case of China’s international construction of discourse power.
Key words: The Belt and Road    discourse power    discourse practice    discourse strategy    discourse analysis    discourse mode    international publicity
收稿日期: 2016-04-08 出版日期: 2018-03-20
PACS:  H030  
基金资助: 本文系国家社科基金项目“中国对外传播话语模式研究”(项目编号:13BXW031)阶段性成果。
作者简介: 刘立华,北京交通大学教授,100044,研究方向:话语研究、跨文化传播、系统功能语言学。电子邮箱:llihua08@163.com 徐硕,北京交通大学,100044,研究方向:外国语言文学。
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
刘立华 徐硕

引用本文:

刘立华 徐硕. 习近平主席“一带一路”话语创新实践案例研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2016, 38(3): 19-30.

LIU Lihua / XU Shuo. A Case Study of President Xi Jinping’s Discourse Practice of The Belt and Road. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2016, 38(3): 19-30.

链接本文:

https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/10.12002/j.bisu.2016.029        https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2016/V38/I3/19

[1]Blommaert,J. Discourse:A Critical Introduction[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005.
[2]Caldas-Coulthard,C. From discourse analysis to critical discourse analysis:The differential re-presentation of women and men speaking in written news[A]. In J. M. Sinclair,M. Hoey and G. Fox(Eds.). Techniques of Description:Spoken and Written Discourse[C]. London:Routledge,1993:196—208.
[3]Cadas-Coulthard,C. R. & M. Coulthard. Texts and Practices:Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis[C]. London and New York:Routledge,1996.
[4]Chouliaraki,L & N. Fairclough. Discourse in Late Modernity:Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis[M]. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press,1999.
[5]Fairclough,N. Analysing Discourse:Textual Analysis for Social Research[M]. London and New York:Routledge,2003.
[6] Martin,D. C. The choices of identity[J]. Social Identities,1995(1):5—16.
[7]Martin,J. R. Close reading:functional linguistics as a tool for critical analysis[A]. In L. Unsworth(Ed.)Researching Language in Schools and Communities:functional linguistics approaches[C]. London:Cassell,2000:275—303.
[8]van Dijk,T. A. Discourse and Knowledge:A Sociocognitive Approach[M]. London:Cambridge University Press,2014.
[9]Wodak,R. et al. The Discursive Construction of National Identity[M]. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press,1999.
[10] Wodak,R. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis[M]. New York:Sage Publications,2001.
[11]刘立华. 中美官方话语传播对话性空间建构研究[J].现代传播,2012(7):40—44.
[12]刘立华. 新一届领导集体话语创新案例研究[J].对外传播,2014(10):41—43.
[13]刘立华. 话语理论的进展:兼评《话语理论与批评媒介政治学》[J]. 国外理论动态,2016(2):135—143.
[14]韦红.东南亚五国民族问题研究(第一版)[M]. 北京:民族出版社,2003.
[1] 田海龙. 批评话语分析的一种标杆性尝试——《“学雷锋活动”历史变迁的话语研究》评介[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2018, 40(6): 103-109.
[2] 刘宁. 基于语料库的中美媒体关于中国雾霾报道的对比研究 ——以批评话语分析为视角[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2018, 40(5): 37-53.
[3] 杨阳. 系统功能视角下新闻报道的生态话语分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2018, 40(1): 33-45.