译者行为的认知翻译学观

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.532

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

如何界定译者行为?能否基于某一理论或范式，形成具有可操作性的分析框架，通过系统性研究生成新知?本文尝试从认知翻译学的视角对这些问题作初步的思考，具体探讨译者行为概念的层次、具身属性和分析范畴，阐释译者行为认知研究区别于传统研究的特征和维度，进一步明确译者行为认知研究的目标、维度、问题和方法。

关键词: 译者行为; 具身性; 认知翻译学; 可操作性

Abstract:

How can translator behavior/act be well defined? Can we develop an operable analytical framework of translator behavior/act, based on a certain theory or paradigm, to produce new knowledge through systematic research? This study provides a preliminary reflection on these questions from the perspective of Cognitive Translatology. Speciﬁcally, it explores the levels and embodied attributes of translator behavior/act to further clarify the goals, dimensions, problems, analytical categories and methods of cognitive research on translator behavior/act, and to identify the aspects that distinguish the embodied cognitive approach from previous studies.

Keywords: translator behavior/act; embodiment; cognitive translatology; operability

中图分类号:

H059/H315.9

谭业升. 译者行为的认知翻译学观[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(4): 83-100.

Tan Yesheng. Translator Behavior/Act from the Perspective of Cognitive Translatology[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2024, 46(4): 83-100.

图/表 1

参考文献 37

[1]	BEDNAREK M. Emotion Talk Across Corpora[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[2]	BOURDIEU P. Intellectual field and creative project[J]. Social Science Information, 1969(2):89-119.
[3]	BOURDIEU P. Outline of a Theory of Practice[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1977.
[4]	DIONÍSIO DA SILVA G & RADICIONI M. Recharting Territories: Intradisciplinarity in Translation Studies[M]. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2022.
[5]	DOWTY D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection[J]. Language, 1991(3):547-619.
[6]	FAUCONNIER G. Methods and generalizations[C]//JANSSEN T & REDEKER G. Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,1999: 95-128.
[7]	HALVERSON S L. Conceptual work and the “translation” concept[J]. Target, 1999(1):1-31.
[8]	HALVERSON S L. Reorienting translation studies: Cognitive approaches and the centrality of the translator[C]//HOUSE J. Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan,2014:116-139.
[9]	KÖVECSES Z & PALMER G B. Language and emotion concepts: What experientialists and social constructionists have in common[C]//PALMER G B & OCCHI D J. Languages of Sentiment: Cultural Constructions of Emotional Substrates. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,1999:237-262.
[10]	LAKOFF G & JOHNSON M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought[M]. New York: Basic Books,1999.
[11]	MO Yan. Life and Death are Wearing Me Out[M]. GOLDBLATT H(Trans.). New York: Arcade Publishing Inc., 2008.
[12]	MUÑOZ MARTÍN R. Looking toward the future of cognitive translation studies[C]//SCHWIETER J W & FERREIRA A. The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,Inc.,2017:555-572.
[13]	DE OLIVEIRA R P & DE SOUZA BITTENCOURT R. An Interview with Mark John and Tim Rohrer: From Neurons to Sociocultural Situatedness[C] //FRANK R M,DIRVEN R,ZIEMKE T,et al. Body, Language and Mind Volume 2: Sociocultural Situatedness[M]. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2008:21-48.
[14]	OLOHAN M. Translation and Practice Theory[M]. London:Routledge, 2020.
[15]	RISKU H. Translation process research as interaction research: From mental to socio-cognitive processes[J]. MonTI Special Issue — Minding Translation, 2014(1):331-353.
[16]	RISKU H & WINDHAGER F. Extended translation: A sociocognitive research agenda[J]. Target, 2013(1):33-45.
[17]	ROBINSON D. The Translator’s Turn[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,1991.
[18]	ROJO A. The role of emotions[C]//SCHWIETER J & FERREIRA A. The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,Inc.,2017:369-385.
[19]	SIMEONI D. The pivotal status of the translator’s habitus[J]. Target, 1998(1):1-39.
[20]	WANG Anyi. The Song of Everlasting Sorrow: A Novel of Shanghai[M]. BERRY M & EGAN S C( Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
[21]	WANG Anyi. The Song of Everlasting Sorrow: A Novel of Shanghai[M]. EGAN S C(Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.
[22]	WOLF M. The sociology of translation and its “activist turn”[J]. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 2012(2):129-143.
[23]	白亚仁. 略谈文学接受的文化差异及翻译策略[EB/OL].(2014-08-26)[2016-12-08]. http://www.chinawriter.com.cn/2014/2014-08-26/215845.html.
[24]	骆传伟, 肖娇. 汉语主语类型对汉英视译难度影响的眼动研究[J]. 外国语, 2022(6):34-44.
[25]	吕微. 民俗学:一门伟大的学科——从学术反思到实践科学的历史与逻辑研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2015.
[26]	莫言. 生死疲劳[M]. 台北: 麦田出版, 2006.
[27]	谭业升. 认知翻译学探索:创造性翻译的认知路径与认知制约[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2012.
[28]	谭业升. 译者的双语隐喻表征与创造性翻译[J]. 外国语言文学, 2014(4):247-255,286.
[29]	谭业升. 翻译认知过程研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2020.
[30]	谭业升. 认知翻译学对翻译研究的重新定位[J]. 中国外语, 2021(3):79-87.
[31]	谭业升. 英美汉学家译者的多重声音:一项基于广义翻译思维报告的认知翻译学研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2022.
[32]	王安忆. 长恨歌[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 2004.
[33]	王克非. 翻译文化史论[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社,1997.
[34]	于莉英, 武晓群, 王旭东. 个体化治疗——中西医结合的切入点[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2011(12):2784-2786.
[35]	周领顺. 译者行为批评“行为 - 社会视域”评价系统[J]. 上海翻译, 2022(5):1-7.
[36]	周领顺. 译者行为批评理论及其应用问题——答研究者(之一)[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023(4):6-23.
[37]	周领顺, 黄鹂鸣, 陈龙宇. 译者行为批评理论的称谓问题——答研究者(之四)[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024(3):15-29.