法治的多模态建构：反腐公益广告的语类分析

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.382

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

一个现代国家必须是法治国家,如何提高全社会的法治意识是当前我国司法改革所面临的重要问题之一。本研究采用系统功能多模态语篇分析框架,融合语类和多模态评价分析,探讨法治在多模态语篇中的建构。通过对语类结构和语域变量的分析,本研究发现反腐公益广告中均包含“叙事”“评价”“泛化”3个必要阶段,并识别出轶事文、说教文和观察文3个子语类,它们分别建构了法的至高无上性、强制性和道德性。本文旨在为法治理念的传播提供新的视角,并为反腐和法治宣传材料的制作提供参考。

关键词: 法治; 多模态; 反腐公益广告; 语类分析

Abstract:

The question of how to raise legal awareness and cultivate a belief in the rule of law has been a vital issue that ongoing judicial reform in China must address. Focusing on multimodal anticorruption discourse, the present study seeks to investigate the process of how legal ideology concerning the rule of law is represented and transmitted through various semiotic resources. On the basis of a systematic functional multimodal discourse analysis and a Sydney approach to genre analysis and appraisal analysis, the present research explores the generic structure and register variables distributed in anticorruption public service advertisements (APSAs). The present study identifies three subgenres of APSAs and their respective generic structures. This research aims to provide linguistic references for the production of multimodal anticorruption discourse and thus contributes to the implementation of rule of law in the country.

Keywords: rule of law; multimodality; anticorruption public service advertisements; genre analysis

中图分类号:

H030

刘玉洁, 袁传有. 法治的多模态建构：反腐公益广告的语类分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(2): 51-65.

Liu Yujie, Yuan Chuanyou. Multimodal Construction of the “Rule of Law”: A Genre Analysis of Anticorruption Public Service Advertisements[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2022, 44(2): 51-65.

图/表 10

参考文献 37

[1]	Bateman J, & Schmidt K H. Multimodal Film Analysis[M]. London: Routledge, 2012.
[2]	Bruner J. The Culture of Education[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.
[3]	Economou D. Photos in the News:Appraisal Analysis of Visual Semiosis and Verbal-Visual Intersemiosis[D]. Sydney:University of Sydney, 2009.
[4]	Giannetti L. Understanding Movies[M]. 13^th Ed. Boston: Pearson, 2013.
[5]	Halliday M A K. Language as Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
[6]	Hood S. Body language in face-to-face teaching:A focus on textual and interpersonal meaning[C]// Dreyfus S,Hood S & Stenglin M. Semiotic Margins:Meaning in Multimodalities. London:Continuum, 2011:31-52.
[7]	Iedema R. Analysing film and television:A social semiotic account of hospital:An unhealthy business[C]// van Leeuwen T & Jewitt C. Handbook of Visual Analysis. London:Sage Publications, 2001:183-206.
[8]	Jewitt C. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis[M]. London: Routledge, 2009.
[9]	Joffe H. The power of visual material:Persuasion,emotion and identification[J]. Diogenes, 2008, 55(1):84-93. DOI URL
[10]	Kress G. Multimodality:A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication[M]. London: Routledge, 2010.
[11]	Kress G, & van Leeuwen T. Reading Images:The Grammar of Visual Design[M]. New York: Routledge, 2006.
[12]	Labov W, & Waletzky J. Narrative analysis:Oral versions of personal experience[C]//Helm J. Essays on the Verbal and the Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1967:12-44.
[13]	Macken-Horarik M. Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative[J]. Text, 2003, 23(2):285-312.
[14]	Martin J R. Register and genre:Modelling social context in functional linguistics-narrative genres[C]// Pedro E. Discourse Analysis:Proceedings of First International Conference on Discourse Analysis. Lisbon:Portuguese Linguistics Association, 1997:305-344.
[15]	Martin J R. A context for genre:Modelling social processes in functional linguistics[C]//Stainton R & Devilliers J. Communication in Linguistics. Toronto: Gref Publishers, 2001:287-327.
[16]	Martin J R, & Rose D. Genre Relations:Mapping Culture[M]. London: Equinox Pub., 2008.
[17]	Martin J R, & White P R R. The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[18]	Neumann S. Contrastive Register Variation:A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013.
[19]	O’Halloran K L. Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis(SF-MDA):Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery[J]. Visual Communication, 2008, 7(4): 443-475. DOI URL
[20]	Painter C, Martin J R, & Unsworth L. Reading Visual Narratives:Image Analysis of Children’s Picture Books[M]. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd., 2013.
[21]	Rose D. Reading genre:A new wave of analysis[J]. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2006, 2(2):185-204.
[22]	Unsworth L. Persuasive narratives:Evaluative images in picture books and animated movies[J]. Visual Communication, 2015, 14(1):73-96. DOI URL
[23]	Ventola E. The Structure of Social Interaction:A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounter[M]. London: Frances Printer, 1988.
[24]	Yuan Chuanyou. A battlefield or a lecture hall?A contrastive multimodal discourse analysis of courtroom trials[J]. Social Semiotics, 2019, 29(5):645-669. DOI URL
[25]	丁建新. 体裁分析的传统与前沿[J]. 外语研究, 2007(6):13-18.
[26]	冯德正. 多模态语篇分析的基本问题探讨[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2017, 39(3):1-11.
[27]	刘捷. 从传统文化中的“廉”看当代廉政建设的话语基础[J]. 领导科学, 2016(5):8-11.
[28]	刘银, 杨文彬. 反腐倡廉公益平面广告中的多模态隐喻和转喻[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2017, 39(6):40-56.
[29]	王人博, 程燎原. 法治论[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2014.
[30]	王永杰. 从独语到对话--论当代中国法制宣传的转型[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版), 2007(4):124-132.
[31]	亚里士多德. 政治学[M]. 吴寿彭,译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997.
[32]	于琴. 当代中国廉政话语建设研究--以十八大以来《人民日报》头版廉政报道为例[J]. 社会发展研究, 2017, 4(1):182-194,245.
[33]	袁传有. 警察讯问语言的人际意义--评价理论之“介入系统”视角[J]. 现代外语, 2008, 31(2):141-149.
[34]	约瑟夫·拉兹. 法律的权威[M]. 朱峰,译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2005.
[35]	张德禄. 马丁的语类研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010(10):29-34,63.
[36]	张辛未, 赵秀凤. 反腐政治漫画中的多模态转喻和隐喻研究[J]. 外语学界, 2016, 4:36-44.
[37]	张志铭, 于浩. 现代法治释义[J]. 政法论丛, 2015(1):3-9.

序号	层级	描述
1	镜头	未经剪辑的连续拍摄图像
2	场景	在同一时间和空间中拍摄的不同镜头
3	小段	构成叙事要素的一系列场景
4	阶段	叙事阶段由小段组成,用于预测故事发展

序号	层级	描述
1	镜头	未经剪辑的连续拍摄图像
2	场景	在同一时间和空间中拍摄的不同镜头
3	小段	构成叙事要素的一系列场景
4	阶段	叙事阶段由小段组成,用于预测故事发展

子语类	事件	评价	泛化
轶事文	事件描述	情感反应	命令
说教文	事件描述	判断阐释	劝诫
观察文	事件描述	鉴赏评论	号召

子语类	事件	评价	泛化
轶事文	事件描述	情感反应	命令
说教文	事件描述	判断阐释	劝诫
观察文	事件描述	鉴赏评论	号召