论戴维森隐喻观中的维特根斯坦语言哲学渊源

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.278

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文以戴维森的《论隐喻的含意》以及维特根斯坦代表性哲学文本为研究对象,以文本分析为研究方法,考察戴维森隐喻观中的维特根斯坦语言哲学渊源,发现戴维森隐喻观中的维特根斯坦思想渊源体现在四个方面：（1）戴维森对隐喻意义和隐喻使用的“划界”思想跟维特根斯坦对“可说”和“不可说”的“划界”观存在关联;（2）戴维森把隐喻意义的理解纳入隐喻使用范畴,这跟后期维特根斯坦语义思想一致;（3）戴维森对隐喻“认知意义”的批判跟维特根斯坦有关“感觉内部对应物”的批判都是“反心理主义”;（4）戴维森和维特根斯坦都认为理解隐喻的意义是一种哲学“洞见”。对隐喻意义的把握始终要基于隐喻的具体使用语境。

关键词: 隐喻; 隐喻意义; 隐喻使用; 戴维森; 维特根斯坦; 认知意义; 语言哲学

Abstract:

This paper investigates Ludwig Wittgenstein’s influence on Donald Davidson’s thoughts in “What Metaphors Mean”. By analysing Davidson’s and Wittgenstein’s key philosophical writings, we argue that such influence can be generalised into four points: (1) there is a connection between Davidson’s division of metaphor’s meaning from its application and Wittgenstein’s demarcation of the “sayable” and “unsayable” in his Tractatus; (2) Davidson’s idea of categorising the understanding of the meaning of metaphor into the realm of metaphor’s actual application is in accordance with Wittgenstein’s later views on semantics; (3) the essential argument behind Davidson’s refutation of the conception of metaphor’s “cognitive meaning” and Wittgenstein’s critique of “the inner-object conception of sensations” is “anti-mentalism”; and (4) both Davidson and Wittgenstein thought that the interpretation of the meaning of language (metaphor) can be regarded as an “insight” in philosophy. All in all, “metaphorical meaning” and “cognitive meaning” are empty concepts, and the interpretation of metaphor’s meaning should always be placed in the specific context where metaphor occurs.

Keywords: metaphor; metaphorical meaning; application of metaphor; Davidson; Wittgenstein; cognitive meaning; linguistic philosophy

中图分类号:

B561

徐强. 论戴维森隐喻观中的维特根斯坦语言哲学渊源[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(2): 104-118.

Qiang Xu. Metaphorical Meaning：Davidson and Wittgenstein[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2020, 42(2): 104-118.

参考文献 35

[1]	Black M. How metaphors work:A reply to Donald Davidson[J]. Critical Inquiry 1979,6(1):131~143. DOI URL
[2]	Booth W C. Ten literal “theses”[J]. Critical Inquiry 1978,5(1):175~176. DOI URL
[3]	Cohen T. Metaphor and the cultivation of intimacy[J]. Critical Inquiry 1978,5(1):3~12. DOI URL
[4]	Crosthwaite J. The meaning of metaphors[J]. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1985,63(3):320~335.
[5]	Davidson D. Reply to Oliver Scholz[M]//Stoecker R. Reflecting Davidson: Donald Davidson Responding to an International Forum of Philosophers. Berlin:W. de Gruyter, 1993: 172~175.
[6]	Davies M. V—Idiom and metaphor[J]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1983,83(1):67~86.
[7]	Goodman N. Metaphor as moonlighting[J]. Critical Inquiry 1979,6(1):125~130.
[8]	Harries K. The many uses of metaphor[J]. Critical Inquiry 1978,5(1):167~174.
[9]	Hesse M. Unfamiliar noises[J]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1987,61(1):301~311.
[10]	Kittay E F. Metaphor as rearranging the furniture of the mind:A reply to Donald Davidson’s “What metaphors mean”[M]// Radman Z. From A Metaphorical Point of View: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor. Berlin:W. de Gruyter, 1995: 73~116.
[11]	Kotzé B. Why metaphors have no meaning:Considering metaphoric meaning in Davidson[J]. South African Journal of Philosophy 2001,20(3~4) : 291~308.
[12]	McGuire J M. Davidson on metaphorical meaning:A reply to Stainton[J]. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue Canadienne de Philosophie, 2003,42(2):355~362.
[13]	McGuire J M. Davidson on meaning and metaphor:Reply to Rahat[J]. Philosophia 2004,31(3):543~556.
[14]	Moran R. Seeing and believing:Metaphor,image,and force[J]. Critical Inquiry 1989,16(1):87~112.
[15]	Novitz D. Metaphor,Derrida,and Davidson[J]. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 1985,44(2):101~114. DOI URL
[16]	Robinson R C. Causation as metaphor—A catachresis[J]. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 2011,3(1):181~190.
[17]	Rorty R. Unfamiliar noises[J]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1987,61(1):283~311.
[18]	Scholz O R. “What metaphors mean” and how metaphors refer[M]// Stoecker R. Reflecting Davidson: Donald Davidson Responding to an International Forum of Philosophers. Berlin:W. de Gruyter, 1993: 161~171.
[19]	Schroeder S. Wittgenstein：The Way Out of the Fly-Bottle[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.
[20]	Stern J. What metaphors do not mean[J]. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1991,16(1):13~52.
[21]	Swanson D R. Toward a psychology of metaphor[J]. Critical Inquiry 1978,5(1):163~166.
[22]	Waismann F. How I See Philosophy[M]. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1968.
[23]	Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations[M]. 4th ed. Chichester: Blackwell, 2009.
[24]	Wittgenstein L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus[M]. Joseph M A(Ed.). Peterborough: Broadview, 2014.
[25]	陈嘉映. 说隐喻[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2002,34(6):3~17.
[26]	陈嘉映. 说理[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2011: 46~69.
[27]	戴维森. 隐喻的含意[M]// 马蒂尼奇.语言哲学.牟博,杨音莱,韩林合等译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1998a: 843~870.
[28]	戴维森. 真理与意义[M]// 马蒂尼奇.语言哲学.牟博,杨音莱,韩林合等译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1998b: 127~152.
[29]	林书武. 国外隐喻研究综述[J]. 外语教学与研究, 1997(1):14~22.
[30]	维特根斯坦. 逻辑哲学论[M].贺绍甲译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005.
[31]	维特根斯坦. 哲学研究[M].韩林合译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015.
[32]	徐强. 魏斯曼论“实指定义”[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2016,32(4):3~8.
[33]	徐强. 对维也纳小组在1930年代有关维特根斯坦哲学理解的微观考察[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2018,40(9):129~137.
[34]	严苡丹. 对戴维森隐喻理论的评述[J]. 理论界, 2010(12):165~166.
[35]	张瑛. 论非认知主义隐喻观——从戴维森到勒珀和斯通[J]. 世界哲学, 2014(3):52~58.