批评话语分析的认知心理学基础

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.527

北京第二外国语学院学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 16-28.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.527

批评话语分析的认知心理学基础

辛斌¹(), 王永亮²()

1.南京师范大学外国语学院，210023
2.华北水利水电大学外国语学院，450046

出版日期:2024-08-30 发布日期:2024-10-18
作者简介:辛斌，南京师范大学外国语学院二级教授，博士生导师，210023，研究方向：语用学、篇章语义学、批评语言学。电子邮箱： 13770501252@163.com
王永亮，华北水利水电大学外国语学院，450046，研究方向：外语教学理论与实践、积极心理学与外语习得、外语教师发展。电子邮箱：Godfreyeducation@163.com
基金资助:
2016年度国家社会科学基金项目“中美关系危机话语的互文性和对话性比较研究”(16AYY021);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“跨文化传播视域下河南文化符号的挖掘与对外传播研究”(2021BXW007)

The Cognitive-Psychological Basis of Critical Discourse Analysis

Xin Bin¹(), Wang Yongliang²()

1. Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
2. North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China

Online:2024-08-30 Published:2024-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

进化心理学试图从人类对自然环境和社会环境适应性进化的角度阐释其思维方式与行为模式。以往批评话语分析的研究往往忽略了认知语言学和进化心理学的视角，导致在分析过程中存在一定的主观性和片面性。本文引入语用学与关联理论，并结合认知框架，试图分析这些理论在解释和解读阶段对批评话语分析的重要贡献。本文认为，认知语言学方法能够减少批评话语分析中的主观臆断性，提供更具阐释力的分析模型，从而提升话语分析的科学性和可靠性。我们认为，未来的批评话语分析应更多地关注受话者认知表征的建构，以验证进化心理学提出的心理模块或机制的合理性和有效性。

关键词: 批评话语分析; 进化心理学; 认知语言学; 语用学; 认知框架

Abstract:

Evolutionary psychology attempts to explain human thinking and behavioral patterns from the perspective of adaptive evolution in natural and social environments. Previous studies have largely overlooked the perspectives of cognitive linguistics and evolutionary psychology, resulting in subjectivity and bias in the analytical process. This study considers the nutrition of pragmatics and relevance theory, combined with cognitive frameworks, to analyze the significant contributions of these theories in explaining and interpreting critical discourse analysis (CDA). Cognitive linguistic methods can reduce the subjectivity in CDA by providing more explanatory models that enhance the scientific and reliable nature of discourse analyses. Future CDA should focus more on the construction of cognitive representations by the addressee to verify the rationality and validity of the psychological modules or mechanisms proposed in evolutionary psychology.

Keywords: critical discourse analysis; evolutionary psychology; cognitive linguistics; pragmatics; cognitive framework

中图分类号:

H030

辛斌, 王永亮. 批评话语分析的认知心理学基础[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(4): 16-28.

Xin Bin, Wang Yongliang. The Cognitive-Psychological Basis of Critical Discourse Analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2024, 46(4): 16-28.

参考文献 35

[1]	BARRETT L, DUNBAR R & LYCETT J Human Evolutionary Psychology[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
[2]	BRANDT P A. Cognitive Semiotics: Signs, Mind and Meaning[M]. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.
[3]	CAP P. Legitimization in Political Discourse[M]. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2006.
[4]	CAP P. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2008(1):17-41.
[5]	CHILTON P A. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice[M]. London:Routledge, 2004.
[6]	COSMIDES L & TOOBY J. Cognitive adaptations for social exchange[C]//BARKOW J H,COSMIDES L & TOOBY J. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press,1992:163-228.
[7]	GÄRDENFORS P. Cooperation and the evolution of symbolic communication[C]//OLLER D K & GRIEBEL U. Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach. Cambridge: MIT Press,2004:237-256.
[8]	GRICE H P. Logic and conversation[C]//COLE P & MORGAN J L. Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press,1975:41-58.
[9]	GRICE H P. Studies in the Way of Words[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1989.
[10]	HALLIDAY M A K & HASAN R. Cohesion in English[M]. London:Routledge,1976.
[11]	HART C. Critical discourse analysis and conceptualisation: Mental spaces, blended spaces and discourse spaces in the British National Party[C]//HART C & LUKEŠ D. Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2007:107-131.
[12]	HART C. Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework[J]. Critical Discourse Studies, 2008(2):91-106.
[13]	HART C. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
[14]	HART C. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives[M]. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.
[15]	ISENBERG N, SILBERSWEIG O, ENGELIEN A, et al. Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999(18):10456-10459.
[16]	LEDOUX J. The Emotional Brain[M]. New York: Simon & Schuster,1998.
[17]	O’HALLORAN K. Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003.
[18]	ORIGGI G & SPERBER D. Evolution, communication and the proper function of language[C]//CARRUTHERS P & CHAMBERLAIN A. Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2000:140-169.
[19]	PAOLUCCI C. Cognitive Semiotics: Integrating Signs, Minds, Meaning and Cognition[M]. Cham:Springer, 2021.
[20]	PINKER S. How the Mind Works[M]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company,1997.
[21]	REISIGL M & WODAK R. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism[M]. London:Routledge, 2000.
[22]	SCHALLER M, FAULKNER J, PARK H J, et al. Impressions of danger influence impressions of people: An evolutionary perspective on individual and collective cognition[J]. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 2004(3-4):231-247.
[23]	SCHALLER M & NEUBERG S L. Intergroup prejudices and intergroup conflicts[C]//CRAWFORD C & KREBS D. Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2008:401-414.
[24]	SPERBER D. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective[M]//SPERBER D. Metarepresentation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press,2000:117-138.
[25]	SPERBER D & WILSON D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell,1986.
[26]	ULBAEK I. The origin of language and cognition[C]//HURFORD J,STUDDERT-KENNEDY M S & KNIGHT M. Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1998:30-43.
[27]	VAN DIJK T A. Discourse and manipulation[J]. Discourse & Society, 2006(3):359-383.
[28]	VAN LEEUWEN T. The representation of social actors[C]//COLDAS-COULTHARD C R & COULTHARD M. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London:Routledge,1996: 32-70.
[29]	郭松. 批评话语分析:批评与进展[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019(4):34-47.
[30]	胡元江, 陈洁雯. 新闻语篇的趋近化共识建构——以《华尔街日报》中美贸易摩擦话语为例[J]. 外语研究, 2021(5):12-17.
[31]	刘文宇, 胡颖. 批评话语研究的语境 - 指称空间模型[J]. 现代外语, 2021(1):25-36.
[32]	宋健楠. 批评性话语阐释的合法化趋近视角[J]. 现代外语, 2019(4):475-486.
[33]	张辉. 批评认知语言学:语言理解与接受的分析视角——再论批评认知语言学的理论建构[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2021(3):31-43.
[34]	张辉. 批评认知语言学与主体间性[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023(1):30-49.
[35]	张辉, 杨艳琴. 批评认知语言学:理论基础与研究现状[J]. 外语教学, 2019(3):1-11.

批评话语分析的认知心理学基础

The Cognitive-Psychological Basis of Critical Discourse Analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘鹏. 趋近化理论视域下的危机话语研究——基于智利社会危机的案例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(4): 147-160.
[2]	胡佳蓓, 雷容. 新媒体时代的语用学研究——第十八届全国语用学研讨会综述[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(2): 95-103.
[3]	姚艳玲, 郭宇佳. 批评认知语言学视域下日美领导人政治演讲语篇话语策略对比研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(6): 21-35.
[4]	陈新仁, 何刚, 毛延生, 冉永平, 于国栋, 吴亚欣, 姜晖, 任伟, 谢朝群. 语用学研究前瞻[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(2): 137-148.
[5]	张辉. 批评认知语言学与主体间性[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(1): 30-49.
[6]	刘文宇, 徐博书. “容器”与“路径”——美国前副总统彭斯演讲的认知话语分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(1): 50-66.
[7]	刘小红, 侯国金. 双关何以为构式：词汇—构式语用学视角[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 148-162.
[8]	杨阳. 评价理论视角下对中美媒体关于新冠肺炎疫情报道的批评话语分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(5): 147-159.
[9]	王寅. 体认语言学的理论与实践——以体认参照点为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(3): 3-15.
[10]	田海龙, 单晓静. 政府部门通知中的权威及其话语建构[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(4): 24-35.
[11]	尤泽顺, 卓丽. 外交文化架构与对外政策构建：美国“新丝路战略”话语分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(4): 36-55.
[12]	王加林, 陈建平. 时间指示语与身份话语建构——基于回归前后香港施政报告的研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(4): 56-67.
[13]	梁娜,陈大亮. 认知语言学视角下的十九大报告政治隐喻翻译研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(3): 48-57.
[14]	郭松. 批评话语分析：批评与进展[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(4): 34-47.
[15]	田海龙. 批评话语分析的一种标杆性尝试——《“学雷锋活动”历史变迁的话语研究》评介[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2018, 40(6): 103-109.