文化历史活动理论、拓展性学习与革新实验室——芬兰赫尔辛基大学Yrjö Engeström教授访谈录

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.423

北京第二外国语学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 102-113.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.423

文化历史活动理论、拓展性学习与革新实验室——芬兰赫尔辛基大学Yrjö Engeström教授访谈录

阮晓蕾()

安徽大学外语学院, 合肥 230601

收稿日期:2019-10-16 出版日期:2022-12-30 发布日期:2023-01-10
作者简介:阮晓蕾，安徽大学外语学院，230601，研究方向：应用语言学、教育语言学。电子邮箱：ruanxiaolei@ahu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金教育学青年项目“新时代高校教师职业能动性生态化机制构建研究”的阶段性研究成果(CIA220286)

On Cultural-historical Activity Theory, Expansive Learning, and the Change Laboratory: An Interview with Professor Yrjö Engeström from the University of Helsinki

Ruan Xiaolei()

School of Foreign Studies, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China

Received:2019-10-16 Online:2022-12-30 Published:2023-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

教育研究的社会文化取向催生了学界对文化—历史活动理论以及其他相关概念的关注。为了更全面地理解活动理论、拓展性学习和革新实验室，笔者对芬兰赫尔辛基大学教育科学学院荣休教授Yrjö Engeström进行了访谈。在访谈中，Engeström教授首先阐述了文化历史活动理论的来源和发展路径，并解释了活动理论的阐释性和转化性。此外，他还厘清了活动理论、社会文化视野以及行动研究的关系，并介绍了一些较新的概念，如拓展性学习、转化能动性和革新实验室的干预方法。最后，Engeström教授展望了活动理论的发展趋势，表达了对全世界范围内青年学者的殷切期望，鼓励广大青年学者走进这一领域，开展有意义的研究。本次访谈聚焦了文化历史活动理论、相关概念及其应用，对外语教育研究的思考和实践具有一定的启示。

关键词: 文化历史活动理论; 拓展性学习; 革新实验室; 转化能动性

Abstract:

The burgeoning of educational research from a sociocultural perspective has fostered the spectacular expansion of scholarly interest in cultural-historical activity theory and other related concepts. This paper focuses on an interview with Professor Yrjö Engeström, who is Professor Emeritus of the Faculty of Educational Sciences at the University of Helsinki, to explore and enhance the understanding of activity theory, expansive learning, and the Change Laboratory. In this interview, Professor Engeström first illustrated the theoretical roots and developmental trajectories of cultural-historical activity theory before explaining the interpretive and transformative features of activity theory. In addition, he defined the relationships of activity theory, the sociocultural approach, and action research, and then elucidated several relatively new constructs, such as expansive learning, transformative agency, and the interventionist method of the Change Laboratory. Finally, Professor Engeström speculated on the future development of activity theory, and expressed his earnest hope for young scholars of the whole world to enter the research field and to conduct meaningful research. This interview examines cultural-historical activity theory, related concepts, and their applications; in doing so, it contributes to the existing body of research on activity theory and illuminates the thinking and practice in educational studies and foreign-language education research.

Keywords: cultural-historical activity theory; expansive learning; Change Laboratory; transformative agency

中图分类号:

H319.3

阮晓蕾. 文化历史活动理论、拓展性学习与革新实验室——芬兰赫尔辛基大学Yrjö Engeström教授访谈录[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 102-113.

Ruan Xiaolei. On Cultural-historical Activity Theory, Expansive Learning, and the Change Laboratory: An Interview with Professor Yrjö Engeström from the University of Helsinki[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2022, 44(6): 102-113.

参考文献 12

[1]	Engeström Y. Learning by Expanding:An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research[M]. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit,1987.
[2]	Engeström Y. Activity theory and individual and social transformation[C]//Engeström Y,Miettinen R & Punamäki R L. Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999:377-404.
[3]	Engeström Y & Hannele K. Activity Theory and Workplace Learning[M]. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing, 2007.
[4]	Engeström Y, Kajamaa A & Nummijoki J. Double stimulation in everyday work:Critical encounters between home care workers and their elderly clients[J]. Learning,Culture and Social Interaction, 2015, 4:48-61.
[5]	Engeström Y, Nummijoki J & Sannino A. Embodied germ cell at work:Building an expansive concept of physical mobility in home care[J]. Mind,Culture,and Activity, 2012, 19(3):287-309.
[6]	Leontyev A N. The problem of activity in psychology[J]. Soviet Psychology, 1974, 13(2):4-33.
[7]	Leontyev A N. Problems of the Development of the Mind[M]. Moscow: Progress Publishers,1981.
[8]	Vygotsky L S. Mind and Society:The Development of Higher Mental Processes[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1978.
[9]	孟春国, 郑新民, 陈莉萍. 大学英语教师学术写作与发表活动的案例研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2018(4):44-53.
[10]	吴文, 甘勇. 社会文化视野下二语习得研究25年[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2011, 33(6):75-83.
[11]	颜奕, 杨鲁新. 英语教师专业学习共同体中的主要矛盾分析:活动理论视角[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2017(2):39-49.
[12]	朱效惠, 袁欣. 活动理论视角下的学术英语写作教学研究[J]. 外语界, 2018(1):71-78,87.

文化历史活动理论、拓展性学习与革新实验室——芬兰赫尔辛基大学Yrjö Engeström教授访谈录

On Cultural-historical Activity Theory, Expansive Learning, and the Change Laboratory: An Interview with Professor Yrjö Engeström from the University of Helsinki

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 12

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	武和平, 李乐. 国外二语程式语研究25年：热点及趋势——基于WoS检索期刊的知识图谱分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(5): 67-81.
[2]	曲鑫, 贾莉. 英语听力理解能力动态评价研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(5): 84-100.
[3]	徐亚妮, 杨连瑞, 杨向梅. 国外课堂二语习得研究动态（2010—2019）[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(1): 25-41.
[4]	潘鸣威. 语言测评素养再探——《中国英语能力等级量表》的视角[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(5): 46-56.
[5]	王华, 金艳. 学术英语口语特征描述：以中国英语能力等级量表为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(5): 18-31.
[6]	苗佳,崔峥. 非英语专业大学生英语学习拖延影响因素的实证研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(1): 112-126.
[7]	韩　颖. 学术英语听力多模态混合式学习模式设计[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2017, 39(5): 98-110.
[8]	夏　璐. 基于SIOP模式的商务英语课程设计实证研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2017, 39(3): 105-116.
[9]	程焕福　李媛媛. 基于认知语言学的多义词意义习得实证研究——以over及其合成词和动词短语为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2016, 38(2): 42-58.