基于使用取向的英语动词论元构式二语研究

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.242

北京第二外国语学院学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 4-17.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.242

• 语言学研究（二语习得研究专栏主持人：蔡金亭） • 下一篇

基于使用取向的英语动词论元构式二语研究

蔡金亭¹,陈家宜²

^1. 上海财经大学外国语学院,200433
^2. 广州市南武中学,510220

收稿日期:2018-11-12 出版日期:2019-10-15 发布日期:2020-01-15
作者简介:蔡金亭,上海财经大学外国语学院教授,博士生导师,200433,研究方向：二语习得。电子邮箱：gillcai@163.com
基金资助:
本文是教育部人文社科研究一般项目“母语迁移与语内因素对中国学生使用英语动词论元构式的影响研究”(项目编号：18YJA740001)

Usage-based Approaches to Research on VACs in English as an L2

Jinting Cai¹,Jiayi Chen²

^1. Shanghai University of Finace and Economies, Shanghai 200433, China
^2. Nanwu Middle School, Guangzhou 510220, China

Received:2018-11-12 Online:2019-10-15 Published:2020-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近10多年来,基于使用取向的二语习得研究在国际上发展迅速,特别是在动词论元构式研究上尤其如此,但国内同类研究才刚刚起步。为此,本文在阐述基于使用取向二语习得研究主要理论观点的基础上,重点从内容和方法两方面系统梳理了英语动词论元构式的相关研究。研究内容主要包括学习者的构式知识和母语迁移的影响两个方面。研究方法主要包括语料库、实验方法的分别运用与结合运用,以及计算机模拟等。最后,指出了今后动词论元构式习得研究的五个方面,包括：（1）研究输入因素对英语其他动词论元构式习得的影响;（2）研究更多母语背景下动词论元构式习得中的母语迁移;（3）同时考察输入因素和语言迁移的影响;（4）二语产出与二语加工研究并重;（5）创新研究方法。

关键词: 基于使用取向的范式; 动词论元构式; 二语习得; 频率

Abstract:

Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition (SLA) have gained momentum in the past decade on the international stage. Among the constructions under investigation, English verb-argument constructions (VACs) figures prominently. Unfortunately, this trend has not yet attracted much attention at home. To fill in this gap, this paper first explains the theoretical points of usage-based approaches to SLA, then provides a review of the empirical studies in terms of topics and methods. The topics mainly concern learners’ construction knowledge and the influence of learners’ first language on their use of VACs. With regard to methods, researchers often adopt corpus and experiment in a separate or combined way, while employing computer simulation when necessary. Finally, the authors tentatively make five suggestions for future research: (1) The ways in which various input factors affect more types of VACs should be investigated. (2) More attention should be attached to the effect of first language on the use of second language VACs by learners with diverse first language backgrounds. (3) The interactive effects of input factors and language transfer should be considered. (4) Both production and processing in second language should be emphasized. (5) New methods and techniques should be applied in the research into VACs.

Keywords: usage-based approach; verb-argument constructions (VACs); SLA; frequency

中图分类号:

H319

蔡金亭, 陈家宜. 基于使用取向的英语动词论元构式二语研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(5): 4-17.

Jinting Cai, Jiayi Chen. Usage-based Approaches to Research on VACs in English as an L2[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2019, 41(5): 4-17.

参考文献 28

[1]	Boyd J K & Goldberg A E. Input effects within a constructionist framework[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2009,93(3):418~ 429.
[2]	Ellis N C . Cognitive perspectives on SLA:The associative-cognitive CREED[J]. AILA Review, 2006a,19(1):100~ 121.
[3]	Ellis N C . Language acquisition as rational contingency learning[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2006b,27(1):1~ 24.
[4]	Ellis N C . Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage [C]//Cadierno T & Eskildsen S W. Usage-based Perspectives on Second Language Learning. Berlin:De Gruyter Mouton, 2015: 49~ 73.
[5]	Ellis N C & Ferreira-Junior F. Construction learning as a function of frequency,frequency distribution,and function[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2009a,93(3):370~ 385.
[6]	Ellis N C & Ferreira-Junior F. Constructions and their acquisition:Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy[J]. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2009b,7(1):188~ 221.
[7]	Ellis N C & Larsen-Freeman D. Constructing a second language:Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage[J]. Language Learning, 2009,59(S1):90~ 125.
[8]	Ellis N C & Wulff S. Usage-based approaches to SLA [C]// VanPatten B & William J. Theories in Second Language Acquisition:An Introduction. New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2015: 75~ 93.
[9]	Ellis N C, O’Donnell M B & Römer U. Second language verb-argument constructions are sensitive to form,function,frequency,contingency,and prototypicality[J]. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2014,4(4):405~ 431.
[10]	Ellis N C Römer C & O’Donnell M B. Second language constructions:Usage-based acquisition and transfer[C]//Schwieter J. The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 234~ 254.
[11]	Ellis N C, Römer U, O’Donnell M B & Schleppegrell M J. Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing:Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar[M]. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016.
[12]	Francis G, Hunston S & Manning E. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1:Verbs[M]. London: Harper Collins, 1996.
[13]	Goldberg A E. Constructions:A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
[14]	Goldberg A E. Constructions at Work:The Nature of Generalization in Language[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[15]	Goldberg A E & Casenhiser D. Construction learning and second language acquisition[C]//Robinson P & Ellis N C. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 2008: 197~ 215.
[16]	Gries S T & Wulff S. Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming,sorting,and corpora[J]. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2005,3:182~ 200.
[17]	Robinson P & Ellis N C. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition[M]. London: Routledge, 2008.
[18]	Römer U, O’Donnell M B & Ellis N C. Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions:Effects of language transfer and typology[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2014,98(4):952~ 975.
[19]	Römer U, Roberson A, O’Donnell M B & Ellis N C. Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions[J]. ICAME Journal, 2014,38(1):115~ 135.
[20]	Römer U, Skalicky S C & Ellis N C. Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English learner production:Insights from corpora and verbal fluency tasks[J/OL]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, http://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0055,2018-01-12 .
[21]	Talmy L. Toward A Cognitive Semantics,Vol. 2:Typology and Process in Concept Structuring[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
[22]	Theakston A L, Lieven E V M, Pine J M & Rowland C F. The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure:An alternative account[J]. Journal of Child Language, 2001,28(1):127~ 152.
[23]	Thompson C K, Bonakdarpour B, Fix S C, Blumenfeld H K, Parrish T B, Gitelman D R & Mesulam Mesulam. Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2007,19(11):1753~ 1767.
[24]	Tomasello M. First Verbs:A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[25]	Year J & Gordon P. Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction:The role of verb prototype,input distribution,and frequency[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2009,93(3):399~ 417.
[26]	Zipf G K. The Psycho-biology of Language:An Introduction to Dynamic Philology[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1935.
[27]	徐承萍 . 形符频率、词汇频率和形义映合凸显度在英语构式习得中的效应研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2017,49(3):428~ 439.
[28]	张晓鹏 . 英语动词——论元构式的习得初期,如何“学伴”为更佳[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2015,38(3):65~ 73.

基于使用取向的英语动词论元构式二语研究

Usage-based Approaches to Research on VACs in English as an L2

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘佳, 陈士法, 官群, 赵轶平, 杨连瑞. 中国学习者纸笔手写对英语单词再认影响的实证研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(3): 103-119.
[2]	胡丽娜, 常辉. “可加工性理论”及其在汉语二语习得中的应用[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(3): 151-163.
[3]	徐亚妮, 杨连瑞, 杨向梅. 国外课堂二语习得研究动态（2010—2019）[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(1): 25-41.
[4]	郝霞. 英语程式语可学性的语言模因论解读[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(2): 76-86.
[5]	李昆. 二语动机自我系统对动机调控策略及动机行为的影响研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(2): 87-100.
[6]	周正钟. 附带习得中二语学习者对语块与单词外围注意的对比研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(5): 38-52.
[7]	刘鹏. 三语习得视角下的读后续写协同效应研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(5): 53-67.
[8]	李绍鹏,杨连瑞. 二语习得“以写促学”的理据及其路径[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(3): 61-73.
[9]	王淼. 二语写作句法复杂性研究的新发展[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(2): 81-99.