中国学习者纸笔手写对英语单词再认影响的实证研究

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.456

北京第二外国语学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 103-119.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.456

中国学习者纸笔手写对英语单词再认影响的实证研究

刘佳¹(), 陈士法²(), 官群³(), 赵轶平²(), 杨连瑞²()

1.河北师范大学外国语学院，050024
2.中国海洋大学外国语学院，266100
3.北京语言大学外国语学部，100083

收稿日期:2019-11-06 出版日期:2023-06-30 发布日期:2023-07-05
作者简介:刘佳，博士，河北师范大学外国语学院，050024，研究方向：心理语言学。电子邮箱：jiayou0826@163.com
陈士法，博士，中国海洋大学外国语学院教授，博士生导师，266100，研究方向：心理语言学、二语习得。电子邮箱：chenshifa99@ouc.edu.cn
官群，博士，北京语言大学外国语学部教授，博士生导师，100083，研究方向：心理语言学、神经语言学。电子邮箱：qunguan81@163.com
赵轶平，中国海洋大学外国语学院，266100，研究方向：心理语言学。电子邮箱：845467295@qq.com
杨连瑞，博士，中国海洋大学外国语学院教授，博士生导师，266100，研究方向：二语习得。电子邮箱：larryyang@126.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目“英汉心理词汇表征及计算模型研究”(21BYY114);国家自然科学基金项目“基于语言分布式模型的具身语义数据库—语料库—词汇学习关联机制AI系统”(62077011);国家自然科学基金项目“儿童手写运动促进中英文感知的认知神经机制”(31500915);国家社会科学基金项目“中学生英语学习困难的脑机制研究”(BBA180075);河北师范大学人文社会科学研究基金项目“情绪直意词和情绪隐含词加工的认知神经机制研究”(S22B015)

An Empirical Study of the Influence of “Pen-and-Paper Handwriting” on the Recognition of English Words by Chinese Learners of English

Liu Jia¹(), Chen Shifa²(), Guan Qun³(), Zhao Yiping²(), Yang Lianrui²()

1. Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
2. Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
3. Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2019-11-06 Online:2023-06-30 Published:2023-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究把中国英语学习者分为纸笔手写组和注视组，通过词汇判断任务，考察纸笔手写对中国英语学习者英语单词再认的影响。研究发现：①组别主效应显著：较之注视组，手写组的反应速度显著提升，但正确率有所下降；②频率主效应显著：频率影响了两组英语单词的再认，高频词汇具有更短的反应时和更高的正确率，频率与组别交互效应不显著；③词性与组别交互效应显著：简单效应分析表明，相对于注视，词性更显著地影响了纸笔手写英语单词再认。本研究结果支持基于使用的语言习得观和英语二语名动分离现象，对计算机时代的英语教学具有一定启示作用。研究结论表明，在英语二语词汇教学中应加强对学生纸笔手写能力的培养。

关键词: 纸笔手写; 频率; 词性; 手写再认; 注视再认; 具身认知; 名动分离

Abstract:

The present research investigated the influence of “pen-and-paper handwriting” on the recognition of English words by Chinese learners of English by employing lexical decision tasks with participants who were divided into a pen-and-paper handwriting group and a reading-only group. The results of the statistical analyses indicated that there was a significant main effect of group: pen-and-paper handwriting could facilitate the recognition of English words by significantly decreasing the reaction time with a less robust decline in accuracy. In addition, there was a considerable main effect of frequency: frequency not only influenced the recognition of handwritten English words using pen and paper, but also the reading-only group’s recognition of English words. High-frequency words were associated with shorter reaction times and greater accuracy. No significant interaction effect between group and frequency was found. Furthermore, there was a significant interaction effect between parts of speech and the group. Parts of speech had a greater influence on the recognition of handwritten English words than they did on the reading-only group. Hence, the present research concluded that handwriting facilitated the recognition of English words by Chinese learners of English. Frequency and parts of speech influenced English word recognition, and parts of speech influenced the recognition of handwritten English words by Chinese learners of English more effectively than did reading-only recognition, which supports the theory of usage-based approaches to language acquisition and the disassociation between nouns and verbs.

Keywords: pen-and-paper handwriting; frequency; parts of speech; handwriting recognition; reading-only recognition; embodied cognition; disassociation between nouns and verbs

中图分类号:

刘佳, 陈士法, 官群, 赵轶平, 杨连瑞. 中国学习者纸笔手写对英语单词再认影响的实证研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(3): 103-119.

Liu Jia, Chen Shifa, Guan Qun, Zhao Yiping, Yang Lianrui. An Empirical Study of the Influence of “Pen-and-Paper Handwriting” on the Recognition of English Words by Chinese Learners of English[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2023, 45(3): 103-119.

图/表 2

参考文献 43

[1]	BORGHI A M & CIMATTI F. Embodied cognition and beyond:Acting and sensing the body[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2010(3):763-773.
[2]	CAO Fan, RICKLES B, VU M, et al. Early stage visual-orthographic processes predict long-term retention of word form and meaning:A visual encoding training study[J]. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2013(4):440-461. PMID
[3]	CHAN A H D, LUKE K K, LI Ping, et al. Neural correlates of nouns and verbs in early bilinguals[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008(1):30-40.
[4]	CHANG Liyun, STAFURA J Z, RICKLES B, et al. Incremental learning of Chinese orthography:ERP indicators of animated and static stroke displays on character form and meaning acquisition[J]. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2015, 33:78-95. DOI URL
[5]	DIEPENDAELE K, LEMHÖFER K & BRYSBAERT M. The word frequency effect in first-and second-language word recognition:A lexical entrenchment account[J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2013(5):843-863.
[6]	DUYCK W, VANDERELST D, DESMET T, et al. The frequency effect in second-language visual word recognition[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2008(4):850-855.
[7]	GIOVANNI F B D. Order of strokes writing as a cue for retrieval in reading Chinese characters[J]. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1994(4):337-355.
[8]	GUAN C Q, LIU Ying, CHAN D H L, et al. Writing strengthens orthography and alphabetic-coding strengthens phonology in learning to read Chinese[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011(3):509-522.
[9]	GUAN C Q, PERFETTI C A & MENG Wanjin. Writing quality predicts Chinese learning[J]. Reading and Writing, 2015(6):763-795.
[10]	JAMES K H. Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain[J]. Developmental Science, 2010(2):279-288. DOI PMID
[11]	JAMES K H & GAUTHIER I. Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory-motor brain network[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2006(14):2937-2949. PMID
[12]	JAMES K H & GAUTHIER I. When writing impairs reading:Letter perception’s susceptibility to motor interference[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 2009(3):416-431.
[13]	LI J X & JAMES K H. Handwriting generates variable visual output to facilitate symbol learning[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 2016(3):298-313.
[14]	LONGCAMP M, ANTON J L, ROTH M, et al. Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing[J]. NeuroImage, 2003(4):1492-1500. PMID
[15]	LONGCAMP M, BOUCARD C, GILHODES J C, et al. Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge:A comparison between handwriting and typing[J]. Human Movement Science, 2006(4/5):646-656.
[16]	LONGCAMP M, BOUCARD C, GILHODES J C, et al. Learning through hand-or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes:Behavioral and functional imaging evidence[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2008(5):802-815.
[17]	LONGCAMP M, ZERBATO-POUDOU M T & VELAY J L. The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children:A comparison between handwriting and typing[J]. Acta Psychologica, 2005(1):67-79.
[18]	MACINTYRE P D, NOELS K A & CLÉMENT R. Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency:The role of language anxiety[J]. Language Learning, 1997(2):265-287.
[19]	MOLFESE V J, BESWICK J L, JACOBI-VESSELS J L, et al. Evidence of alphabetic knowledge in writing:Connections to letter and word identification skills in preschool and kindergarten[J]. Reading and Writing, 2011(2):133-150.
[20]	MONAGHAN P, CHANG Yaning, WELBOURNE S, et al. Exploring the relations between word frequency,language exposure,and bilingualism in a computational model of reading[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2017, 93:1-21. DOI URL
[21]	MOSELEY R L & PULVERMÜLLER F. Nouns,verbs,objects,actions,and abstractions:Local fMRI activity indexes semantics,not lexical categories[J]. Brain and Language, 2014, 132:28-42. DOI URL
[22]	NAKA M. Repeated writing facilitates children’s memory for pseudocharacters and foreign letters[J]. Memory & Cognition, 1998(4):804-809.
[23]	PULVERMÜLLER F, LUTZENBERGER F & PREISSL H. Nouns and verbs in the intact brain:Evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency cortical responses[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 1999(5):497-506.
[24]	PULVERMÜLLER F, MOHR B & SCHLEICHERT H. Semantic or lexico-syntactic factors:What determines word-class specific activity in the human brain[J]. Neuroscience Letters, 1999(2):81-84.
[25]	RAYNER K, WHITE S J, JOHNSON R L, et al. Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres:There is a cost[J]. Psychological Science, 2006(3):192-193.
[26]	TAN Lihai, XU Min, CHANG Chunqi, et al. China’s language input system in the digital age affects children’s reading development[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013(3):1119-1123.
[27]	WHITE S J, JOHNSON R L, LIVERSEDGE S P, et al. Eye movements when reading transposed text:The importance of word-beginning letters[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 2008(5):1261-1276.
[28]	XU Yi, CHANG Liyun, ZHANG Juan, et al. Reading,writing,and animation in character learning in Chinese as a foreign language[J]. Foreign Language Annals, 2013(3):423-444.
[29]	陈京军, 许磊, 程晓荣, 等. 儿童汉字练习:纸笔手写与键盘拼音输入的效果比较[J]. 心理学报, 2016(10):1258-1269.
[30]	陈菊咏. 数字时代的手写危机和教育对策[J]. 教育发展研究, 2014(22):44-49.
[31]	陈士法, 杜玲, 刘佳, 等. 中国英语学习者英语二语名动分离的ERP证据[J]. 外语电化教学, 2016(2):10-15,20.
[32]	陈士法, 彭建武, 侯林平, 等. 英汉心理词典中英语单词储存的词性效应研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(2):95-100.
[33]	顾介鑫, 张强. 名动两重分离现象的神经电生理学研究述评[J]. 外语研究, 2005(5):17-21.
[34]	官群. 行动为基础的语言观及其对语言学习机制的诠释:一个有关语言习得、理解以及生成的理论[J]. 山东外语教学, 2014(2):39-46.
[35]	官群. 具身语言学——人工智能时代的语言科学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
[36]	官群, 赵建蓉. 手写运动对中英文字感知神经作用的实证研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2019(3):11-20.
[37]	曲方炳, 殷融, 钟元, 等. 语言理解中的动作知觉:基于具身认知的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012(6):834-842.
[38]	舒华, 张亚旭. 心理学研究方法:实验设计和数据分析[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2008.
[39]	王初明. 基于使用的语言习得观[J]. 中国外语, 2011(5):1.
[40]	许先文. 语言具身认知研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2014.
[41]	杨连瑞. 首次感知与外语教学[J]. 山东外语教学, 1986(4):76,80.
[42]	叶浩生. 身体与学习:具身认知及其对传统教育观的挑战[J]. 教育研究, 2015(4):104-114.
[43]	张建琴. 中国英语学习者公式化语言加工心理机制研究[J]. 外语界, 2013(5):76-85.

因变量	词汇类型	纸笔手写组			注视组
因变量	词汇类型	均值	标准差	95%置信区间	均值	标准差	95%置信区间
反应时（ms）	高频名词	1056.88	287.00	965.49—1148.27	1152.68	286.22	1062.44—1242.92
	高频动词	1039.88	260.28	952.44—1127.31	1124.12	287.15	1037.79—1210.46
	低频名词	1263.49	332.88	1160.94—1366.05	1308.25	310.29	1206.98—1409.52
	低频动词	1301.79	360.92	1186.43—1417.14	1418.02	362.63	1304.11—1531.93
正确率（%）	高频名词	94.38	5.91	92.70—96.07	95.95	4.52	94.29—97.62
	高频动词	95.97	7.13	94.07—97.87	97.38	4.57	95.50—99.26
	低频名词	78.27	10.35	74.63—81.90	77.14	12.35	73.55—80.73
	低频动词	70.82	17.76	65.46—76.18	78.10	15.84	72.80—83.39

因变量	词汇类型	纸笔手写组			注视组
因变量	词汇类型	均值	标准差	95%置信区间	均值	标准差	95%置信区间
反应时（ms）	高频名词	1056.88	287.00	965.49—1148.27	1152.68	286.22	1062.44—1242.92
	高频动词	1039.88	260.28	952.44—1127.31	1124.12	287.15	1037.79—1210.46
	低频名词	1263.49	332.88	1160.94—1366.05	1308.25	310.29	1206.98—1409.52
	低频动词	1301.79	360.92	1186.43—1417.14	1418.02	362.63	1304.11—1531.93
正确率（%）	高频名词	94.38	5.91	92.70—96.07	95.95	4.52	94.29—97.62
	高频动词	95.97	7.13	94.07—97.87	97.38	4.57	95.50—99.26
	低频名词	78.27	10.35	74.63—81.90	77.14	12.35	73.55—80.73
	低频动词	70.82	17.76	65.46—76.18	78.10	15.84	72.80—83.39

中国学习者纸笔手写对英语单词再认影响的实证研究

An Empirical Study of the Influence of “Pen-and-Paper Handwriting” on the Recognition of English Words by Chinese Learners of English

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 43

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	葛娜娜. 跨语言名词性领属结构的编码方式[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(6): 44-67.
[2]	蔡金亭, 陈家宜. 基于使用取向的英语动词论元构式二语研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(5): 4-17.