国外言据性研究的进展与动态

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.415

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

言据性是指说话人在语言使用过程中标记言语信息来源的现象。近年来，相关研究取得丰硕成果。本文主要基于Elsevier、ProQuest和EBSCO等文献数据库，梳理近十余年国外言据性研究的脉络。研究发现：①研究视角上，除了语法语义维度，认知心理、语用和语篇分析等维度被广泛采用，其中语用视角权重明显增加，学界还提出了人际言据的概念；②路径和方法上，言据标记不仅是考察的对象，也是话语分析的抓手，同时，跨语言的语料库研究或实验分析开始较多地出现。

关键词: 言据性; 言据标记语; 国外研究; 动态综述

Abstract:

As widely accepted in the existing literature, evidentiality is a domain that encodes the source of information for a given statement. Studies of the topic have been fruitful in recent years. Based on a survey of the publications in Elsevier, ProQuest, and EBSCO, the study found that 1) theoretically, apart from the dimensions of formal grammar and semantics, cognitive psychology, pragmatics, and discourse analysis were frequently adopted, among which the pragmatic perspective has increased in popularity. Scholars have even proposed the concept of interpersonal evidentiality; and 2) methodologically, evidentiality is not only a target for investigation, but is also a tool for conducting discourse analysis. Moreover, cross-language corpus studies and experimental designs are attracting increasing attention.

Keywords: evidentiality; evidential marker; foreign studies; review

中图分类号:

H030

郭亚东. 国外言据性研究的进展与动态[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(5): 119-129.

Guo Yadong. Foreign Studies of Evidentiality Revisited[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2022, 44(5): 119-129.

图/表 1

参考文献 49

[1]	Adelaar W & Lau M L. Introduction to the special issue[J]. Lingua, 2017,186-187:1-4.
[2]	Aijmer K. Seem and evidentiality[J]. Functions of Language, 2009, 16(1):63-88. DOI URL
[3]	Aikhenvald A Y. Evidentiality[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
[4]	Berkenfield C. Pragmatic motivations for the development of evidential and modal meaning in the construction “be supposed to X”[J]. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2006, 7(1):39-71. DOI URL
[5]	Berlin L N & Prieto-Mendoza A. Evidential embellishment in political debates during US campaigns[J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2014, 11(3):389-409.
[6]	Boas F. Handbook of American Indian Languages[M]. Washington,D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1911.
[7]	Boas F. Kwakiutl grammar with a glossary of the suffixes[J]. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 1947, 37:201-377.
[8]	Chafe W L & Nichols J. Evidentiality:The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology[M]. Norwood:Ablex, 1986.
[9]	Chung K S. Korean evidentials and assertion[J]. Lingua, 2010, 120(4):932-952. DOI URL
[10]	Déchaine R M, Cook C, Muehlbauer J, et al. (De-)constructing evidentiality[J]. Lingua, 2017,186-187:21-54.
[11]	DeLancey S. Mirativity:The grammatical marking of unexpected information[J]. Linguistic Typology, 1997, 1:33-52.
[12]	Dendale P & Tasmowski L. Introduction:Evidentiality and related notions[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2001, 33(3):339-348. DOI URL
[13]	Diewald G & Smirnova E. Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2010.
[14]	Ekström A. Epistemic positioning and frameworks for participation:Learning to assess objects of craft in teacher education[J]. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2013, 2(4):277-292. DOI URL
[15]	Estellés-Arguedas M. Expressing evidentiality through prosody? Prosodic voicing in reported speech in Spanish colloquial conversations[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2015, 85:138-154. DOI URL
[16]	Etxepare R. From hearsay evidentiality to same saying relations[J]. Lingua, 2010, 120(3):604-627. DOI URL
[17]	Fetzer A. Foregrounding evidentiality in(English) academic discourse:Patterned co-occurrences of the sensory perception verbs seem and appear[J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2014, 11(3):333-355.
[18]	Fetzer A & Oishi E. Evidentiality in discourse[J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2014, 11(3):321-332.
[19]	González M, Roseano P, Borràs-Comes J, et al. Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse:Effects of register and debatability[J]. Lingua, 2017,186-187:68-87.
[20]	Hintz D J & Hintz D M. The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua[J]. Lingua, 2017,186-187:88-109.
[21]	Hsieh C L. Evidentiality in Chinese newspaper reports:Subjectivity/objectivity as a factor[J]. Discourse Studies, 2008, 10(2):205-229. DOI URL
[22]	Kwon K. A bias-driven modal development of evidentiality:The Korean inferential evidential-po[J]. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2018, 27(4):311-346. DOI URL
[23]	Lauwers P & Duée C. From aspect to evidentiality:The subjectification path of the French semi-copula se faire and its Spanish cognate hacerse[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, 43(4):1042-1060. DOI URL
[24]	Lee C. Psych-predicates:1st person and evidentiality[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 97:414-421.
[25]	Marco M A. Evidentiality in non-evidential languages:Are there evidentials in Spanish?[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2015, 85 :135-137. DOI URL
[26]	McCready E & Ogata N. Evidentiality,modality and probability[J]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2007, 30(2):147-206. DOI URL
[27]	Oishi E. Evidentials in entextualization[J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2014, 11(3):437-462.
[28]	Ozturk O & Papafragou A. The acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring[J]. Language Learning & Development, 2016, 12(2):199-230.
[29]	Papafragou A. Epistemic modality and truth conditions[J]. Lingua, 2006, 116(10):1688-1720. DOI URL
[30]	Papafragou A, Li P, Choi Y, et al. Evidentiality in language and cognition[J]. Cognition, 2007, 103(2):253-299. DOI PMID
[31]	Reber E. Constructing evidence at Prime Minister’s Question Time:An analysis of the grammar,semantics and pragmatics of the verb see[J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2014, 11(3):357-387.
[32]	Roque L S, Floyd S & Norcliffe E. Evidentiality and interrogativity[J]. Lingua, 2017,186-187:120-143.
[33]	Rosique S R. Distance, evidentiality and counter-argumentation:Concessive future in Spanish[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2015, 85:181-199. DOI URL
[34]	Sbisà M. Evidentiality and illocution[J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2014, 11(3):463-483.
[35]	Squartini M. Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian[J]. Linguistics, 2008, 46(5):917-947.
[36]	Squartini M. Evidentiality in interaction:The concessive use of the Italian Future between grammar and discourse[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2012, 44(15):2116-2128. DOI URL
[37]	Tantucci V. Interpersonal evidentiality:The Mandarin V-过 guo construction and other evidential systems beyond the ‘source of information’[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, 57:210-230. DOI URL
[38]	Tosun S, Vaid J & Geraci L. Does obligatory linguistic marking of source of evidence affect source memory? A Turkish/English investigation[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2013, 69(2):121-134. DOI URL
[39]	Whitt R J. Auditory evidentiality in English and German:The case of perception verbs[J]. Lingua, 2009, 119(7):1083-1095. DOI URL
[40]	Willett T. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality[J]. Studies in Language, 1988, 12(1):51-97. DOI URL
[41]	房红梅. 言据性研究述评[J]. 现代外语, 2006, 29(2):191-196.
[42]	郭亚东. 网络新闻的言据性——以“马航370失联事件”相关报道为例[J]. 江苏外语教学研究, 2015(2):48-51.
[43]	胡壮麟. 语言的可证性[J]. 外语教学与研究, 1994a(1):9-15,80.
[44]	胡壮麟. 可证性、新闻报道和论辩语体[J]. 外语研究, 1994b(2):22-28.
[45]	胡壮麟. 汉语的可证性和语篇分析[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1995(2):13-23.
[46]	牛保义. 国外实据性理论研究[J]. 当代语言学, 2005, 7(1):53-61.
[47]	冉永平, 杨娜. 危机语境下媒体信息的言据性及其语用分析[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2016(6):12-21.
[48]	杨林秀. 英文学术论文中的作者身份构建:言据性视角[J]. 外语教学, 2015, 36(2): 21-25.
[49]	杨佑文, 印睿. 英汉语篇指示语的范畴类型及其例示性对比研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2015(6):1-12.