Please wait a minute...
  •  
北京第二外国语学院学报
北京第二外国语学院学报  2020, Vol. 42 Issue (4): 92-107    DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.295
外语教学研究     
生态给养视阈下英语知识内化机制构建——基于课堂展示活动
秦丽莉1(), 何艳华2(), 欧阳西贝1()
1.大连外国语大学英语学院,大连 116044
2.上海外国语大学英语学院,上海 200083
Internalization Mechanism of English Knowledge from the Perspective of Ecological Affordances—Through Class Presentation Activities
Lili Qin1(), Yanhua He2(), Xibei Ouyang1()
1. Dalian University of Foreign Languages, Dalian 116044, China
2. Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 200083, China
 全文: PDF(1585 KB)   HTML
摘要：

英语学习环境中的生态给养不仅包含人际给养,同样也应包含脑内给养。本研究以解读生态理论和内化理论的内涵为切入点,找出两者的兼容性,并尝试构建生态给养视阈下英语知识内化机制概念框架。本研究依托课堂展示活动,运用叙事法和访谈法对两名研究生的英语知识内化机制展开调查。首先,研究者描述了展示者课堂展示活动前、活动中和活动后的人际给养和脑内给养状况,发现以上两种给养均可以有效推进英语知识的内化。其次,研究者阐释了内化发展的全过程。同时,研究者还发现英语知识的内化机制具有重复性和调节性,并在此基础上最终构建了英语知识内化机制概念框架。本研究旨在调查展示者在进行课堂展示活动时的知识内化过程,为未来给养及内化理论研究提供新思路。
关键词： 生态给养;  知识内化;  课堂展示活动    
Abstract:

Starting with interpretation of the ecological affordances and internalization theories, this study locates compatibility between the two and constructs the conceptual internalization mechanism of English knowledge. The researchers propose that there should not only be inter-psychological affordances in the English learning environment but also intra-psychological affordances. Based on the proposed conceptual mechanism, the study then investigates two postgraduate students via narratives and interviews during class presentation activities. From the data, the researchers describe the inter-psychological and intra-psychological ecological affordances before, during, and after the presentation, and they discover that the two affordances make an active impact on the development of internalization. Meanwhile, the researchers conclude that internalization mechanism is repeatable and adjustable; they then construct the mechanism based on these two features with the aim to investigate the knowledge internalization process of presenters during presentation activities, offering some insight for English teaching.
Key words: ecological affordances    knowledge internalization    class presentation activities
收稿日期: 2019-10-10 出版日期: 2020-08-30
PACS:  H319  
基金资助: 本2016年度国家社会科学基金项目“信息技术背景下中国外语学习环境‘生态给养’转化有效性研究”(16BYY093);辽宁省教育厅重点攻关项目“‘社会文化理论’指导的外语学习者在大规模线上学习情境中的能动性研究”(2020JYT02);辽宁省经济发展一般项目“服务国家战略,探索新‘国标’指导下的多语言教育研究”(2020lslktyb-025)
作者简介: 秦丽莉,博士,大连外国语大学教授,博士生导师,116044,研究方向：二语习得、跨文化交际学等。电子邮箱：smilingtou@163.com
何艳华,上海外国语大学英语学院,研究方向：外语教育与教师专业发展。电子邮箱：heyanhua612@163.com
欧阳西贝,大连外国语大学英语学院,研究方向：二语习得。电子邮箱：478967434@qq.com
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　
秦丽莉
何艳华
欧阳西贝

引用本文:

秦丽莉, 何艳华, 欧阳西贝. 生态给养视阈下英语知识内化机制构建——基于课堂展示活动[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(4): 92-107.

Lili Qin, Yanhua He, Xibei Ouyang. Internalization Mechanism of English Knowledge from the Perspective of Ecological Affordances—Through Class Presentation Activities. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2020, 42(4): 92-107.

链接本文:

https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/10.12002/j.bisu.295    或    https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V42/I4/92

图1  生态给养视阈下英语知识内化机制概念框架 改编自Lawrence & Valsiner,1993;秦丽莉等,2018）
展示者 性别 年龄 父母职业 第二外语 本科毕业院校 兴趣爱好
甲 女 24 职员 日语 二类本科（师范类） 音乐
乙 女 24 职员 法语 二类本科（师范类） 旅游
表1  展示者信息
图2  生态给养视阈下英语知识内化机制修正框架
[1] Ahearn L M. Language and agency[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2001,30:109~137.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
[2] Ahn T Y. Learner agency and the use of affordances in language-exchange interactions[J]. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2016,16(2):164~181.
doi: 10.1080/14708477.2015.1125911
[3] Arievitch I M. Beyond the Brain:An Agentive Activity Perspective on Mind,Development,and Learning[M]. Rotterdam:Sense Publishers, 2017.
[4] Aronin L. Conceptualizations of multilingualism:An affordances perspective[J]. Critical Multilingualism Studies, 2017,5(1):174~207.
[5] Aronin L & Singleton D. Affordances theory in multilingualism studies[J]. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2012,2(3):311~331.
doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.3
[6] de Guerrero M C M. Going covert:Inner and private speech in language learning[J]. Language Teaching, 2018,51(1):1~35.
doi: 10.1017/S0261444817000295
[7] de Guerrero M C M & Commander M. Shadow-reading:Affordances for imitation in the language classroom[J]. Language Teaching Research, 2013,17(4):433~453.
doi: 10.1177/1362168813494125
[8] Duff P D. Language socialization into academic discourse communities[J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2010,30:169~192.
doi: 10.1017/S0267190510000048
[9] Fahim M & Haghani M. Sociocultural perspectives on foreign language learning[J]. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2012,3(4):693~699.
[10] Feryok A. Sociocultural theory and task-based language teaching:The role of praxis[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 2017,51(3):716~727.
doi: 10.1002/tesq.2017.51.issue-3
[11] Gibson E J & Pick A D. An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[12] Gibson J J. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems[M]. Boston:Houghton Mifflin, 1966.
[13] Gibson J J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M]. Boston:Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
[14] Harvey J. A Sociocultural-Theory-Based Study of the Impact of Mediation during Post-Observation Conferences on Language Teacher Learning[D]. Tampa:University of South Florida, 2011.
[15] Jiang A L & Zhang L J. Chinese students’ perceptions of English learning affordances and their agency in an English-medium instruction classroom context[J]. Language and Education, 2019,33(4):322~339.
doi: 10.1080/09500782.2019.1578789
[16] Kirschner P, Strijbos J W, Kreijns K et al. Designing electronic collaborative learning environments[J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2004,52(3):47~66.
doi: 10.1007/BF02504675
[17] Lantolf J P & Poehner M E. Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education:Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide[M]. New York:Routledge, 2014.
[18] Lantolf J P, Poehner M E & Swain M. The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development[M]. New York:Routledge, 2018.
[19] Lantolf J P & Thorne S L. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[20] Lantolf J P & Yáñez M D C. Talking yourself into Spanish:Intrapersonal communication and second language learning[J]. Hispañia, 2003,86(1):97~109.
[21] Larsen-Freeman D. Looking ahead:Future directions in,and future research into,second language acquisition[J]. Foreign Language Annals, 2018,51(1):55~72.
doi: 10.1111/flan.12314
[22] Lawrence J A & Valsiner J. Conceptual roots of internalization:From transmission to transformation[J]. Human Development, 1993,36(3):150~167.
doi: 10.1159/000277333
[23] Lawrence J A & Valsiner J. Making personal sense:An account of basic internalization and externalization processes[J]. Theory & Psychology, 2003,13(6):723~752.
[24] McGrenere J & Ho W. Affordances:Clarifying and evolving a concept[C]//Proceedings of Graphics Interface. Montreal:Basic Books, 2000: 179~186.
[25] McNeil L. Ecological affordance and anxiety in an oral asynchronous computer-mediated environment[J]. Language Learning & Technology, 2014,18(1):142~159.
[26] Menezes V. Affordances for language learning beyond the classroom[M]//Benson P & Reinders H. Beyond the Language Classroom. London:Palgrave Macmillan, 2011: 59~71.
[27] Murray G & Fujishima N. Social language learning spaces:Affordances in a community of learners[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2013,36(1):141~157.
[28] Ohta S. Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom:Learning Japanese[M]. Mahwah:Erlbaum, 2001.
[29] Pathan H, Memon R, Memon S et al. A critical review of Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory in second language acquisition[J]. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2018,8(4):232~236.
doi: 10.5539/ijel.v8n4p232
[30] Qi F. Making Meaning of Chinese International Graduate Students’ Experiences in the Journey of Learning English in the United States[D]. New Mexico:The University of New Mexico, 2017.
[31] Thoms J J. An ecological view of whole-class discussions in a second language literature classroom:Teacher reformulations as affordances for learning[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2014,98(3):724~741.
doi: 10.1111/modl.12119
[32] Tomasello M. Constructing a Language:A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.
[33] Tomlinson B. The inner voice:A critical factor in L2 learning[J]. The Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning and Teaching, 2001(6):23~33.
[34] van Compernolle R A. Interaction and Second Language Development:A Vygotskian Perspective[M]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015.
[35] van Lier L. From input to affordance:Social interactive learning from an ecological perspective[M] //Lantolf J P. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000: 245~259.
[36] van Lier L. The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning:A Sociocultural Perspective[M]. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
[37] Vygotsky L S. Mind in Society:The Development of Higher Psychological Processes[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1978.
[38] 陈佳辉. 基于社会文化理论的纠正性反馈对高中生英语写作能力的影响[D]. 济南:山东师范大学, 2018.
[39] 段玲琍. 社会文化理论与语用习得研究[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2017.
[40] 黄景, 龙娜娜, 滕锋. 给养与外语教育[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2018(1):39~52.
[41] 黄景, 陆佑宁, 滕锋. 英语教学自主性:一项香港中学新入职英语教师的个案研究(英文)[J]. 中国应用语言学, 2019,42(1):3~20.
[42] Lantolf J, 秦丽莉. 社会文化理论——哲学根源、学科属性、研究范式与方法[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2018(1):1~18.
[43] 李彤彤, 武法提. 给养视域下网络学习环境的生态结构新解[J]. 电化教育研究, 2016,(11):51~59.
[44] 李霞. 基于互联网的大学英语生态课程研究[J]. 中国外语, 2017,14(5):81~86.
[45] 马俊波. 社会文化理论及二语习得研究的社会文化视角[J]. 天津外国语学院学报, 2008,15(3):9~15.
[46] 马牧青. 高校外语教师信息资源给养转化行为研究[D]. 上海:上海外国语大学, 2018.
[47] 马悦. 混合式教学模式下大学英语课堂的生态建构[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018,31(9):88~92.
[48] 秦丽莉. 社会文化视域下英语学习者能动性与身份之间的关系[J]. 外语教学, 2015,36(1):60~64.
[49] 秦丽莉. 二语习得社会文化理论概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019.
[50] 秦丽莉, 戴炜栋. 二语习得社会文化理论框架下的“生态化”任务型语言教学研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2013a(2):41~46.
[51] 秦丽莉, 戴炜栋. 活动理论框架下的大学英语学习动机自我系统模型构建[J]. 外语界, 2013b(6):23~31.
[52] 秦丽莉, 戴炜栋. 生态视阈下大学英语学习环境给养状况调查[J]. 现代外语, 2015,38(2):227~237.
[53] 秦丽莉, 何艳华, 欧阳西贝. 社会文化理论框架下的内化理论研究综述[J]. 语言教育, 2018(2):30~34.
[54] 文秋芳. 二语习得重点问题研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2010.
[55] 文秋芳, 俞洪亮, 周维杰. 应用语言学研究方法与论文写作(中文版)[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2004.
[56] 吴文, 甘勇. 社会文化视野下二语习得研究25年[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2011,33(6):75~83.
[57] 徐锦芬, 聂睿. 《社会文化理论及其在二语教育中的必要性》述评[J]. 现代外语, 2015,38(4):575~578.
[58] 杨贝. 学生课堂展示在研究生英语教学中的作用[J]. 国外外语教学, 2006(3):47~49.
[59] 余可华. 可供性理论对二语习得的启示[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2018(3):34~42.
[1] 王华, 金艳. 学术英语口语特征描述：以中国英语能力等级量表为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(5): 18-31.
[2] 李清华, 孔烁. 语言能力等级量表效度研究评述[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(5): 32-45.
[3] 潘鸣威. 语言测评素养再探——《中国英语能力等级量表》的视角[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(5): 46-56.
[4] 孔文, 李迪. 《全球职场英语能力量表》的研制及其启示[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(5): 57-70.
[5] 刘宏, 王军哲, 罗林, 王俊菊, 李迎迎, 武光军. 外国语言文学学科高质量发展的路径*[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(4): 3-12.
[6] 申甜. 中国商务英语研究的热点综评——基于2001—2018年CSSCI期刊和中文核心期刊数据库文献的共词可视化研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(3): 85-98.
[7] 蔡基刚. 应急语言服务与应急语言教学探索[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(3): 13-21.
[8] 郭英剑. 对英语专业的不当批评,可以休矣[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(3): 3-12.
[9] 陈坚林. 试论人工智能技术在外语教学上的体现与应用[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(2): 14-25.
[10] 常新萍. 语法填空任务中的策略参与有声思维实证研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(1): 96-110.
[11] 陈佳. 面向非英语专业研究生的学术英语学习需求分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(6): 106-119.
[12] 蔡金亭, 陈家宜. 基于使用取向的英语动词论元构式二语研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(5): 4-17.
[13] 范莉. 如何实现“课堂科研化、科研课堂化”——关于高校外语教师开展行动研究的调查报告[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(4): 104-115.
[14] 蔡基刚. 新时代背景下 《大学英语教学指南》的修订及理论依据[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(3): 3-16.
[15] 孙毅. 英语专业与专业英语十大关系：困境与突围[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(3): 17-30.