概念转喻研究的理论前沿与发展动向

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.483

北京第二外国语学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 147-160.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.483

• 学术前沿与动态 • 上一篇

概念转喻研究的理论前沿与发展动向

魏在江()

广东外语外贸大学英文学院，国家重点文科基地外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心，510420

收稿日期:2020-08-03 出版日期:2023-10-30 发布日期:2023-11-07
作者简介:魏在江，广东外语外贸大学英文学院教授，国家重点文科基地外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心兼职研究员，博士生导师，510420，研究方向：认知语言学、对比语言学等。电子邮箱：weizaijiang@163.com
基金资助:
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目“百年来欧美外来词语的全息语料库建设与汉语化机制研究”的阶段性研究成果(21JDA050);国家哲学社会科学基金项目“全过程人民民主话语建构与国际传播研究”(22BYY070)

Latest Development in Research on Conceptual Metonymy

Wei Zaijiang()

Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China

Received:2020-08-03 Online:2023-10-30 Published:2023-11-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文从认知语言学的角度，简述概念转喻研究的最新进展，分析其发展脉络，展望未来的发展路径与方向。文章首先回顾了研究范式的转变：从修辞到认知；其次讨论了近年来概念转喻研究新的进展，如转喻触发语、转喻的认知功能研究；最后展望了概念转喻研究未来发展的方向，建议加强英汉转喻对比与相关实践领域——如翻译理论与实践、语言教学——的研究。

关键词: 概念转喻; 修辞; 认知; 语法转喻; 隐喻

Abstract:

This paper, based on the discussions of examples in English and Chinese metonymy, outlines the latest development of the research on conceptual metonymy and prospects its future research path and directions. First, this paper discusses the transfer of research paradigm from rhetoric to cognitive linguistics. Second, it discusses the latest development of metonymy studies, such as the studies on metonymic triggers and the functions of metonymy. Third, it puts forward some suggestions such as doing the contrastive studies between English and Chinese metonymy, and applying the research results to translation and language teaching & learning for the future studies.

Keywords: conceptual metonymy; rhetoric; cognition; grammatical metonymy; metaphors

中图分类号:

H0-0

魏在江. 概念转喻研究的理论前沿与发展动向[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(5): 147-160.

Wei Zaijiang. Latest Development in Research on Conceptual Metonymy[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2023, 45(5): 147-160.

参考文献 38

[1]	AL-SHARAFI A G M. Textual Metonymy: A Semiotic Approach[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
[2]	BARCELONA A. General description of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project,with particular attention to the issues of hierarchy,prototypicality,and taxonomic domains[C]// BLANCO-CARRIONI O,BARCELONA A & PANNAIN R. Conceptual Metonymy:Methodological, Theoretical and Descriptive Issues. Amsterdam & Philadephia: Benjiamins Publishing Press, 2018:27-54.
[3]	BARCELONA A, BLANCO-CARRIÓN O & PANNAIN R. Introduction:The complex task of studying metonymy[C]//BLANCO-CARRIÓN O,BARCELONA A & PANNAIN R. Conceptual Metonymy:Methodological, Theoretical and Descriptive Issues. Amsterdam & Philadephia: Benjiamins Publishing Press, 2018:1-24.
[4]	BRDAR M. Metonymy in Grammar:Towards Motivating Extensions of Grammatical Categories and Constructions[D]. Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University, 2007.
[5]	BRDAR M & BRDAR-SZABÓ R. Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English,Croatian and Hungarian[C]//PANTHER K-U & THORNBURG L L. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003:241-266.
[6]	DENROCHE C. Metonymy and Language:A New Theory of Linguistic Processing[M]. New York: Routledge, 2015.
[7]	GIBBS R W Jr. Speaking and thinking with metonymy[C]//PANTHER K-U & RADDEN G. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999:61-76.
[8]	GOOSSENS L. Metaphtonymy:The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action[C]//DIRVEN R & PÖRINGS R. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002:349-378.
[9]	HERNÁNDEZ-GOMARIZ I. Analysis of metonymic triggers,metonymic chaining,and patterns of interaction with metaphor and with other metonymies as part of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project[C]//BLANCO-CARRIÓN O,BARCELONA A & PANNAIN R. Conceptual Metonymy:Methodological, Theoretical and Descriptive Issues. Amsterdam & Philadephia: Benjiamins Publishing Press, 2018:75-94.
[10]	HUANG S. Chinese as a metonymic language[C]//CHEN M & TSENG O. In Honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang:Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change. Taipei: Pyramid Press, 1994:223-252.
[11]	JAKOBSON R. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances[C]//JAKOBSON R & HALLE M. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague & Paris: Mouton, 1971:7-96.
[12]	LAKOFF G & JOHNSON M. Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press,1980.
[13]	LANGACKER R W. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009.
[14]	LITTLEMORE J. Metonymy:Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[15]	LITTLEMORE J. Metonymy[C]//DANCYGIER B. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017:407-422.
[16]	PANTHER K-U & RADDEN G. Introduction[C]//PANTHER K-U & RADDEN G. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjiamins Publishing Company, 1999:1-16.
[17]	PANTHER K-U & THORNBURG L L. Introduction:On the nature of conceptual metonymy[C]//PANTHER K-U & THORNBURG L L. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003:1-20.
[18]	PANTHER K-U, THORNBURG L L & BARCELONA A. Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009.
[19]	PANTHER K-U & THORNBURG L L. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?[C]//BLANCO-CARRIÓN O,BARCELONA A & PANNAIN R. Conceptual Metonymy:Methodological, Theoretical and Descriptive Issues. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjiamins Publishing Press, 2018:121-160.
[20]	RADDEN G. Molly married money:Reflections on conceptual metonymy[C]//BARCELONA A,BLANCO-CARRIONI O & PANNAIN R. Conceptual Metonymy:Methodological, Theoretical and Descriptive Issues. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjiamins Publishing Press, 2018:161-184.
[21]	RADDEN G & KÖVECSES Z. Towards a theory of metonymy[C]//PANTHER K-U & RADDEN G. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999:17-59.
[22]	RUIZ DE MENDOZA IBÁÑEZ F J & OTAL CAMPO J L. Metonymy, Grammar and Communication[M]. Granada: Comares, 2002.
[23]	RUIZ DE MENDOZA IBÁÑEZ F J & PÉREZ HERNÁNDEZ L. Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication[C]//PANTHER K-U & THORNBURG L L. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003:23-50.
[24]	TAYLOR J. Linguistic Categorization—Prototypes in Linguistic Theory[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1995.
[25]	VAN DIJK T A. Ideology:A Multidisciplinary Approach[M]. London: Sage Publications,1998.
[26]	WACHOWSKI W. Towards a Better Understanding of Metonymy[M]. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2019.
[27]	陈望道. 修辞学发凡[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2001.
[28]	韩陈其. 汉语借代义词典[Z]. 广州: 广东教育出版社,1995.
[29]	沈家煊. 转喻与转指[J]. 当代语言学, 1999(1):3-15.
[30]	束定芳. 认知语言学研究方法[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2013.
[31]	魏在江. 认知转喻学研究论纲[C]// 董洪川. 英语研究:文字与文化研究(第十四辑). 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2022:102-114.
[32]	吴淑琼. 基于汉语句法结构的语法转喻研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2013.
[33]	熊佳娟. 转喻的认知研究:汉语作为转喻的语言[D]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2007.
[34]	杨成虎. 语法转喻的认知研究[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2011.
[35]	杨成虎. 英汉语动宾结构的语法转喻研究[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2015.
[36]	袁毓林. 汉语中的概念转喻及其语法学后果[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2018(1):30-43.
[37]	张拱贵, 王福良, 王聚元, 等. 汉语代语词典[Z]. 南京: 江苏教育出版社,1993.
[38]	张辉, 卢卫中. 认知转喻[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2010.

概念转喻研究的理论前沿与发展动向

Latest Development in Research on Conceptual Metonymy

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王德亮. 基于对话句法的汉语会话分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(4): 134-148.
[2]	胡显耀. 翻译社会认知研究的概念、问题和方法——译者行为研究的新途径[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(4): 37-50.
[3]	刘佳, 陈士法, 官群, 赵轶平, 杨连瑞. 中国学习者纸笔手写对英语单词再认影响的实证研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(3): 103-119.
[4]	赵秀凤. 生态文明话语的社会认知研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(3): 29-44.
[5]	林正军, 夏士周. 概念语法隐喻的概念隐喻与概念转喻实现[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(3): 3-17.
[6]	程喜. 基于语式差异的英汉政治话语语法隐喻分布的对比研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(1): 129-145.
[7]	张辉. 批评认知语言学与主体间性[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(1): 30-49.
[8]	刘文宇, 徐博书. “容器”与“路径”——美国前副总统彭斯演讲的认知话语分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(1): 50-66.
[9]	颜冰, 张辉. 认知语法情境植入视角下企业信任话语建构策略分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(1): 67-79.
[10]	钟玲俐, 刘正光, 李思艺. 批评隐喻视角下外交话语中的“路”隐喻和国家身份构建——以习近平总书记系列对外演讲为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 114-132.
[11]	陈慧, 卢卫中. 中美媒体对中国形象隐喻建构的对比研究——以中美贸易战报道为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 133-147.
[12]	刘小红, 侯国金. 双关何以为构式：词汇—构式语用学视角[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 148-162.
[13]	孙毅, 李明明. 中国特色大国外交话语的意图隐喻甄别、理解与翻译[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 32-50.
[14]	汪徽, 辛斌, 程儒雅. 新闻语篇中隐喻的建构作用研究——美媒“美国退出TPP”报道的批评隐喻分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 68-90.
[15]	王寅. Talmy认知语义学的理论、实践和发展——体认语义学刍议[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(5): 14-26.