语言景观学的理论框架和研究方法

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.349

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

语言景观学关注公共空间中的多语及多模态沟通现象,旨在揭示公共标识牌背后的意识形态和身份认同等社会语言学课题。从语族活力和定量分布法,到都市语言学和民族志方法,当前国际语言景观研究已日趋深入,呈现出跨学科的发展态势。本文综合分析了语言景观的定义范围,梳理了语言景观研究的理论框架和研究方法,为国内的语言景观研究提供了新的分析维度,有助于我国学者从对标识牌语言的简单统计分类过渡到对语言景观构成深层次原因的探究。

关键词: 语言景观; 超级多样性; 都市语言学; 民族志方法; 符号资源

Abstract:

Linguistic landscapes originally referred to publicly presented and displayed language items, including street signs and shop names. The definition has recently been expanded to account for the use of various types of semiotic resources in public spaces. Focusing on multilingual and multimodal communication in superdiverse metropolitan cities, linguistic landscape studies have aimed to reveal sociolinguistic issues of ideology and identity through the analysis of public signage. Internationally, linguistic landscape research has moved away from the ethnolinguistic vitality theory and quantitative distribution analysis to adopting more in-depth and interdisciplinary perspectives, including metrolingualism and ethnography. However, linguistic landscape studies in the Chinese context still tend to focus on counting the frequency of language, categorizing signs and making speculative statements about sign makers. To further understand the complexity of linguistic landscapes, this paper offers a comprehensive review of the extant theories and approaches in the field, with a focus on superdiversity, metrolingualism and ethnography. It aims to provide new analytical perspectives for linguistic landscape researchers in China and additional references for further research into the underlying reasons for the structuration of linguistic landscape.

Keywords: linguistic landscape; superdiversity; metrolingualism; ethnography; semiotic resources

中图分类号:

H002

姚晓芳. 语言景观学的理论框架和研究方法[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(4): 101-115.

Yao Xiaofang. Theoretical Perspectives and Research Methods of Linguistic Landscape Studies[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2021, 43(4): 101-115.

参考文献 61

[1]	Arnaut K, Blommaert J, Rampton B, et al. Language and Superdiversity[M]. New York: Routledge, 2016.
[2]	Backhaus P. Linguistic Landscapes:A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo[M]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2007.
[3]	Ben-Rafael E, & Ben-Rafael M. Linguistic landscapes in an era of multiple globalizations[J]. Linguistic Landscape, 2015, 1(1-2):19-37.
[4]	Ben-Rafael E, Shohamy E, Amara M H, et al. Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space:The case of Israel[J]. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2006, 3(1):7-30. DOI URL
[5]	Blackwood R. LL explorations and methodological challenges:Analysing France’s regional languages[J]. Linguistic Landscape, 2015, 1(1-2):38-53.
[6]	Blommaert J. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[7]	Blommaert J. Ethnography,Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes:Chronicles of Complexity[M]. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2013.
[8]	Coluzzi P. Italian in the linguistic landscape of Kuala Lumpur(Malaysia)[J]. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2017, 14(2):109-123. DOI URL
[9]	Cook V. The language of the street[J]. Applied Linguistics Review, 2013, 4(1):43-81. DOI URL
[10]	Curtin M L. Languages on display:Indexical signs,identities and the linguistic landscape of Taipei[C]// Shohamy E & Gorter D. Linguistic Landscape:Expanding the Scenery. New York: Routledge, 2009:221-269.
[11]	Edelman L. The presence of minority languages in linguistic landscapes in Amsterdam and Friesland (the Netherlands)[J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2014, 228:7-28.
[12]	García O, & Li Wei. Translanguaging:Language,Bilingualism and Education[M]. London: Palgrave Pivot, 2014.
[13]	Giles H, Bourhis R Y, & Taylor D M,. Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations[C]//Giles H. Language,Ethnicity,and Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press, 1977:307-348.
[14]	Hult F M. Drive-thru linguistic landscaping:Constructing a linguistically dominant place in a bilingual space[J]. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2014, 18(5):507-523. DOI URL
[15]	Jaspers J, & Madsen L M. Sociolinguistics in a languagised world:Introduction[J]. Applied Linguistics Review, 2016, 7(3):235-258. DOI URL
[16]	Jaworski A. Mobile language in mobile places[J]. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2014, 18(5):524-533. DOI URL
[17]	Jaworski A, & Thurlow C. Semiotic Landscapes:Language,Image,Space[M]. London: Continuum International, 2010.
[18]	Jaworski A, & Yeung S. Life in the garden of Eden:The naming and imagery of residential Hong Kong[C]// Shohamy E,Ben-Rafael E & Barni M. Linguistic Landscape in the City. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2010:153-181.
[19]	Jørgensen J N, & Møller J S. Polylingualism and languaging[C]//Leung C & Street B V. The Routledge Companion to English Studies. London:Routledge, 2014:67-83.
[20]	Lai M L. The linguistic landscape of Hong Kong after the change of sovereignty[J]. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2013, 10(3):251-272. DOI URL
[21]	Lamarre P. Bilingual winks and bilingual wordplay in Montreal’s linguistic landscape[J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2014, 228:131-151.
[22]	Landry R, & Bourhis R Y. Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality:An empirical study[J]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1997, 16(1):23-49. DOI URL
[23]	Lanza E, & Woldemariam H. Indexing modernity:English and branding in the linguistic landscape of Addis Ababa[J]. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2014, 18(5):491-506. DOI URL
[24]	Lou J J. Spaces of consumption and senses of place:A geosemiotic analysis of three markets in Hong Kong[J]. Social Semiotics, 2017, 27(4):513-531. DOI URL
[25]	Lyons K, & Rodríguez-Ordóñez I. Quantifying the linguistic landscape:A study of Spanish-English variation in Pilsen,Chicago[J]. Spanish in Context, 2017, 14(3):329-362. DOI URL
[26]	Maly I. Detecting social changes in times of superdiversity:An ethnographic linguistic landscape analysis of Ostend in Belgium[J]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2016, 42(5):703-723. DOI URL
[27]	Manan S A, David M K, Dumanig F P, et al. Politics, economics and identity:Mapping the linguistic landscape of Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia[J]. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2015, 12(1):31-50. DOI URL
[28]	Milani T M. Sexed signs-queering the scenery[J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2014, 228:201-225.
[29]	Møller J S. Metrolingualism:Language in the City[J]. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2017, 21(1):146-150. DOI URL
[30]	Pappenhagen R, Scarvaglieri C, & Redder A. Expanding the linguistic landscape scenery?Action theory and ‘Linguistic Soundscaping’[C]// Blackwood R J,Lanza E & Woldemariam H. Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016:147-162.
[31]	Pennycook A, & Otsuji E. Market lingos and metrolingua francas[J]. International Multilingual Research Journal, 2014, 8(4):255-270. DOI URL
[32]	Pennycook A, & Otsuji E. Metrolingualism:Language in the City[M]. New York: Routledge, 2015.
[33]	Rowland L. English in the Japanese linguistic landscape:A motive analysis[J]. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2016, 37(1):40-55. DOI URL
[34]	Schneider B. A. Pennycook and E. Otsuji:Metrolingualism:Language in the City[J]. Multilingua, 2017, 36(1):113-118.
[35]	Scollon R, & Scollon S W. Discourses in Place:Language in the Material World[M]. London:Routledge, 2003.
[36]	Scollon R, & Scollon S W. Nexus analysis:Refocusing ethnography on action[J]. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2007, 11(5):608-625. DOI URL
[37]	Shang Guowen, & Zhao Shouhui. Bottom-up multilingualism in Singapore:Code choice on shop signs[J]. English Today, 2017, 33(3):8-14. DOI URL
[38]	Shohamy E. LL research as expanding language and language policy[J]. Linguistic Landscape, 2015, 1(1-2):152-171.
[39]	Stroud C, & Jegels D. Semiotic landscapes and mobile narrations of place:Performing the local[J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2014, 228:179-199.
[40]	Stroud C, & Mpendukana S. Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape:Multilingualism,mobility and space in a South African township[J]. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2009, 13(3):363-386. DOI URL
[41]	Tan P K W. Singapore’s balancing act,from the perspective of the linguistic landscape[J]. SOJOURN:Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 2014, 29(2):438-466. DOI URL
[42]	Taylor-Leech K J. Language choice as an index of identity:Linguistic landscape in Dili,Timor-Leste[J]. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2012, 9(1):15-34. DOI URL
[43]	Vandenbroucke M. Multilingualism,urban change and gentrification in the landscape of a Brussels neighbourhood[J]. Multilingua, 2017, 37(1):25-52. DOI URL
[44]	Wang Xiaomei, & Van de Velde H. Constructing identities through multilingualism and multiscriptualism:The linguistic landscape in Dutch and Belgian Chinatowns[J]. Journal of Chinese Overseas, 2015, 11(2):119-145. DOI URL
[45]	Wetzel P J. Public signs as narrative in Japan[J]. Japanese Studies, 2010, 30(3):325-342. DOI URL
[46]	陈路瑶. 从语言景观透视空间商品化:以上海南京路步行街为例[J]. 语言政策与语言教育, 2016(2):1-12,120.
[47]	葛俊丽. 语言与空间:语言景观研究视角[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2016, 38(4):68-80,134.
[48]	李丽生. 国外语言景观研究评述及其启示[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2015, 37(4):1-7.
[49]	林小径. 汕头市商店标牌语言景观研究[J]. 现代语文(语言研究版), 2017(9):105-109.
[50]	刘楚群. 语言景观之城市映像研究[J]. 语言战略研究, 2017, 2(2):20-26.
[51]	刘慧. 印尼华族集聚区语言景观与族群认同--以峇淡、坤甸、北干巴鲁三地为例[J]. 语言战略研究, 2016, 1(1):42-49.
[52]	邱莹. 上饶市语言景观调查研究[J]. 语言文字应用, 2016(3):40-49.
[53]	尚国文, 赵守辉. 语言景观研究的视角、理论与方法[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2014a, 46(2):214-223,320.
[54]	尚国文, 赵守辉. 语言景观的分析维度与理论构建[J]. 外国语, 2014b, 37(6):81-89.
[55]	苏杰. 上海私人标牌中的语言权势与文化权势[J]. 语言战略研究, 2017, 2(2):27-34.
[56]	田飞洋, 张维佳. 全球化社会语言学:语言景观研究的新理论--以北京市学院路双语公示语为例[J]. 语言文字应用, 2014(2):38-45.
[57]	巫喜丽, 战菊. 全球化背景下广州市“非洲街”语言景观实探[J]. 外语研究, 2017, 34(2):6-11,112.
[58]	杨若蕖, 张爱萍. “兰州国际马拉松赛”多模态语言景观调查研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(6):40-51.
[59]	俞玮奇, 王婷婷, 孙亚楠. 国际化大都市外侨聚居区的多语景观实态--以北京望京和上海古北为例[J]. 语言文字应用, 2016(1):36-44.
[60]	章柏成. 国内语言景观研究的进展与前瞻[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015(12):14-18,77.
[61]	张媛媛, 张斌华. 语言景观中的澳门多语状况[J]. 语言文字应用, 2016(1):45-54.