语用学研究前瞻

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.447

北京第二外国语学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 137-148.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.447

语用学研究前瞻

陈新仁¹(), 何刚²(), 毛延生³(), 冉永平⁴(), 于国栋⁵(), 吴亚欣⁵(), 姜晖⁶(), 任伟⁷(), 谢朝群⁸()

1.南京大学大学，南京 210023
2.华东师范大学外国语学院，上海 200241
3.哈尔滨工程大学，哈尔滨 150001
4.广东外语外贸大学，广东 510420
5.中国海洋大学外国语学院，青岛 266100
6.辽宁师范大学外国语学院，大连 116029
7.北京航空航天大学外国语学院，北京 100083
8.浙江外国语学院，杭州 310023

收稿日期:2023-02-17 出版日期:2023-04-30 发布日期:2023-05-11
作者简介:陈新仁，南京大学大学外语部/外国语学院教授，博士生导师，210023，研究方向：语用学理论与应用。电子邮箱：chenxr1010@163.com
何刚，华东师范大学外国语学院教授，博士生导师，200241，研究方向：文化语用学。电子邮箱： hegman2@163.com
毛延生，哈尔滨工程大学外国语学院教授，博士生导师，150001，研究方向：语用学理论与应用。电子邮箱：wiltonmao@163.com
冉永平，广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心教授，博士生导师，510420，研究方向：语用学与话语分析。电子邮箱：ranyongping@hotmail.com
于国栋，中国海洋大学外国语学院教授，博士生导师，266100，研究方向：会话分析理论与应用。电子邮箱：yuguodong@ouc.edu.cn
吴亚欣，中国海洋大学外国语学院教授，博士生导师，266100，研究方向：会话分析理论与应用。电子邮箱：wuyaxin@ouc.edu.cn
姜晖，辽宁师范大学外国语学院教授，硕士生导师，116029，研究方向：语用学与外语教学。电子邮箱：daisyjiang1971@163.com
任伟，北京航空航天大学外国语学院教授，博士生导师，100083，研究方向：语用学、二语习得。电子邮箱：weiren@buaa.edu.cn
谢朝群，浙江外国语学院中外话语语用研究院院长，教授，310023，研究方向：网络语用学。电子邮箱：xie_chaoqun@foxmail.com
基金资助:
受冉永平教授主持的2021年国家社会科学基金项目“社会—语用共同体视域下网络和谐话语体系建构及引导机制研究”(21AYY011)

Pragmatics in Prospect

Chen Xinren¹(), He Gang²(), Mao Yansheng³(), Ran Yongping⁴(), Yu Guodong⁵(), Wu Yaxin⁵(), Jiang Hui⁶(), Ren Wei⁷(), Xie Chaoqun⁸()

1. Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
2. East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
3. Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
4. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China
5. Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
6. Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
7. Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China
8. Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou 310023, China

Received:2023-02-17 Online:2023-04-30 Published:2023-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

语用学是一门理论繁杂却又十分接地气的语言学科，近段时期发展迅猛、生机盎然。正如《语用学新发展研究》（陈新仁著，2021年清华大学出版社出版）中所展现的那样，该学科近十余年来在理论和应用等方面都取得了长足的发展。总体来看，语用学发展至少呈现出以下几个明显的趋势：①更加关注各类社会语境中的语言使用，包括虚拟空间和公共空间等语境中的语用问题，而非仅仅研究日常个体之间的语言使用；②更加频繁地使用其他学科的相关理论开展语用学跨学科研究；③更加注重引入社会建构论视角研究语言礼貌、面子、身份、立场、形象和信任等超学科议题；④更加强调融合多主体（如说话人、听话人、旁观者、评论者）的视角开展话语互动的分析；⑤更加强调多语境因素（如交际情境、序列语境/文本语境、社会文化语境）融合的分析；⑥更加注重定性研究或定性和定量研究相结合的研究方式；⑦更加注重多模态话语分析。为了帮助广大语用学爱好者尤其是刚刚踏入语用学研究领域的年轻学者更好地、更具体地把握语用学今后或未来的发展脉络，更加敏锐地捕捉有价值、有意义的话题与课题，我们特别邀请了国内多位语用学专家分享他们对语用学一些具体分支领域的前瞻。

关键词: 文化语用学; 人际语用学; 会话分析; 元语用; 二语语用; 网络语用学

Abstract:

Pragmatics is an extremely down-to-earth linguistic discipline despite having complex theories. It has made tremendous progress in theory and application in the last decade, as evidenced by the clear trends toward paying more attention to the use of language in various social contexts and using relevant theories from other disciplines more frequently to conduct interdisciplinary research. In addition, greater importance is being attached to social constructivism in the study of transdisciplinary issues such as linguistic politeness, face, identity, stance, image, and trust, as well as more emphasis being placed on integrating the perspectives of multiple subjects, such as speakers, listeners, bystanders, and commentators, in the analysis of interactions. Furthermore, more stress is being placed on the integration of multi-contextual factors, such as the communicative context, the sequential context/co-text, and the sociocultural context, as well as on a preference for qualitative research or a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods, and the use of multimodal discourse analyses.

Keywords: cultural pragmatics; interpersonal pragmatics; conversation analysis; metapragmatics; second language pragmatics; Internet pragmatics

中图分类号:

H030

陈新仁, 何刚, 毛延生, 冉永平, 于国栋, 吴亚欣, 姜晖, 任伟, 谢朝群. 语用学研究前瞻[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(2): 137-148.

Chen Xinren, He Gang, Mao Yansheng, Ran Yongping, Yu Guodong, Wu Yaxin, Jiang Hui, Ren Wei, Xie Chaoqun. Pragmatics in Prospect[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2023, 45(2): 137-148.

参考文献 42

	文化语用学研究推荐书目（何刚、毛延生）：
[1]	BRØGGER F C. Culture,Language,Text:Culture Studies within the Study of English as a Foreign Language[M]. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1992.
[2]	SHARIFIAN F. Cultural Linguistics:Cultural Conceptualizations and Language[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017:151.
[3]	何刚. 美国话语的文化语用推理试探[J]. 外国语, 2018(4):54-65.
[4]	何刚. 全球领导力话语建构的文化语用路径:以习近平讲话为范本[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019(3):5-15.
[5]	毛延生, 何刚. 中国语用学研究范式的自觉、批评与优化——来自解放语用学的启示[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022(1):94-103.
	人际语用学研究推荐书目（冉永平）：
[6]	ARENDHOLZ J. (In)Appropriate Online Behavior[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2013.
[7]	BLUM-KULKA S, HOUSE J & KASPER G. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics:Requests and Apologies[C]. New Jersey: Ablex, 1989.
[8]	BROWN P & LEVINSON S C. Universals in language usage:Politeness phenomena[C]//GOODY E N. Questions and Politeness. Cambridge:CUP, 1978:56-289.
[9]	BROWN P & LEVINSON S C. Politeness:Some Universals in Language Usage[M]. Cambridge: CUP, 1987.
[10]	CULPEPER J & HAUGH M. Pragmatics and the English Language[M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
[11]	FÉLIX-BRASDEFER J C. The Language of Service Encounters[M]. Cambridge: CUP, 2015.
[12]	LEECH G N. The Principles of Pragmatics[M]. London: Longman, 1983.
[13]	LOCHER M A & GRAHAM S L. Interpersonal Pragmatics[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2010.
[14]	O’DRISCOLL J. The role of language in interpersonal pragmatics[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, 58:170-181. DOI URL
[15]	WIERZBICKA A. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics:The Semantics of Human Interaction[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003.
[16]	雷容. 人际语用学视域下网络话语研究的新趋势[J]. 现代外语, 2022(5):710-720.
[17]	冉永平, 刘平. 多元文化背景下的交互文化语用学[J]. 中国外语, 2018(4):27-33.
	会话分析研究推荐书目（于国栋、吴亚欣）：
[18]	DREW P, CHATWIN J & COLLINS S. Conversation analysis:A method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals[J]. Health Expectations, 2001(1):58-70.
[19]	HERITAGE J & ROBINSON J D. ‘Some’ versus ‘any’ medical issues:Encouraging patients to reveal their unmet concerns[C]//ANTAKI C. Applied Conversation Analysis:Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011:15-31.
[20]	KENDRICK K H & TORREIRA F. The timing and construction of preference:A quantitative study[J]. Discourse Processes, 2015(4):255-289.
[21]	ROBERTS S G, TORREIRA F & LEVINSON S C. The effects of processing and sequence organization on the timing of turn taking:A corpus study[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6:509.
[22]	SCHEGLOFF E A. Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation[J]. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 1993(1):99-128.
[23]	WU Yaxin & YU Guodong. Action ascription and action assessment:Ya-suffixed answers to questions in Mandarin conversation[C]//DEPPERMANN A & HAUGH M. Action Ascription in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022:234-255.
	元语用研究推荐书目（姜晖、陈新仁）：
[24]	BUBLITZ W & HÜBLER A. Metapragmatics in Use[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007.
[25]	CAFFI C. Metapragmatics[C]//ASHER R. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford:Pergamon, 1994:2461-2466.
[26]	CAFFI C. Revisiting metapragmatics:‘What are we talking about?’[C]//ALLAN K,CAPONE A & KECSKES I. Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Switzerland:Springer, 2016:799-821.
[27]	CHEN X R. Metapragmatics and the Chinese Language[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022.
[28]	CULPEPER J & HAUGH M. Pragmatics and the English Language[M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
[29]	LUCY J. Reflexive Language:Reported Speech and Metapragmatics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[30]	MEY J. Pragmatics:An Introduction[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1993.
[31]	SILVERSTEIN M. Shifters,linguistic categories,and cultural description[C]//BASSO K H & SELBY H A. Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1976:11-56.
[32]	VERSCHUEREN J. Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use[J]. Pragmatics, 2000(4):439-456.
[33]	陈新仁. 基于元语用的元话语分类新拟[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2020(4):1-10,24.
[34]	姜晖. 语言学中的meta术语及其相关性研究[J]. 外国语文, 2013(6):100-104.
	二语语用研究推荐书目（任伟）：
[35]	REN W. Second Language Pragmatics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
[36]	TAGUCHI N & ROEVER C. Second Language Pragmatics[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[37]	陈新仁, 李民, 等. 二语语用能力理论与测试研究[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2022.
	网络语用学研究推荐书目（谢朝群）：
[38]	HERRING S C, STEIN D & VIRTANEN T. Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013.
[39]	HOFFMAN C R & BUBLITZ W. Pragmatics of Social Media[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2017.
[40]	XIE Chaoqun. (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2020.
[41]	XIE Chaoqun, YUS F & HABERLAND H. Approaches to Internet Pragmatics:Theory and Practice[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2021.
[42]	YUS F. Cyberpragmatics:Internet-mediated Communication in Context[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.

语用学研究前瞻

Pragmatics in Prospect

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 42

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王德亮. 基于对话句法的汉语会话分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(4): 134-148.
[2]	于国栋. 也谈互动语言学研究——兼与郑娟曼商榷[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(4): 92-106.
[3]	于国栋. 请求作为伤面子行为的会话佐证[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(4): 3-19.
[4]	郭恩华　张德禄. 基于会话分析的多模态交际研究探索——论序列分析在CA多模态交际研究中的应用[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2017, 39(3): 31-45.