Please wait a minute...
北京第二外国语学院学报  2015, Vol. 37 Issue (4): 8-    
语言学研究     
基于语段一致性运算和非同步拼读的约束条件效应
张连文
山东农业大学外国语学院 山东泰安 271018
Binding Condition Effects based on Phasal Agree and Non-simultaneous Spell-Out
Zhang Lianwen
Shandong Agricultural University,Taian 271018,China
 全文: PDF(8334 KB)   [HTML]()
摘要: 本文在Chomsky的语段理论(PT)和非同步拼读语段以及特征一致性理论的基础上,结合语段不可穿透条件(PIC)等局部性制约,严格界定并分析了推导约束原则A的LF语段局部约束域,旨在进一步论证照应语/回指语在局部域的最小LF语段(vP,不定式TP,nP)内受到成分统制先行语的约束,约束条件是由携带可解释φ-特征的探针[Var:x]与目标携带不可解释/未赋值变量[Var:_]特征的一致性确立。代词在最小PF语段(DP)内不受约束 。论文还结合Landau(2010)和Jackendoff(1972)的研究,试图解决心理谓词和体验者句式中照应约束等问题,进一步分析了基于语段一致性与特征共享的约束条件效应,证明了语段理论约束条件效应A、B的差别归于语段拼读的非同步性。
关键词: 语段理论约束条件效应一致性理论局部域LF语段    
Abstract:
Based on Chomsky’s(2001,2008 et seq.)phase theory(PT),non-simultaneous spell-out phases(Maruši?,2009), and φ-feature probe-goal Agree(p-g) theory(Miyagawa,2010;Reuland,2011)and locality constraints(e.g.,PIC),this paper properly and systematically investigates the LF phase and PF phase local binding domains for binding conditions A,B respectively.Particularly, anaphors are bound by the c-commanding antecedents in the local domain of minimal LF phases(vP,non-finite TP,nP),and the binding condition is established by the agreement between the probe [Var:x] bearing interpretable φ-features and the goal with uninterpretable/unvalued variable feature [Var:_].Whereas pronouns are free of binding by c-commanding DPs unbound in local domains of minimal PF phases(DP, subject-less nP),but can be bound in minimal LF phases.Moreover,this paper attempts to solve the anaphoric bindings in psychological predicates and experiencer constructions in Jackendoff(1972).Additionally,this article further elucidates the binding effects based on phasal agreement and feature sharing.The difference between binding effects A & B in PT can be attributed to the non-simultaneity of spell-out and Agree(p-g) operations.
 
 
 
 
Key words: phase theory(PT)    binding condition effects    Agree    local domain    LF & PF phases
收稿日期: 2015-02-26 出版日期: 2018-03-20
作者简介: 张连文(1975— ),男,山东烟台人,博士,山东农业大学教授,主要研究方向:句法学、语义学。
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
张连文

引用本文:

张连文. 基于语段一致性运算和非同步拼读的约束条件效应[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2015, 37(4): 8-.

Zhang Lianwen. Binding Condition Effects based on Phasal Agree and Non-simultaneous Spell-Out. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2015, 37(4): 8-.

链接本文:

https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/        https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2015/V37/I4/8

[1]Adger,D.A Minimalist theory of feature structure [A].In A.Kibort & G.G.Corbett.Features : Perspectives on a key Notion in Linguistics[C]. Oxford :Oxford Univerity Press,2010 :185—218. 
[2]Berwick,R. & N. Chomsky. The Biolinguistic Program:The Current State of its Evolution[A].In A. M. DiSciullo & C. Boeckx(eds.). The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human language Faculty[C].Oxford : OUP,2011 :19—41.
[3]Bobaljik,J. D. & S. Wurmbrand.The Domain of Agreement[J].Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,2005(23):809—865.
[4]Boeckx,C.Aspects of the Syntax of Agreement [M].New York :Routledge,2008.
[5]Boeckx,C.,N.Hornstein & J.Nunes.Control as Movement[M].Cambridge :CUP,2010.
[6]Carsten,V.Multiple Agreement,Case Deletion : Against φ(in)completeness[J].Syntax,2001(4): 79—100.
[7]Chomsky,N.The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory[M].NY :Plenum Press,1975.
[8]Chomsky,N.On binding[J].Linguistic Inquiry, 1980(1):1—46.
[9]Chomsky,N.Lectures on Government and Binding [M].Dordrecht :Foris,1981.
[10]Chomsky,N.Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding[M]. Cambridge,MA :MIT Press,1982.
[11]Chomsky,N.A minimalist program for linguistic theory[A].In K.Hale and S.J.Keyser(eds.). The View from Building 20[C].Cambridge, Mass :MIT Press,1993 :1—52.
[12]Chomsky,N.The Minimalist Program[M]. Cambridge,Mass :The MIT Press,1995.
[13]Chomsky,N.Minimalist Inquiries :The Framework [A].In R.Martin,D.Michaels & J.Uriagereka (eds.).Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik[C].Cambridge,Mass : MIT Press,2000 :89—155.
[14]Chomsky,N.Derivation by phase[A].In M. Kenstowicz(ed.).Ken Hale: A life in language [C].Cambridge,Mass :MIT Press,2001 :1—52.
[15]Chomsky,N.Beyond Explanatory Adequacy [A].In A.Belletti(ed.).Structures and Beyond— The Cartography of Syntactic Structure vol 3[C]. Oxford :OUP,2004 :104—131.
[16]Chomsky,N.Three Factors in Language Design [J].Linguistic Inquiry,2005(1):1—22.
[17]Chomsky,N.Approaching UG from Below [A].In U.Sauerland & H-M.Gärtner(eds.). Interfaces+Recursion=Languages?[C].NY : Mouton de Gruter,2007 :1—29.
[18]Chomsky,N.On phases[A].In R.Freidin,C. Otero & M. L.Zubizaretta(eds.).Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory[C].Cambridge,MA : MIT Press,2008 :133—166.
[19]Chomsky,N.Problems of projection[J].Lingua, 2013(130):33—49.
[20]Citko,B.Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move and Labels[M].Cambridge :CUP,2011.
[21]Citko,B.Phase Theory. An Introduction[M]. Cambridge :CUP,2014.
[22]Corbett,G.G.Features :essential notions[A]. In A.Kibort & G.G.Corbett(eds.).Features: Perspectives on a key Notion in Linguistics[C]. Oxford :OUP,2010 :17—36.
[23]Delfitto,D.& G.Fiorin.Person Features and Pronominal Anaphora[J].Linguistic Inquiry,2011(2):193—224.
[24]Delmonte,R.Computational Linguistic Text Processing: Lexicon, Grammar, Parsing and Anaphora Resolution[M].New York :Nova Science Publishers Inc,2008.
[25]den Dikken,M. Phase Extension :Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction [J].Theoretical Linguistics,2007(33):1—41.
[26]Dillon,B. W. Structure Access in Sentence Comprehension[D].PhD.dissertation , University of Maryland,2011.
[27]Di Sciullo,A. M. A Biolinguistic Approach to Variation[A].In A. M. Di Sciullo & C.Boeckx (eds.).The Biolinguistic Enterprise[C].Oxford : OUP,2011 :305—326.
[28]Di Sciullo,A. Maria. & C. Boeckx. The Biolinguistic Enterprise[C]. Oxford :OUP,2011.
[29]Fitch,W.T.& M.D.Hauser.Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate[J].Science ,2004(303):377—380.
[30]Fox,D.Economy and Semantic Interpretation [M].Cambridge,Mass :The MIT Press,2000.
[31]Fox,D.& J.Nissenbaum.Condition A and Scope Reconstruction[J].LI,2004(35):475—485.
[32]Gallego,Á.J.Phase Theory[M].Amsterdam : John Benjamins,2010a.
[33]Gallego,Á.J.Binding through Agree[J]. Linguistic Analysis,2010b(34):163—192.
[34]Gallego,Á.J.(ed.).Phases: Developing the Framework[C].Berlin :Mouton de Gruyter,2012.
[35]Grohmann,K.K.(ed.).Explorations of Phase Theory: Features and Arguments[C].Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter,2009a.
[36]Grohmann,K.K.(ed.).Explorations of Phase Theory: Interpretations at the Interfaces[C]. Berlin :Mouton de Gruyter,2009b.
[37]Grohmann,K.K.(ed.).InterPhases[C]. Oxford :Oxford University Press,2009c.
[38]Grosz,B.J.et al.Centering :a framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse[J]. Computational Linguistics,1995(2):203—226.
[39]Guéron,J.Coreference Violations‘ Beyond Principle B’[A].In J. Bayer et al.( eds.). Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages[C].Amsterdam :John Benjamins,2007 :109—125.
[40]Heinat,F.Probes, Pronoun and Binding in the Minimalist Program[D].Doctoral Dissertation, Lund University,2006.
[41]Hicks,G.Why the Binding Theory doesn’t Apply at LF[J].Syntax,2008(3):255—280.
[42]Hicks,G.The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations [M].Amsterdam :John Benjamins,2009.
[43]Higginbotham,J.Tense, Aspect, and Indexicality [M].Oxford :OUP,2009.
[44]Holen,G.I.Automatic Anaphora Resolution for Norwegian(ARN)[A].In A.Branco(ed.). Anaphora: Analysis, Algortihms and Applications [C].Berlin :Springer,2007 :151—166.
[45]Hornstein,N.Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal[M].Oxford :Blackwell,2001.
[46]Hornstein,N.A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar[M]. Cambridge :CUP,2009.
[47]Huang,C.-T.J.Between Syntax and Semantics [M].New York :Routledge,2010.
[48]Huang,C.-T.J.& C.-C.J.Tang.The local nature of long-distance reflexive in Chinese[A]. In J.Koster & E.Reuland(eds.).Long-distance anaphora[C].Cambridge :CUP,1991 :263—282.
[49]Huang,C.-T.J.et al.The Syntax of Chinese [M].Cambridge :CUP,2009.
[50]Jackendoff,R.Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar[M].Cambridge :MIT Press,1972.
[51]Kayne,R.S.Pronouns and their antecedents [A].In S.D.Epstein & T.D.Seely(eds.). Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program [C].Malden,MA :Blackwell,2002 :133—166.
[52]Kazanina,N.The Acquisition and Processing of Backwards Anaphora[D].PhD dissertation, University of Maryland,2005.
[53]Keller,F.& A.Asudeh.Constraints on linguistic coreference :Structural vs.pragmatic factors[A]. In J. D.Moore & K.Stenning(eds.).Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society[C].Mahawah :Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001 :483—488.
[54]Kinsella,A.R.Language Evolution and Syntactic Theory[M].Cambridge :CUP,2009.
[55]Krifka,M.Response particles as propositional anaphors[J].Proceeddings of SALT,2013(23):1—18.
[56]Landau,I.The Locative Syntax of Experiencers [M].Cambridge :CUP,2010.
[57]Larson,R.Clauses,Propositions and Phases [A].In A. M.Di Sciullo & C.Boeckx(eds.). The Biolinguistic Enterprise[C].Oxford :OUP, 2011 :366—391.
[58]Lasnik,H.What kind of computing device is the human language faculty?[A].In A.M.Di Sciullo& C.Boeckx(eds.).The Biolinguistic Enterprise[C].Oxford :OUP,2011 :354—365.
[59]Lee-Schoenfeld,V.Binding by Phase :(Non-) complementarity in German[J].Journal of Germanic Linguistics,2004(16):111—173.
[60]Lee-Schoenfeld,V.Binding,Phases,and Locality [J].Syntax,2008(3):281—298.
[61]Legate,J.A.Some Interface Properties of the Phase [J].Linguistic Inquiry,2003(34):506—516.
[62]Manzini,M.R.Locality: A Theory and Some of its Empirical Consequences[M].Cambridge,Mass : The MIT Press,1992.
[63]Marantz,A.Phases and words[A].In Sook- Hee Choe(ed.).Phases in the Theory of Grammar [C].Seoul :Dong In,2008 :191—222.
[64]Marušič,F.L.Non-Simultaneous Spell-Out in the Clausal and Nominal Domain[A].In K. K. Grohmann(ed.).Interphases[C].Oxford : OUP,2009 :151—181.
[65]Matushansky,O.Going through a phase[A].In M.McGinnis & N.Richards(eds.).Perspectives on Phases. MIT Working papers in Linguistics 49[C]. Cambridge,MA :MIT Press,2005 :157—181.
[66]Mitkov,R. et al. Anaphora Resolution :To What Extent Does It Help NLP Applications[A].In A. Branco (ed.). Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications [C].Berlin :Springer,2007 :179—190.
[67]Miyagawa,S.Why Agree? Why Move?[M]. Cambridge,Mass :The MIT Press,2010.
[68]Pesetsky,D.Binding problems with experiencer verbs [J].Linguistic Inquiry,1987(1):126—140.
[69]Pesetsky,D.Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Casacades [M].Cambridge,Mass :MIT Press,1995.
[70]Pesetsky,D.Phrasal Movement and Its Discontents: Diseases and Diagnoses[A].In Lisa L. S. Cheng & N.Corver(eds.).Diagnosing Syntax[C]. Oxford :OUP,2013 :123—157.
[71]Quicoli,A .C.Anaphora by Phase[J].Syntax, 2008(3):299—329.
[72]Reuland,E.Primitives of binding[J].Linguistic Inquiry,2001(3):439—492.
[73]Reuland,E.Agreeing to bind[A].In H. Broekhuis et al. (eds.).Organizing Grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemmsdijk [C].Berlin :Mouton de gruyter,2005 :505—513.
[74]Reuland,E.Anaphora and Language Design[M]. Cambridge,Mass :MIT Press,2011.
[75]Rezac,M.φ-Agree Versus φ-Feature Movement : Evidence from Floating Quantifiers[J].Linguistic Inquiry,2010(3):496—508.
[76]Rizzi,L.Some Elements of Syntactic Computations [A].In D.Bickerton & E.Szathmáry(eds.). Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax[C]. Cambridge,Mass :MIT Press,2009 :63—87.
[77]Rubin,E.J.Determining Pair-Merge[J]. Linguistic Inquiry,2003(4):660—668.
[78]Sauerland,U.DP is Not a Scope Island[J]. Linguistic Inquiry,2005(2):303—314.
[79]Sauerland,U. & P.Elbourne.Total Reconstruction, PF Movement,and Derivational Order[J]. Linguistic Inquiry,2002(2):283—319.
[80]Schmelzer,L.S.Iron Range English long-distance reflexives[D].Ph.D.Dissertation,University of Minnesota,2011.
[81]Svenonius,P. On the edge[A].In D. Adger,C. de Cat & G. Tsoulas.Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and Their Effects[C].Dordrecht :Kluwer,2004 : 261—287.
[82]Uriagereka,J.Multiple spell-out[A].In S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein(eds.).Working Minimalism [C].Cambridge,MA :MIT Press,1999 :251—282.
[83]Uriagereka,J.Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program [M].Oxford :OUP,2012.
[84]何宏华.严格辖域原则——基于语链理论的辖域释义[J].外语教学与研究,2004(2):97—104.
[85]张连文.依存消解、一致性计算与浮现和语段计算理论[J].外语学刊,2011(1):38—53.
[86]张连文.基于语段计算框架的句法——韵律接口效应[J].外语学刊,2013a(1):21—36.
[87]张连文.最简推导的严格循环与语段边界效应 [J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2013b(6):1—10.
[88]张连文.基于语义解释和语段理论的否定模态与辖域计算[J].外语研究,2014(1):8—20.

 
No related articles found!