Please wait a minute...
北京第二外国语学院学报  2021, Vol. 43 Issue (1): 110-120    DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.323
书评     
《概念转喻:方法、理论和描写问题》评介
杜凤娇(), 刘志远()
北京语言大学,北京 100083
A Review of Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, Theoretical, and Descriptive Issues
Du Fengjiao(), Liu Zhiyuan()
Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, China
 全文: PDF(7185 KB)   HTML
摘要:

由Olga Blanco-Carrión、Antonio Barcelona、Rossella Pannain共同主编的《概念转喻:方法、理论和描写问题》围绕转喻数据库的建立,对转喻进行了较为系统的研究。本文首先介绍该论著的三部分内容,即转喻数据库的设计和实施问题、转喻的一些基本属性特征研究和语言中转喻的普遍性,然后总结该书在转喻研究方法和转喻理论研究方面为推进转喻研究所做的主要工作和贡献。该论著是转喻研究的最新成果,不仅提出了对转喻进行系统研究的方法,也为转喻理论研究指出了许多新的研究论题,值得学界关注和思考。

关键词: 概念转喻转喻数据库转喻理论转喻描写方法转喻分类    
Abstract:

Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, and Descriptive Issues (2018), edited by Olga Blanco-Carrión, Antonio Barcelona, and Rossella Pannain, suggests a more systematic research approach to metonymy based on the creation of a metonymy database. This paper introduces the three main contents in this book, namely issues in the design and/or implementation of a metonymy database, some general properties of metonymy, and the ubiquity of metonymy in languages. This paper also makes a brief comment about the main creativities of the book. As the latest achievement in metonymy theory, this book not only proposes methods of systematic research for metonymy, but also raises many new issues that should be the focus of academia.

Key words: conceptual metonymy    metonymy database    theory of metonymy    descriptive methods of metonymy    typology of metonymy
收稿日期: 2020-05-28 出版日期: 2021-02-28
PACS:  H002  
基金资助: 国家社会科学基金重大项目“汉语文本可读性测评和分级的跨学科研究”(17ZDA305);北京语言大学梧桐创新平台项目“汉语第二语言词汇教学的实证研究创新平台”(中央高校基本科研业务专项资金,20PT01)
作者简介: 杜凤娇,北京语言大学汉语国际教育研究院,100083,研究方向:汉语词汇及词汇教学。电子邮箱:2294648856@qq.com
刘志远,北京语言大学汉语国际教育研究院,100083,研究方向:汉语词汇及词汇教学。电子邮箱:17801190163@163.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
杜凤娇
刘志远

引用本文:

杜凤娇, 刘志远. 《概念转喻:方法、理论和描写问题》评介[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(1): 110-120.

Du Fengjiao, Liu Zhiyuan. A Review of Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, Theoretical, and Descriptive Issues. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2021, 43(1): 110-120.

链接本文:

https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/10.12002/j.bisu.323        https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V43/I1/110

[1] Barcelona A. Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy[C]//Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2011: 7-57.
[2] Blanco-Carrión O, Barcelona A & Pannain R. Conceptual Metonymy:Methodological,Theoretical,and Descriptive Issues[M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 2018.
[3] Dancygier B & Sweetser E. Mental Spaces in Grammar:Conditional Constructions[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[4] Lakoff G & Turner M. More than Cool Reason:A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
[5] Yu N. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor:A Perspective from Chinese[M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.
[1] 刘 银 杨文彬. 反腐倡廉公益平面广告中的多模态隐喻和转喻[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2017, 39(6): 40-56.