[1] |
Bernasconi R & Wood D. The Provocation of Levinas:Rethinking the Other[M]. London:Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2003.
|
[2] |
Berning N. Toward a critical ethical narratology for literary reportages:Analysing the story ethics of Alexandra Fuller’s Scribbling the Cat[J]. Literaire Interferenties, 2011(7):189~221.
|
[3] |
Cormack A. Postmodernism and the ethics of fiction in Atonement[C]// Sebastian G. Ian McEwan:Contemporary Critical Perspectives. London:Continuum, 2009: 70~82.
|
[4] |
Finney B. Briony’s stand against oblivion:The making of fiction in Ian McEwan’s Atonement[J]. Journal of Modern Literature, 2004,27(3):68~82.
DOI
URL
|
[5] |
Head D. Contemporary British Novelists:Ian McEwan[M]. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007.
|
[6] |
Levinas E. Totality and Infinity:An Essay on Exteriority[M]. Lingis A(Trans.). The Hague:M. Nijhoff Publishers, 1979.
|
[7] |
Lynn D. A conversation with Ian McEwan[J]. The Kenyon Review, 2007,29(3):38~51.
|
[8] |
McEwan I. Only Love and Then Oblivion. Love Was All They Had to Set Against Their Murderers[EB/OL]. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/15/september11.politicsphilosophyandsociety2, 2001-09-15/2017-12-28.
|
[9] |
Müller W G. An ethical Narratology[C]// Astrid E,Herbert G & Ansgar N. Ethics in Culture:The Dissemination of Values through Literature and Other Media. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter, 2008: 117~130.
|
[10] |
Nicklas P. Ian McEwan:Art and Politics[M]. Heidelberg:Universitätsverlag Winter, 2009.
|
[11] |
O’Hara K D. Briony’s being-for:Metafictional narrative ethics in Ian McEwan’s Atonement[J]. Critique:Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 2011,52(1):74~100.
|
[12] |
Phelan J. Narrative judgments and the rhetorical theory of narrative:Ian McEwan’s Atonement[C]//Phelan J & Rabinowitz P J. A Companion to Narrative Theory. Oxford:Blackwell, 2005: 322~336.
|
[13] |
安斯加尔•纽宁, 汤轶丽. 叙事学与伦理批评:同床异梦,抑或携手联姻[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016,24(4):26~37.
|
[14] |
胡慧勇. 常论与悖论——小说《赎罪》中敦刻尔克奇迹的自我消解[J]. 海南大学学报(社会科学版), 2013,31(2):37~42.
|
[15] |
江守义. 伦理视野中的小说视角[J]. 外国文学研究, 2017,39(2):20~28.
|
[16] |
罗媛. 移情视阈下的伊恩•麦克尤恩小说研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2012.
|
[17] |
热拉尔•热奈特. 叙事话语新叙事话语[M]. 王文融,译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1990.
|
[18] |
尚必武. 新世纪的伊恩•麦克尤恩研究:现状与趋势[J]. 外国文学动态, 2013(1):4~7.
|
[19] |
尚必武. 从“两个转向”到“两种批评”——论叙事学和文学伦理学的兴起、发展与交叉愿景[J]. 学术论坛, 2017,40(2):7~12.
|
[20] |
申丹. 何为“不可靠叙述”?[J]. 外国文学评论, 2006(4):133~143.
|
[21] |
伍茂国. 现代性语境中第一人称叙事的伦理意义[J]. 中国文学研究, 2011(3):97~100.
|
[22] |
伍茂国. 在时间中成就德性——论作为叙事主题与形式的时间叙事伦理[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012(6):110~113.
|
[23] |
伊恩•麦克尤恩. 赎罪[M]. 郭国良,译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2008.
|
[24] |
詹姆斯•费伦, 玛丽•帕特里夏•玛汀. 威茅斯经验:同故事叙述、不可靠性、伦理与《人约黄昏时》[C]//戴卫•赫尔曼. 新叙事学. 马海良,译 . 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002: 35~57.
|
[25] |
赵毅衡. 当说者被说的时候:比较叙述学导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1998.
|