Please wait a minute...
北京第二外国语学院学报  2020, Vol. 42 Issue (2): 91-103    DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.277
外国文学研究     
狄更斯与纨绔精神:《我们共同的朋友》中的尤金形象辨析
陈辉()
北京大学英语系,100871
Dickens and Dandyism: Eugene Wrayburn in Our Mutual Friend
Chen Hui()
English Department, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
 全文: PDF(1232 KB)   HTML
摘要:

《我们共同的朋友》中尤金的纨绔子特质常遭到误解或漠视,本文通过揭示狄更斯与同时代的纨绔子布尔沃•利顿其人其文的历史联系,在小说文本分析的基础上,辨析尤金的纨绔子身份以及作者对这一人物倾注的同情。尤金在机敏悖谬的言辞、镇定自若的举止、懒散的生活方式、浅表化的人生态度等方面表现出了纨绔精神,纨绔精神在小说中具有积极内涵,与尤金的绅士设定相容,与文中的中产阶级文化批判主旨趋于一致。尤金不同于狄更斯以往描绘的纨绔子群像,展现了人物设定上的复杂性和内在统一性,反映了狄更斯与纨绔精神相容的一面。

关键词: 尤金狄更斯纨绔精神布尔沃•利顿中产阶级文化    
Abstract:

In Our Mutual Friend, Eugene’s identity as a dandy has frequently been misinterpreted or ignored. Through textual analysis and historical exploration of Dickens’s association with Bulwer Lytton in his social life and writing career, the paper discloses Dickens’s partial identification with aristocratic and dandyish culture, which probably accounts for the author’s positive treatment of Eugene as a dandyish gentleman. Eugene demonstrates a dandyish tendency in his witty remarks, calm manner, indolent way of living, and playful attitude toward life and middle class morality. With those dandyish characteristics, Eugene displays different ways of seeing and living, and his deviance from social norms is endowed with cultural significance in accordance with the overall attack on middle-class culture in the novel. Eugene is markedly different from the debauched dandies in Dickens’s prior works. To accept the character of Eugene as a dandy in a favorable light will help readers to discern the complexity of and consistency in the characterization. Dickens’s sympathetic attitude towards dandyism, though much ignored by critics, is displayed fully in this novel.

Key words: Eugene    Dickens    dandyism    Bulwer Lytton    middle-class culture
收稿日期: 2017-11-03 出版日期: 2020-08-14
PACS:  I106  
作者简介: 陈辉,北京大学英语系,100871,研究方向:英美文学。电子邮箱: jiudichongyou@pku.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
陈辉

引用本文:

陈辉. 狄更斯与纨绔精神:《我们共同的朋友》中的尤金形象辨析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(2): 91-103.

Chen Hui. Dickens and Dandyism: Eugene Wrayburn in Our Mutual Friend. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2020, 42(2): 91-103.

链接本文:

https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/10.12002/j.bisu.277        https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V42/I2/91

[1] Bloom H. Bloom’s Classic Critical Views: Charles Dickens[M]. New York: InfoBase, 2008.
[2] Bradbury N. Dickens and the form of the novel[C]// Jordan J O. The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 152~166.
[3] Carlyle T. Sartor Resartus[M]. New York: Macmillan, 1927.
[4] Cheadle B. The late novels:Great Expectations and Our Mutual Friend[C]// Jordan J O. The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 78~91.
[5] Coste M A. Eugene Wrayburn,or the unbearable lightness of being in Dickens[J]. The Dickensian 2009,105(2):109~121.
[6] Cotsell M. The Companion to Our Mutual Friend[M]. London: Allen & Unwin, 1986.
[7] Dickens C. Our Mutual Friend[M]. London: Dent, 1963.
[8] Goldberg M. Carlyle and Dickens[M]. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1972.
[9] Hartley J. The Selected Letters of Charles Dickens[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[10] Hayward A L. The Days of Dickens: A Glance at Some Aspects of Early Victorian Life in London[M]. New York: Routledge, 2013.
[11] Houghton W E. The Victorian Frame of Mind,1830—1870[M]. London: Yale University Press, 1963.
[12] Lytton E B. The Dramatic Works of Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton Vol 2[M]. Leipzig:Bernhard Tauchnitz, 1860.
[13] Lytton E B. England and the English[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
[14] McMaster R D. Dickens,the dandy,and the savage:A Victorian view of the Romantic[J]. Studies in the Novel 1969,1(2):133~146.
[15] Newey V. Rival cultures:Charles Dickens and the Byronic legacy[C]// Radford A & Sandy M. Romantic Echoes in the Victorian Era. Hampshire:Ashgate, 2008: 67~83.
[16] Orwell G. Dickens’s radicalism,plausibility,and his image of the working man[C]// Bloom H. Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: Charles Dickens. New York:InfoBase, 2006: 39~57.
[17] Pine R. The Dandy and the Herald[M]. London: Macmillan, 1988.
[18] Sadleir M. Bulwer: A Panorama[M]. London: Constable, 1931.
[19] Schaffer T. Fashioning aestheticism by aestheticizing fashion:Wilde,Beerbohm,and the male aesthetes’ sartorial codes[J]. Victorian Literature and Culture 2000,28(1):39~54.
doi: 10.1017/S1060150300281035
[20] Slater M. Charles Dickens[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.
[21] Smith T S. Aestheticism and social structure:Style and social network in the dandy life[J]. American Sociological Review 1974,39(5):725~743.
doi: 10.2307/2094317
[22] Stone D D. The Romantic Impulse in Victorian Fiction[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.
[23] Storey G & Tillotson K. The Letters of Charles Dickens[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[24] Thrall M M. Two articles attributed to Carlyle[J]. Modern Language Notes 1931,46(5):316~321.
doi: 10.2307/2913677
[25] Wilson A. The heroes and heroines of Dickens[C]//Bloom H. Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: Charles Dickens. New York:InfoBase, 2006: 83~90.
[26] 查尔斯•狄更斯. 艰难时世[M]. 全增嘏,胡文淑译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 1978.
[27] 弗吉尼亚•伍尔夫. 普通读者[M]. 上海: 上海世界图书出版公司, 2010.
[28] 胡永华. 奥斯卡•王尔德——时尚先生与唯美生活的哲学家[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2011(10):39~45.
[29] 马丁•威纳. 英国文化与工业精神的衰落[M]. 王章辉,吴必康 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2013.
[30] 约翰•斯梅尔. 中产阶级文化的起源[M]. 陈勇译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2006.
[31] 周小仪. 唯美主义与消费文化[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002.
[1] 王占斌. 割舍不了的信仰情结:尤金·奥尼尔的宗教伦理叙事[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(2): 100-111.
[2] 王占斌. 尤金·奥尼尔戏剧中蕴含的解构意识[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2015, 37(8): 28-.