Please wait a minute...
北京第二外国语学院学报  2017, Vol. 39 Issue (2): 102-116    DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.091
外国文学研究     
边界的消解,神话的破灭——动物研究视角下的《五号屠场》
李素杰
李素杰,北京第二外国语学院英语学院
Blurred Boundaries, Deflated Myth: An Interpretation of Slaughterhouse-Five from the Perspective of Animal Studies
LI Sujie
Beijing International Studies University, Beijing 100024, China
 全文: PDF(869 KB)   [HTML]()
摘要: 《五号屠场》是美国作家冯内古特的代表作,以其独特的叙事技巧和鲜明的反战主题而著称,然而小说中众多的动物意象却一直未引起关注。本文借助新兴的动物研究理论对这些动物意象进行深入挖掘,探寻它们背后的主题蕴含。笔者发现,这些动物承载着多重意义。作为隐喻符号,它们是展现人性的镜子,揭示了人在战争面前的尴尬无助,打破了“人乃万物之尊”的神话。它们同时又是鲜活的生命主体,代表着战争中动物的悲惨命运,反映了作家深沉博大的人道主义思想。此外,小说将动物、战俘、地球人在动物园和屠宰场被巧妙地平行并置、交叉错位,消解了人与动物之间的边界,是对西方文明中根深蒂固的人类中心主义和物种歧视主义的尖锐批判,因而使小说超越了反战小说的意义。
关键词: 《五号屠场》越界动物物种歧视主义人类中心主义    
Abstract: Slaughterhouse-Five is the masterpiece of American author Kurt Vonnegut and is well-known for its unique narrative techniques and strong anti-war theme. However, the rich animal images in the novel have long been ignored. In light of the newly rising animal studies, this article explores the meaning of the animal images in an effort to find out their significant meaning. We find that they serve several roles. Firstly, as metaphorical symbols, they function as mirrors, reflecting the human predicament of embarrassment and helplessness in face of war, and thus deflating the myth of “the paragon of animals”. Secondly, they are independent subjects of life and stand for their own sufferings in war, which reflects Vonnegut’s extended humanitarianism. Thirdly, by paralleling and displacing animals, prisoners of war, and earthlings in the slaughterhouse in Dresden and the Tralfamadore zoo, the novel blurs species boundaries and trespasses the “insuperable line” between humans and animals that has long been regarded sacred in the western culture. Thus, Slaughterhouse-Five transcends the genre of war novel and launches its critique at the entire western civilization, its anthropocentricism and speciesism in particular.
Key words: Slaughterhouse-Five    transgression    animals    speciesism    anthro-pocentricism
收稿日期: 2016-07-11 出版日期: 2018-03-19
PACS:  I106.4  
基金资助: 本文为北京市教育委员会社科计划一般项目阶段性成果(项目编号:SM201710031003)、“北京文化对外传播研究基地(文学方向)”阶段性成果。
作者简介: 李素杰,北京第二外国语学院英语学院,100024,研究领域:美国小说和生态批评。电子邮箱:19970001@bisu.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
李素杰

引用本文:

李素杰. 边界的消解,神话的破灭——动物研究视角下的《五号屠场》[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2017, 39(2): 102-116.

LI Sujie. Blurred Boundaries, Deflated Myth: An Interpretation of Slaughterhouse-Five from the Perspective of Animal Studies. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2017, 39(2): 102-116.

链接本文:

https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/10.12002/j.bisu.091        https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2017/V39/I2/102

[1]Adams C. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory [M]. New York & London: Continuum, 2010.
[2]Allen W R. Understanding Kurt Vonnegut [M]. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991.
[3]Baker S. Picturing the Beast [M]. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 1993.
[4]Bentham J. Principles of morals and legislation [A]. Kalof L & Fitzgerald A(Eds.). The Animals Reader: the Essential Classic and Contemporary Writings[C]. Oxford & New York: Berg, 2007:8~9.
[5]Berger J. About Looking [M]. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
[6]Deleuze G & Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia [M]. London: Athlone Press, 1988.
[7]Derrida J. The Animal That Therefore I Am [M].Wills D (Trans.). Mallet M-L(Ed.). New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.
[8]Derrida J. The Beast and the Sovereign(Vol. I) [M].  Bennington G (Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
[9]Fudge E. Perceiving Animals: Humans and Beasts in Early Modern English Culture [M]. London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 2000.
[10]Hochman J. The ‘Lamb’ in The Silence of the Lambs [A]. Coupe L (Ed.). Green Studies Reader[C]. London and New York: Routledge, 2000:299~301.
[11]Johnson V. Everyday rituals of the master race: Fascism, stratification, and the fluidity of ‘animal’ domination [A]. Sanbonmatsu J(Ed.). Critical Theory and Animal Liberation[C]. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011.
[12]Kete K. Animal and ideology: The politics of animal protection in Europe [A]. Rothfels N(Ed.). Representing Animals[C]. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2002.
[13]Malamud R. Poetic Animals and Animal Souls [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
[14]Malamud R. Reading Zoos: Representations of Animals and Captivity [M]. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
[15]Shields C J. And So It Goes: A Life of Kurt Vonnegut [M]. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2011.
[16]Singer P. Animal Liberation [M]. New York:Harper Collins Publishers,2002.
[17]Spiegel M. The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery [M]. New York: Mirror Books, 1988.
[18]Sztybel D. Can the treatment of animals be compared to the Holocaust? [J]. Ethics and the Environment, 2006(11): 97~132.
[19]Tuan Y-f. Dominance and Affection [M]. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1984.
[20]Vonnegut K. Palm Sunday: An Autobiographical Collage [M]. New York: Dell Publishing, 1981.
[21]Vonnegut K. Wampeters, Foma and Granfallons [M]. New York: Dell Publishing, 1976.
[22]Vonnegut K. Slaughterhouse-Five [M]. New York: Dell Publishing, 1991.
[23]Vonnegut K, Stringer L. Like Shaking Hands with God: a Conversation about Writing [M]. New York: Seven Stories Press, 1999.
[24]Vonnegut K. A Man Without A Country [M]. New York: Random House, 2007.
[25]布洛克.西方人文主义传统 [M] .董乐山译.北京:群言出版社,2012.
[26]冯内古特.五号屠场 [M].虞建华译.南京:译林出版社,2008.
[27]李素杰.当代文学批评中的动物研究 [J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2014(10):56~64.
[1] 王 泉. 《她的狗》中的动物话语[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2015, 37(12): 48-.
[2] 孔令学,吴平. 动物明星旅游价值开发问题探讨[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2014, 36(9): 38-.
[3] 杨建玫. 尊重动物生命:欧茨小说中的动物关怀情结[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2014, 36(2): 56-.
[4] 李素杰. 当代文学批评中的动物研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2014, 36(10): 56-.