[1]Anderson, N. J. Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing[J]. Modern Language Journal,1991,75 :460—470.
[2]Anderson, M. C. M. & K.W. Thiede. Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy[J]. Acta Psychologica,2008,128(1):110—118.
[3]Baker, J. M. C. & J. Dunlosky. Does momentary accessibility influence metacomprehension judgements? The influence of study—judgment lags on accessibility effects[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2006,13(1):60—65.
[4]Dunlosky, J. & K. A. Rawson. Why does rereading improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect [J]. Discourse Processes,2005,40(1):37—55.
[5]Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A. & E. L. Middleton. What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments :Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses[J]. Journal of Memory and Language,2005,52 :551—565.
[6]Dunlosky, J., Baker, J. M. C., Rawson, K. A. & C. Hertzog. Does aging influence people’s metacomprehension? Effects of processing ease on judgments of text learning[J]. Psychology and Aging,2006,21(2):390—400.
[7]Graham, S., Schwartz, S. & C. MacArthur. Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude towards writing, and self—efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities[J]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1993,26 :237—249.
[8]Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J. & K.W. Thiede. Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation : Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy[J]. Memory & Cognition, 2008,36(1):93—103.
[9]Koriat, A. & H. Ma’ayan. The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2005, 52(4): 478—492.
[10]Matlin, M. W. Cognition(6th ed.)[M]. New York : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2005.
[11]Nelson, T. O. & J. Dunlosky. When people’s judgments of learning(JOLs)are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall :The“ delayed-JOL effect.”[J]. Psychological Science,1991,2(4):267—270.
[12]Rawson, K. A & J. Dunlosky. Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing ? [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory & Cognition,2002,28(1):69—80.
[13]Thiede, K.W, Anderson, M. C. M & D. Therriault. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003,95(1):66—73.
[14]Thiede, K.W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D. & J. Wiley. Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2005,31(6):1267—1280.
[15]Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J. & M. C. M., Anderson. Poor metacomprehension accuracy as a result of inappropriate cue use[J]. Discourse Processes, 2010,47(4):331—362.
[16]Thomas, A. K. & M. A. McDaniel. Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials :Dramatic effects of encoding—retrieval interactions[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2007a,14(2):212—218.
[17]Thomas, A. K. & M. A. McDaniel. The negative cascade of incongruent generative study—test processing in memory and metacomprehension[J]. Memory & Cognition,2007b,35(4):668—678.
[18]Wiley, J., Griffin, T. & K. W. Thiede. Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension[J]. Journal of General Psychology,2005,132 :408—428.
[19]陈启山. 理解评估与成绩预测:两种不同的元理解监测形式[J]. 心理学报,2008,40(9):961—968.
[20]陈启山, 常蕤. 读者的元理解监测为什么不精确[J]. 心理科学进展,2009,17(4):706—713.
[21]陈启山. 元理解监测精确性的延迟效应及其机制 [J]. 心理科学,2011(4):828—833. |