Journal of Beijing International Studies University ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 74-87.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.442
• Linguistic Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2018-11-26
Online:
2023-05-11
Published:
2023-04-30
作者简介:
蔡晨,浙江树人学院基础学院,310015,研究方向:应用语言学、社会语言学。电子邮箱:greatshaka@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Cai Chen. The Effects of Text Coherence and Narrative Perspective on Learners’ Inference Performance in Foreign-language Reading[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2023, 45(2): 74-87.
蔡晨. 语篇连贯和人称叙事对外语学习者阅读推论表现的影响[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023, 45(2): 74-87.
语篇结构 | 语篇大意 |
---|---|
背景 | The story of how Elizabeth Barrett and Robert Browning met,fell in love and married is one of the most famous love stories in history. |
初始事件 | One day,Robert was reading some of Elizabeth’s poems. |
内在反应 | A friendship developed as they discovered their common interests and ideas. |
内在计划 | Elizabeth and Robert arranged to meet while Elizabeth’s father was not in the house. |
尝试 | They continued meeting and talking secretly once or twice a week for the next year. |
直接结果 | Elizabeth Barrett became Elizabeth Browning and the happy couple eloped to Italy. |
反应 | They lived in Italy,for 15 years,until Elizabeth’s death in 1861. |
语篇结构 | 语篇大意 |
---|---|
背景 | The story of how Elizabeth Barrett and Robert Browning met,fell in love and married is one of the most famous love stories in history. |
初始事件 | One day,Robert was reading some of Elizabeth’s poems. |
内在反应 | A friendship developed as they discovered their common interests and ideas. |
内在计划 | Elizabeth and Robert arranged to meet while Elizabeth’s father was not in the house. |
尝试 | They continued meeting and talking secretly once or twice a week for the next year. |
直接结果 | Elizabeth Barrett became Elizabeth Browning and the happy couple eloped to Italy. |
反应 | They lived in Italy,for 15 years,until Elizabeth’s death in 1861. |
统计量 | 整体 | 因果顺叙连贯 | 因果倒叙连贯 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
第一人称 | 第三人称 | 第一人称 | 第三人称 | ||
平均值 | 3.18 | 3.83 | 3.14 | 2.85 | 2.61 |
标准差 | 0.738 | 0.478 | 0.681 | 0.610 | 0.453 |
统计量 | 整体 | 因果顺叙连贯 | 因果倒叙连贯 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
第一人称 | 第三人称 | 第一人称 | 第三人称 | ||
平均值 | 3.18 | 3.83 | 3.14 | 2.85 | 2.61 |
标准差 | 0.738 | 0.478 | 0.681 | 0.610 | 0.453 |
语篇推理能力 | F(1,138) | Repeated Contrasts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | |||
因果顺叙(N=70) | 3.49 | 0.679 | 50.366* | 因果顺叙>因果倒叙 |
因果倒叙(N=70) | 2.73 | 0.585 | ||
第一人称(N=70) | 3.36 | 0.733 | 16.318* | 第一人称>第三人称 |
第三人称(N=70) | 2.88 | 0.667 |
语篇推理能力 | F(1,138) | Repeated Contrasts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | |||
因果顺叙(N=70) | 3.49 | 0.679 | 50.366* | 因果顺叙>因果倒叙 |
因果倒叙(N=70) | 2.73 | 0.585 | ||
第一人称(N=70) | 3.36 | 0.733 | 16.318* | 第一人称>第三人称 |
第三人称(N=70) | 2.88 | 0.667 |
[1] | BORREGGINE K L. Where Action Meets Linguistic Meaning:Embodied Experience and Sentence Comprehension[D]. Florida: The Florida State University, 2007. |
[2] | BOULINEAU T, FORE C, HAGAN-BURKE S, et al. Use of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities[J]. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2004(2):105-121. |
[3] | CHOU M C. The effects of causal relations on Chinese EFL learners’ inferential process[J]. Hwa Kang Journal of English Language & Literature, 2005(3):61-78. |
[4] | ELLEMAN A M. Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers:A meta-analytic review[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2017(6):761-781. |
[5] | GERNSBACHER M A. The structure building framework:What it is,what it might also be,and why[C]//BRITTON B K & GASESSER A C. Models of Text Understanding. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995:289-31l. |
[6] | GRAESSER A C, MILLIS K K & ZWAAN R. Discourse comprehension[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1997(1):163-189. |
[7] |
GRAESSER A C, SINGER M & TRABASSO T. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension[J]. Psychological Review, 1994(3):371-395.
PMID |
[8] |
HARTUNG F, BURKE M & HAGOORT P. Narrative perspective influences immersion in fiction reading:Evidence from skin conductance response[J]. Chest, 2014(1):32-38.
DOI PMID |
[9] | HOUSKA J A. The Influence of Perspective and Gender on the Processing of Narratives[D]. Reno: University of Nevada, 2010. |
[10] | KINTSCH W. Comprehension:A Paradigm for Cognition[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. |
[11] | LAYDER D. The relation of theory and method:Causal relatedness,historical contingency and beyond[J]. Sociological Review, 2015(3):441-463. |
[12] | LINDERHOLM T, EVERSON M G, VAN DEN BROEK P, et al. Effects of causal text revisions on more and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts[J]. Cognition and Instruction, 2000(4):525-556. |
[13] | LONG D L, OPPY B J & SEELY M R. Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory & Cognition, 1994(6):1456-1470. |
[14] |
MCKOON G & RATCLIFF R. Inference during reading[J]. Psychological Review, 1992(3):440-466.
DOI PMID |
[15] | MILLIS K K & GRAESSER A C. The time-course of constructing knowledge-based inferences for scientific texts[J]. Journal of Memory & Language, 1994(5):583-599. |
[16] | PHELAN J & RABINOWITZ P J. Introduction:Tradition and Innovation in Contemporary Narrative Theory[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2007. |
[17] | RITCHEY K A. How generalization inferences are constructed in expository text comprehension[J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2011(4):280-288. |
[18] | SAADATNIA M, KETABI S & TAVAKOLI M. Levels of reading comprehension across text types:A comparison of literal and inferential comprehension of expository and narrative texts in Iranian EFL learners[J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2017(5):1-13. |
[19] | SALEM S, WESKOTT T & HOLLER A. Does narrative perspective influence readers’ perspective taking? — An empirical study on free indirect discourse,psycho-narration and first-person narration[J]. Glossa:A Journal of General Linguistics, 2017(1):1-18. |
[20] | SINGER M. Discourse inference processes[C]//GERNSBACHER M A. Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, 1994:479-515. |
[21] | STALLER K M. The many ways of knowing Ann Hartman:Themes of power,subjugation and narration[J]. Qualitative Social Work, 2016(4):447-456. |
[22] | TRABASSO T, SECCO T & VAN DEN BROEK P. Causal cohesion and story coherence[C]//MANDL H,STEIN N L & TRABASSO T. Learning and Comprehension of Text. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1984:83-111. |
[23] | TRABASSO T & SPERRY L L. Causal relatedness and importance of story events[J]. Journal of Language and Memory, 1985(1):595-611. |
[24] | VAN DEN BROEK P, LYNCH J S, NASLUND J, et al. The development of comprehension of main ideas in narratives:Evidence from the selection of titles[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003(4):707-718. |
[25] | VIDAL-ABARCA E, MARTINEZ G & GILABERT R. Two procedures to improve instructional text:Effects on memory and learning[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000(1):107-116. |
[26] | ZHANG H & HOOSAIN R. The influence of narrative text characteristics on thematic inference during reading[J]. Journal of Research in Reading, 2010(2):173-186. |
[27] | ZWAAN R A, MAGLIANO J P & GRAESSER A C. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 1995(2):386-397. |
[28] | 范琳, 刘振前. 英语叙事语篇标题启动条件对中国学生即时主题推理影响的研究[J]. 外语学刊, 2008(4):128-131. |
[29] | 范琳, 刘振前. 英语叙事语篇因果连贯对中国学生实时主题推理影响的研究[J]. 外语研究, 2009(1):51-56. |
[30] | 高婷婷. 工作记忆与故事结构对高中生即时因果推理的影响[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2013. |
[31] | 黄希云. 小说人称的叙述功能[J]. 外国文学评论, 1996(4):12-17. |
[32] | 连启舜, 张思洁. 文章连贯性和人称叙写观点对儿童道德故事主题理解的影响[J]. 教育心理学报, 2016(3):391-415. |
[33] | 刘学华. 因果关系和时间表征对情境模型加工的影响[D]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2007. |
[34] | 王爱军. 叙事客观化:论中国现代散文体小说的叙述修辞[J]. 聊城大学学报, 2014(3):43-49. |
[35] | 伍丽梅, 莫雷. 说明文阅读中整体连贯因果推理的产生[J]. 华南师范大学学报, 2012(3):40-49. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||