Cai Jigang, Lin Yun. A New Challenge to Academic Writing: Generating a Thesis with ChatGPT[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2024, 46(4): 29-42.
1. A Contrastive Analysis of Rhetorical Patterns in Research Articles by Chinese and English Native Scholars. 2. The Role of Cultural and Linguistic Factors in Shaping Research Article Writing Styles: A Comparative Study of Chinese and English Native Scholars. 3. Citation Practices in Research Articles: A Comparative Analysis between Chinese and English Native Scholars. 4. Investigating Disciplinary Variation in Research Articles: A Cross-Cultural Comparison between Chinese and English Native Scholars. 5. The Impact of Language Proficiency on the Clarity and Coherence of Research Articles: A Comparative Study of Chinese and English Native Scholars.
Outline Abstract: I. Introduction A. Background and significance of the study B. Purpose of the research C. The objective D. The structure of the paper II. Literature Review A. Citation practices in academic writing B. Cross-cultural studies on citation practices C. The impact of cultural and linguistic factors on citation practices III. Methodology A. Research design B. Data collection (Selection of research articles; Criteria for selecting articles) C. Data analysis (Quantitative analysis of citation frequency; Qualitative analysis of citation purposes and styles) IV. Results A. Comparison of citation frequency B. Comparison of citation purposes C. Comparison of citation styles V. Discussion A. Interpretation of results B. Cultural, academic, and linguistic factors influencing citation practices C. Implications for academic writing instruction VI. Conclusion A. Summary of findings B. Limitations of the study C. Suggestions for future research References
I. Introduction … The purpose of this research is to conduct a comparative analysis of citation practices in research articles authored by Chinese and English native scholars within the field of social sciences. There are four research questions: i) Are there significant differences in the frequency and distribution of citations between research articles written by Chinese and English native scholars? ii) How do the citation purposes differ in research articles written by Chinese and English native scholars? iii) Are there any variations in citation styles used by Chinese and English native scholars in their research articles? iv) Are there any differences in the citation methods used by Chinese and English native scholars in their research articles?
II. Literature Review … In summary, the literature on citation practices in academic writing has investigated various aspects, including cross-cultural studies and the impact of cultural and linguistic factors on citation practices. However, research specifically comparing Chinese and English native scholars is limited. This study, therefore, aims to address the identified gaps in the literature by examining the differences in citation frequency, purposes, styles, and methods between Chinese and English native scholars, as well as the role of cultural and linguistic factors in shaping these practices.
III. Methodology … To address the research questions, two corpora will be created: one comprising research articles authored by Chinese scholars (CSC) and another comprising research articles authored by English native scholars (ESC). The corpora will be balanced in terms of the number of articles, disciplines, and publication years. A total of 100 research articles will be selected: 50 from the CSC and 50 from the ESC. The articles will be drawn from reputable academic journals in the field of social sciences, published within the last five years. The selection criteria include the following: i) articles must be empirical research articles, not literature reviews or opinion pieces. ii) they must be authored by either Chinese scholars (for CSC) or English native scholars (for ESC), as determined by the authors’ affiliations and biographical information. iii) articles must be written in English, as it is the lingua franca of international scholarly communication. The coding will be carried out by two independent coders to ensure reliability. The coded data will then be analyzed to identify patterns and differences between the CSC and ESC in terms of citation purposes, methods, and styles. …
IV. Results The analysis of citation frequency and distribution in the research articles revealed some interesting patterns. Figure 1 shows the average citation density for the Chinese Scholar Corpus (CSC) and the English Scholar Corpus (ESC). The results indicate that the ESC had a higher citation density (M=9.54, SD=2.10) than the CSC (M=7.82, SD=1.95), t(98)=4.16, p<.001. This suggests that English native scholars tend to use more citations in their research articles than Chinese scholars. [Insert Figure 1 here: Bar graph depicting the average citation density for the CSC and ESC]
HUANG K. Alarmed by AI Chatbots, Universities Start Revamping How They Teach[EB/OL].(2023-01-21)[2024-04-03]. https://www.ekathimerini.com/nytimes/1202708/alarmed-by-ai-chatbots-universities-start-revamping-how-they-teach/.
[2]
HYLAND K. Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge[J]. Applied Linguistics, 1999(3):341-367.
[3]
HYLAND K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing[M]. New York: Continuum, 2005.
[4]
LIU N, ZHANG Tianyi & LIANG P. Evaluating verifiability in generative search engines[C]//BOUAMOR H,PINO J & BALI K. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. Singapore:ACL,2023: 7001-7025.
[5]
MCCORMACK J & SLAGHT J. Extended Writing and Research Skills[M]. Reading: Garnet Publishing Ltd. Press, 2012.
[6]
RUSSEL GROUP. New Principles on Use of AI in Education[EB/OL].(2023-07-04)[2024-04-03]. https://russellgroup.ac.uk/news/new-principles-on-use-of-ai-in-education.
[7]
SWALES J M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1990.