Journal of Beijing International Studies University ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 78-94.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.511
• Academic Frontiers and Trends • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jiang Wei1(), Qin Lili2(), Du Shiqin1()
Online:
2024-06-06
Published:
2024-04-30
作者简介:
姜伟,大连外国语大学英语学院,116044,研究方向:外语教学。电子邮箱:809503624@qq.com基金资助:
CLC Number:
Jiang Wei, Qin Lili, Du Shiqin. Q Methodological Research in Applied Linguistics: A Systematic Review Based on PRISMA[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2024, 46(2): 78-94.
姜伟, 秦丽莉, 杜仕琴. 应用语言学Q方法研究述评:基于PRISMA系统性综述方法[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(2): 78-94.
[1] | AL MURSHIDI G. English as a foreign language learning students’ perceptions of blended learning in university institutions:A case study of a university in UAE[J]. Advances in Science,Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 2020(5):893-901. |
[2] | ALKHATEEB H, AL HAMAD M & MUSTAFAWI E. Revealing stakeholders’ perspectives on educational language policy in higher education through Q-methodology[J]. Current Issues in Language Planning, 2020(4):415-433. |
[3] | CAMENZULI R, LUNDBERG A & GAUCI P. Collective teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism in Maltese primary education[J]. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2023(4):379-394. |
[4] | CARUSO M & FRASCHINI N. A Q methodology study into vision of Italian L2 university students:An Australian perspective[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2021(2):552-568. |
[5] | COLLINS L & ANGELOVA M. What helps TESOL methods students learn:Using Q methodology to investigate students’ views of a graduate TESOL methods class[J]. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2015(2):247-260. |
[6] | CRESWELL J W & PLANO CLARK V L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research[M]. 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage, 2018. |
[7] | DAMIO S M & HASHIM H. Conceptions of autonomy in language learning from a cultural perspectives using Q methodology[J]. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 2014(1):33-45. |
[8] | DEIGNAN T & MORTON T. The challenges of English medium instruction for subject lecturers:A shared viewpoint[J]. ELT Journal, 2022(2):208-217. |
[9] | FRASCHINI N. ‘Because Korean is cool’ Adolescent learners’ vision,motivation,and the study of the Korean language[J]. Journal of Korean Language Education, 2020,31:37-74. |
[10] | FRASCHINI N. Language learners’ emotional dynamics:Insights from a Q methodology intensive single-case study[J]. Language,Culture and Curriculum, 2023(2):222-239. |
[11] | FRASCHINI N & PARK H. Anxiety in language teachers:Exploring the variety of perceptions with Q methodology[J]. Foreign Language Annals, 2021(2):341-364. |
[12] | FRASCHINI N & PARK H. A Q methodology study to explore Korean as a second language undergraduate student-teachers’ anxiety[J/OL]. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2022,3:100132[2022-12-08]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100132. |
[13] | GYENES A. Student perceptions of critical thinking in EMI programs at Japanese universities:A Q-methodology study[J/OL]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2021,54:101053[2022-09-18]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101053. |
[14] | IRIE K. Q methodology for post-social-turn research in SLA[J]. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2014(1):13-32. |
[15] | IRIE K & RYAN S. Study abroad and the dynamics of change in learner L2 self-concept[C]//DÖRNYEI Z,MACLNTYRE P D & HENRY A. Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2015:343-366. |
[16] | IRIE K, RYAN S & MERCER S. Using Q methodology to investigate pre-service EFL teachers’ mindsets about teaching competences[J]. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2018(3):575-598. |
[17] | JODAEI H, ZAREIAN G, AMIRIAN S M R, et al. The interplay of teacher motivation and learner motivation:A Q method study[J]. Current Psychology, 2021, 40:1696-1710. |
[18] | KENTZER N, BRACEY P & DEVECCHI C. Using activity theory and Q methodology to examine the experiences of in-service trainee teachers in the English further education sector[J]. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 2019(4):439-461. |
[19] | KERPELMAN J L. Using Q methodology to study possible selves[C]//DUNKEL C & KERPELMAN J. Possible Selves:Theory,Research and Applications. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2006:163-186. |
[20] | KRUK M, PAWLAK M, SHIRVAN M E, et al. Potential sources of foreign language learning boredom:A Q methodology study[J]. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2022(1):37-58. |
[21] | LI Xiaodong. The significance of Q-methodology as an innovative method for the investigation of affective variables in second language acquisition[J/OL]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022,13:995660[2022-12-08]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.995660. |
[22] | LU Juexuan, WANG Yajun, SHEN Qi, et al. Investment in learning Chinese by international students studying Chinese as a Second Language (CSL)[J/OL]. Sustainability, 2022(23):15664[2022-12-23]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315664. |
[23] | LU Xiuchuan & GENG Zhi. Faith or path? Profiling the motivations of multilingual Chinese as a foreign language teachers using Q methodology[J/OL]. Language Teaching Research, 2022[2022-09-16]. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221099079. |
[24] | LU Xiuchuan, ZHENG Yongyan & REN Wei. Motivation for learning Spanish as a foreign language:The case of Chinese L1 speakers at university level[J]. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 2019, 79:79-98. |
[25] | LU Xiuchuan, ZOU Xiao & TAO Jian. Spanish language teachers’pedagogical beliefs in Chinese universities[J]. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 2020, 84:41-53. |
[26] | LUNDBERG A. Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism:Findings from Q method research[J]. Current Issues in Language Planning, 2019a(3):266-283. |
[27] | LUNDBERG A. Teachers’ viewpoints about an educational reform concerning multilingualism in German-speaking Switzerland[J/OL]. Learning and Instruction, 2019b, 64:101244[2023-02-14]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101244. |
[28] | LUNDBERG A, DE LEEUW R & ALIANI R. Using Q methodology:Sorting out subjectivity in educational research[J/OL]. Educational Research Review, 2020, 31:100361[2022-08-02]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100361. |
[29] | MOHER D, LIBERATI A, TETZLAFF J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:The PRISMA statement[J/OL]. PLoS Medicine, 2009(7):e1000097[2023-02-14]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. |
[30] | MOHR S. Language choices among South African migrants in the tourist space of Zanzibar[J]. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 2020(1):60-72. |
[31] | MOREA N. Investigating change in subjectivity:The analysis of Q-sorts in longitudinal research[J/OL]. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2022(3):100025[2022-07-22]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100025. |
[32] | PEMBERTON R & COOKER L. Self-directed learning:Concepts,practice,and a novel research methodology[C]//MERCER S,RYAN S & WILLIAMS M. Psychology for Language Learning:Insights from Research,Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012:203-219. |
[33] | PENG Jian-E & WU Liyi. Motivational profiles of Chinese university students majoring in Spanish:A comparative study[J/OL]. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2022[2022-09-16]. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2035740. |
[34] | QIN Lili, YAO Lan & JIN Yinxing. Unpacking the interaction between foreign language learners’ emotion,cognition,and activity in the flipped classroom in higher education:A perezhivanie perspective[J/OL]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13:1005237 [2022-10-20]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005237. |
[35] | ROCK J. Exploring vocabulary-related epistemological beliefs with Q-methodology[J]. L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria, 2013(2):137-154. |
[36] | SAKAMOTO F. Global competence in Japan:What do students really need?[J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2022, 91:216-228. |
[37] | SUNG P & AKHTAR N. Exploring preschool teachers’ perspectives on linguistic diversity:A Q study[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, 65:157-170. |
[38] | THUMVICHIT A. Unfolding the subjectivity of foreign language enjoyment in online classes:A Q methodology study[J/OL]. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2022a[2022-09-16]. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2050917. |
[39] | THUMVICHIT A. Illuminating insights into subjectivity:Q as a methodology in applied linguistics research[J/OL]. Applied Linguistics Review, 2022b[2022-09-16]. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0205. |
[40] | THUMVICHIT A. Enjoyment in language teaching:A study into EFL teachers’ subjectivities[J/OL]. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 2022c[2022-11-21]. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0087. |
[41] | WANG Yanyan, NIKITINA L, KAUR J, et al. Developing and piloting a Q-sample on Chinese language learners’ epistemic beliefs[J]. Journal of Language and Education, 2022(3):119-132. |
[42] | WATTS S & STENNER P. Doing Q Methodological Research:Theory,Method and Interpretation[M]. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage, 2012. |
[43] | WU Peng & WANG Yanyan. Investigating business English teachers’ belief about online assessment:Q methodology conducted during COVID-19 period[J]. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2021(6):621-630. |
[44] | WU Xinran & FORBES K. Multilingual identity in schools:A Q methodological study with Chinese LOTE-as-L3 learners in international and public high school contexts[J/OL]. Journal of Language,Identity & Education, 2022[2022-11-21]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2134138. |
[45] | YUAN Chengwen & LO BIANCO J. L2 Chinese teachers’ beliefs about engagement strategies for students in Australia:Findings from Q methodology research[J/OL]. System, 2022, 106:102792[2022-09-16]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102792. |
[46] | ZHENG Yongyan, LU Xiuchuan & REN Wei. Profiling Chinese university students’ motivation to learn multiple languages[J]. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2019(7):590-604. |
[47] | ZHENG Yongyan, LU Xiuchuan & REN Wei. Tracking the evolution of Chinese learners’ multilingual motivation through a longitudinal Q methodology[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2020(4):781-803. |
[48] | 陈建俞, 杨晓秋. 优秀青年科学基金项目绩效评价指标体系构建——基于德尔菲法和层次分析法[J]. 中国科学基金, 2023(3):496-503. |
[49] | 景飞龙. 基于Q方法的大学生外语移动学习参与度研究[J]. 外语界, 2020(1):79-87. |
[50] | 鹿秀川, 郑咏滟. 中国大学生英西双语动机探索研究[J]. 复旦外国语言文学论丛, 2019(1):28-36. |
[51] | 秦丽莉, 姜伟, 王永亮. 基于生态给养理论的外语教材评估框架构建——以课程思政元素的多模态内容为例[J]. 外语界, 2023(6):23-31. |
[52] | 秦丽莉, 欧阳西贝, 何艳华. 信息技术环境下语言教学/学习活动系统的“生态给养”转化有效性研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2021(2):251-262. |
[53] | 秦丽莉, 姚澜, 牛宝贵. 第二语言学习者情感研究述评[J]. 外语教育研究前沿, 2022a(2):51-58,92-93. |
[54] | 秦丽莉, 姚澜, 牛宝贵, 等. 社会文化理论框架下Perezhivanie的概念内涵与研究综述[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022b(1):11-24. |
[55] | 秦丽莉, 赵迎旭, 高洋, 等. 社会文化理论指导的大学英语课程思政教学有效性研究路径[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2023(1):78-86,161. |
[56] | 徐锦芬. 应用语言学研究的国际动态与前沿分析[J]. 现代外语, 2021(4):448-455. |
[57] | 姚孝军. 优秀英语学习者英语学习经验调查:基于Q法的文本分析[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2009(1):50-55. |
[58] | 张红, 杜欣然. 大学生英语学习动机类型及其影响[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021(6):105-118,131. |
[59] | 郑咏滟. 超学科范式下应用语言学Q方法的创新与前瞻[J]. 外国语, 2023(1):2-10. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||