Status Quo and Prospects of Language Education Management Research

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.496

Journal of Beijing International Studies University ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 29-44.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.496

• Linguistic Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles

Status Quo and Prospects of Language Education Management Research

Wang Lifei¹(), Teng Yanjiang²(), Shao Shanshan³()

1. Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China
3. Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2023-09-19 Online:2024-02-29 Published:2024-02-28

语言教育管理研究：现状与展望

王立非¹(), 滕延江²(), 邵珊珊³()

1.北京语言大学高级翻译学院/国际语言服务研究院，100083
2.鲁东大学外语学院，264025
3.中央财经大学外国语学院，102206

作者简介:王立非，博士，北京语言大学高级翻译学院/国际语言服务研究院教授，博士生导师，100083，研究方向：应用语言学、商务英语、语言服务。电子邮箱：philipw@126.com
滕延江，博士，鲁东大学外语学院，264025，研究方向：语言教育、语言服务。电子邮箱：tengyanjiang@126.com
邵珊珊，中央财经大学外国语学院，102206，研究方向：语言教育、商务英语、语言服务。电子邮箱：shaoshanshan@126.com
基金资助:
国家语言文字工作委员会“十三五”科研规划2020年度重大项目“新时代中国特色语言管理理论建构研究”（项目编号：ZDA135-16）子课题“新时代语言教育管理体系构建”

Abstract

Abstract:

Language education management refers to management behavior in which the country, society, individuals, and other entities coordinate the allocation of language resources, solve language problems, achieve language education goals, and meet national strategies and individual development needs. China’s language education management is currently based on the Chinese context with a global vision. The system is composed of the national language, foreign languages, minority languages, and Chinese as an international language and is aimed at contributing to the goal of common prosperity, the realization of national harmony and unity, and the construction of a global community with a shared future for mankind. Accordingly, this paper analyzes the characteristics of language education management, reviews the status quo of language education management in China and internationally, and proposes a focus on the studies of the following areas within language education management: environment, technology, talents, and evaluation. The implications for building a language education management system with Chinese characteristics are also explored.

Keywords: language education management; language management; language strategies; status quo and prospects

摘要：

语言教育管理是各级语言管理主体统筹语言资源配置、协调解决语言问题、实现语言教育目标、满足国家战略及个体发展需求的管理行为。在新时代，我国的语言教育管理立足中国、放眼世界，构建起了国家通用语、外语、民族语言、国际中文及“一带一路”语言协同发展、富有中国特色的语言战略格局，在服务国家战略、促进共同富裕、实现民族和谐团结、助力人类命运共同体建设等方面发挥了重要作用。本文从语言教育管理的内涵出发，归纳语言教育管理的特征，剖析国内外语言教育管理研究的发展现状，并提出今后应重点关注语言教育管理环境、语言教育技术管理、语言教育管理人才以及语言教育管理评价等4个层面的内容，以期为构建具有中国特色的语言教育管理体系提供参考。

关键词: 语言教育管理, 语言管理, 语言战略, 研究现状与展望

CLC Number:

H002

Wang Lifei, Teng Yanjiang, Shao Shanshan. Status Quo and Prospects of Language Education Management Research[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2024, 46(1): 29-44.

王立非, 滕延江, 邵珊珊. 语言教育管理研究：现状与展望[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(1): 29-44.

References 41

[1]	BOUCHARD J & GLASGOW G P. Agency in language policy and planning:A theoretical model[C]//BOUCHARD J & GLASGOW G P. Agency in Language Policy and Planning:Critical Inquiries. New York: Routledge, 2018:22-76.
[2]	CHEN Y L. A mixed-method study of EFL teachers’ internet use in language instruction[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2008(4):1015-1028.
[3]	COOPER R L. Language Planning and Social Change[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1989.
[4]	DALTON-PUFFER C. Content-and-language integrated learning:From practice to principles?[J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2011, 31:182-204.
[5]	GENESEE F, LINDHOLM-LEARY K, SAUNDERS W, et al. English language learners in U.S. schools:An overview of research findings[J]. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk(JESPAR), 2005(4):363-385.
[6]	HAMID M O & NGUYEN H T M. Globalization,English language policy,and teacher agency:Focus on Asia[J]. International Education Journal:Comparative Perspectives, 2016(1):26-44.
[7]	HENDERSON K I. Teacher language ideologies mediating classroom-level language policy in the implementation of dual language bilingual education[J]. Linguistics and Education, 2017, 42:21-33.
[8]	ISABELLI-GARCÍA C, BOWN J, PLEWS J L, et al. Language learning and study abroad[J]. Language Teaching, 2018(4):439-484.
[9]	JOHNSON D C. Positioning the language policy arbiter:Governmentality and footing in the school district of Philadelphia[C]//TOLLEFSON J W. Language Policies in Education:Critical Issues. 2^nd Ed. New York: Routledge, 2013:116-135.
[10]	MCCARTY T L. Ethnography and Language Policy[M]. New York: Routledge, 2011.
[11]	NEKVAPIL J & SHERMAN T. An introduction:Language management theory in language policy and planning[J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2015, 232:1-12.
[12]	PENDAKUR K & PENDAKUR R. Language as both human capital and ethnicity[J]. International Migration Review, 2002(1):147-177.
[13]	PETERSON G. The Power of Words:Literacy and Revolution in South China,1945-1995Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press,1997.
[14]	RUÍZ R. Orientations in language planning[J]. NABE Journal, 1984(2):15-34.
[15]	SPOLSKY B. Language Management[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[16]	SPOLSKY B. Family language policy — The critical domain[J]. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2012(1):3-11.
[17]	WEINSTEIN B. The Civic Tongue:Political Consequences of Language Choices[M]. New York: Longman,1983.
[18]	ZACHARIAS N T. Qualitative Research Methods for Second Language Education:A Coursebook[M]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012.
[19]	ZWIERS J. Building Academic Language:Meeting Common Core Standards across Disciplines[M]. 2^nd Ed. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
[20]	范琳, 孙莉, 王震. 老年人语篇阅读推理认知老化研究:回顾与展望[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021(3):116-133.
[21]	教育部. 关于政协第十三届全国委员会第四次会议第2624号(教育类091号)提案答复的函[EB/OL].(2021-10-15)[2022-12-27]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/xxgk_jyta/yuhe/202111/t20211104_577702.html.
[22]	李建民, 肖甦. 日本教育政策评价机制评析[J]. 现代教育管理, 2015(7):26-30.
[23]	李宇明. 中国语言资源的理念与实践[J]. 语言战略研究, 2019(3):16-28.
[24]	刘美兰. 美国关键语言战略研究[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2016.
[25]	刘彦林. 我国教育政策评价研究现状分析[J]. 教育评论, 2021(2):58-65.
[26]	马嫣, 赵蓉晖. 英国语言战略制度化浅论[J]. 语言战略研究, 2020(3):80-88.
[27]	滕延江. 论老年语言福利体系的构建[J]. 语言战略研究, 2022(3):78-87.
[28]	滕延江, 王立非. 中国语言规划管理生态体系的融合构建[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022(3):35-43.
[29]	王海峰. 国际中文教育的国际化与本土化[J]. 汉字文化, 2021(9):1-6.
[30]	王立非, 崔璨. “一带一路”对外贸易中的语言服务便利度测量实证研究[J]. 语言文字应用, 2020(3):26-35.
[31]	王立非, 任杰. 跨国语言管理的国外研究现状分析(1979-2019)[J]. 语言文字应用, 2021(2):16-27.
[32]	王鹏. 我国普通话普及率达80.72%[EB/OL]. (2021-06-02)[2022-12-27]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-06/02/content_5614991.htm.
[33]	王蔚起. 我国成人高等教育政策的价值分析[J]. 职教论坛, 2009(13):28-31.
[34]	魏晖. 新时代的语言教育管理[J]. 语言文字应用, 2019(1):2-10.
[35]	文秋芳. 构建“产出导向法”理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015(4):547-558,640.
[36]	温晓虹. 美国中文教学面临的挑战与对应策略[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2011(4):538-552.
[37]	银晴, 田静, 苏新春. 语言何以助力乡村振兴[J]. 语言战略研究, 2022(1):25-35.
[38]	张天伟, 陈练文. 国际组织语言政策与国家语言能力建设[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(2):68-76.
[39]	张蔚磊, 邹斌. 区域国别外语人才培养:为什么?怎么做?[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2023(3):18-25,77.
[40]	张智义, 倪传斌. 全国两会语言类提案分析(2020—2022年)[J]. 中国语言战略, 2022(1):98-107.
[41]	中共中央, 国务院. 中共中央国务院印发《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》[EB/OL]. (2020-10-13)[2022-12-27]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202010/t20201013_494381.html.

Status Quo and Prospects of Language Education Management Research

语言教育管理研究：现状与展望

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 41

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Teng Yanjiang, Wang Lifei. The Diachronic Evolution of Language Management Ideology in China [J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2024, 46(1): 45-61.
[2]	Wang Lifei, Li Jiexin. Actively Assisting in the High-Quality Development and Speed up of the Construction of the “New Liberal Arts Linguistics” with Chinese Characteristics [J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2022, 44(1): 3-10.