Subjectivity Differences in Discourse Markers Containing Speech and Subjectivity Gradations

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.302

Abstract

Abstract:

Research on discourse markers originated in the West, and soon became a hot topic in linguistic research after it was introduced into China. Discourse markers containing speech verbs refer to discourse markers containing the verb “shuo”（说）, which means more than just “speech”; it can also include cognition and comment. This paper places discourse markers containing speech verbs into one category, and examines their different degrees of subjectivity. The path of semantic change for “shuo” is speech-cognition-commentary. The subjectivity of discourse markers containing speech verbs is closely related to the senses of “shuo”; the subjectivity entailed in expressing different meanings is different, and forms a pattern in terms of degrees of subjectivity: evidentiality<cognition<commentary. From the left to the right, subjectivity becomes increasingly stronger, and the focus of inter-subjectivity moves from the speaker to the audience.

Keywords: speech; discourse markers; subjectivity; gradation

摘要：

话语标记研究兴起于西方,传入我国后很快成为语言学研究的热点。“言说话语标记”指含有言说动词“说”的话语标记,“说”不仅表示“言说义”,还可以表示认知与评述。本文将言说话语标记作为一类,对这类话语标记的主观性及其序列等级进行研究。“说”的意义演变可以概括为：言说义—认知义—评述义。按照语义演变规律,言说话语标记的主观性与言说话语标记中“说”的语义密切相关,并表达不同的意义,其主观性具有差异性,形成了主观性等级序列,即传信<认知<评述,主观性逐级增强,交互主观性从言者积聚于听者,序列右端的主观性最强。

关键词: 言说, 话语标记, 主观性, 等级

CLC Number:

H136

Pan Xianjun. Subjectivity Differences in Discourse Markers Containing Speech and Subjectivity Gradations[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2020, 42(5): 71-82.

潘先军. 言说话语标记的主观性差异及等级[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(5): 71-82.

References 31

[1]	Blakemore D. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning:The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[2]	Finegan E. Subjectivity and subjectivisation:Linguistic perspectives[C]//Stein D & Wright S. Subjectivity and Subjectivisation:An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 1~ 15.
[3]	Fraser B. What are discourse markers?[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1999,31(7):931~ 952.
[4]	Heritage J. Oh-prefaced responses to assessments:A method of modifying agreement/disagreement[M]// Ford C E,Fox B A & Thompson S A. The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 196~ 224.
[5]	Kuno S. Functional Syntax:Anaphora,Discourse and Empathy[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
[6]	Schiffrin D. Discourse Markers[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[7]	Stein D & Wright S. Subjectivity and Subjectivisation:Linguistic Perspectives[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[8]	曹秀玲. 汉语话语标记多视角研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2016.
[9]	董秀芳. “X说”的词汇化[J]. 语言科学, 2003,2(2):46~ 57.
[10]	董秀芳. 词汇化与话语标记的形成[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2007(1):50~ 61.
[11]	董秀芳. 来源于完整小句的话语标记“我告诉你”[J]. 语言科学, 2010,9(3):279~ 286.
[12]	侯瑞芬. “别说”与“别提”[J]. 中国语文, 2009(2):131~ 140.
[13]	李先银. 现代汉语话语否定标记研究[M]. 北京: 世界图书出版有限公司北京分公司, 2017.
[14]	李治平. 现代汉语言说词语话语标记研究[M]. 广州: 世界图书出版广东有限公司, 2015.
[15]	刘丽艳. 汉语话语标记研究[M]. 北京: 北京语言大学出版社, 2011.
[16]	潘先军. “你”类话语标记[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016,48(2):103~ 108.
[17]	沈家煊. 语用法的语法化[J]. 福建外语, 1998(2):3~ 5.
[18]	沈家煊. 语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2001,33(2):268~ 275.
[19]	盛继艳. 也谈话语标记“你说”[J]. 汉语学习, 2013(3):31~ 36.
[20]	孙利萍. 论汉语言说类话语标记的基本特征[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012,34(4):138~ 145.
[21]	孙利萍. 言说类话语标记的语篇功能研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版), 2015,13(5):51~ 59.
[22]	孙利萍, 方清明. 汉语话语标记的类型及功能研究综观[J]. 汉语学习, 2011(6):76~ 84.
[23]	汪维辉. 汉语“说类词”的历时演变与共时分布[J]. 中国语文, 2003(4):329~ 342.
[24]	杨才英, 赵春利. 言说类话语标记的句法语义研究[J]. 汉语学报, 2013(3):75~ 84.
[25]	姚占龙. “说、想、看”的主观化及其诱因[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2008(5):47~ 53.
[26]	乐耀. 从“不是我说你”类话语标记的形成看会话中主观性范畴与语用原则的互动[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2011a,25(1):69~ 77.
[27]	乐耀. 国内传信范畴研究综述[J]. 汉语学习, 2011b(1):62~ 72.
[28]	乐耀. 现代汉语传信范畴的性质和概貌[J]. 语文研究, 2014(2):27~ 34.
[29]	张黎. 汉语口语话语标记成分研究[M]. 北京: 北京语言大学出版社, 2017.
[30]	张旺熹, 姚京晶. 汉语人称代词类话语标记系统的主观性差异[J]. 汉语学习, 2009(3):3~ 11.
[31]	钟玲, 李治平. 自然口语中的话语标记“不瞒你说”[J]. 语文知识, 2012(2):110~ 113.