| [1] |
ÄDEL A. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.
|
| [2] |
ÄDEL A & MAURANEN A. Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives[J]. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 2010(S2):1-11.
|
| [3] |
AL-SUBHI A S. Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2022,187:24-40.
|
| [4] |
AULL L L & LANCASTER Z. Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison[J]. Written Communication, 2014(2):151-183.
|
| [5] |
AULL L L, BANDARAGE D & MILLER M R. Generality in student and expert epistemic stance: A corpus analysis of first-year, upper-level, and published academic writing[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2017,26:29-41.
|
| [6] |
BIBER D. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.
|
| [7] |
BIBER D & FINEGAN E. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect[J]. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 1989(1):93-124.
|
| [8] |
CAN T & CANGIR H. A corpus-assisted comparative analysis of self-mention markers in doctoral dissertations of literary studies written in Turkey and the UK[J/OL]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2019,42:100796[2021-07-10]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100796.
|
| [9] |
CHEN Chenghui & ZHANG Lawrence Jun. An intercultural analysis of the use of hedging by Chinese and Anglophone academic English writers[J]. Applied Linguistics Review, 2017(1):1-34.
|
| [10] |
CHEN Yunhan & HUANG Juchuan. One issue, two genres: A comparison of interactional metadiscourse in the news[J]. Pragmatics and Society, 2023(1):47-69.
|
| [11] |
CRISMORE A. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act[M]. New York: Peter Lang Inc.,1989.
|
| [12] |
CRISMORE A, MARKKANEN R & STEFFENSEN M S. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students[J]. Written Communication, 1993(1):39-71.
|
| [13] |
HARRIS Z S. The transformational model of language structure[J]. Anthropological Linguistics, 1959(1):27-29.
|
| [14] |
HO V & LI C. The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students’ timed argumentative essays[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2018,33:53-68.
|
| [15] |
HU Guangwei & CAO Feng. Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2015,39:12-25.
|
| [16] |
HYLAND K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing[M]. London:Continuum, 2005.
|
| [17] |
HYLAND K. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2017,113:16-29.
|
| [18] |
HYLAND K & JIANG Feng Kevin. “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2018,51:18-30.
|
| [19] |
JAKOBSON R. The Framework of Language[M]. Michigan City: Michigan Slavic Publications,1980.
|
| [20] |
JIANG Feng Kevin & HYLAND K. ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing[J]. Discourse Studies, 2015(5):529-550.
|
| [21] |
JIANG Feng Kevin & HYLAND K. Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2018(4):508-531.
|
| [22] |
KAWASE T. Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2015,20:114-124.
|
| [23] |
KHEDRI M, HENG C S & EBRAHIMI S F. An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines[J]. Discourse Studies, 2013(3):319-331.
|
| [24] |
LEE J J & CASAL J. Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering[J]. System, 2014,46:39-54.
|
| [25] |
LEE J J & SUBTIRELU N C. Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2015,37:52-62.
|
| [26] |
MAURANEN A. Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economic texts[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 1993(1):3-22.
|
| [27] |
SWALES J M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1990.
|
| [28] |
SWALES J M. Research Genres: Exploration and Applications[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
|
| [29] |
SWALES J M & FEAK C B. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills[M]. 3rd Ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012.
|
| [30] |
VANDE KOPPLE W. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse[J]. College Composition & Communication, 1985(1):82-93.
|
| [31] |
WILLIAMS J M. Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace[M]. Boston: Scott Foresman,1981.
|
| [32] |
YOON H J & RÖMER U. Quantifying disciplinary voices: An automated approach to interactional metadiscourse in successful student writing[J]. Written Communication, 2020(2):208-244.
|
| [33] |
YUAN Wen, JIN Yue & YANG Yingli. The influence of disciplinary variation and speaker characteristics on the use of hedges and boosters in Zhihu live talks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 2024(1):105-120.
|
| [34] |
ZOU Hang & HYLAND K. Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs[J]. Discourse Studies, 2019(6):713-733.
|
| [35] |
迟培娟, 宋秀芳. 个人学术影响力评价方法比较分析——学术迹与F1000评分、影响因子、被引次数等指标的比较分析[J]. 情报科学, 2018(12):9-12.
|
| [36] |
付晓丽, 徐赳赳. 国际元话语研究新进展[J]. 当代语言学, 2012(3):260-271,329-330.
|
| [37] |
何中清, 闫煜菲. 元话语研究30年——发展、问题和展望[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(1):22-29.
|
| [38] |
季云飞, 姜峰. 国际元话语研究的可视化分析(1990—2019年)[J]. 中国ESP研究, 2020(4):1-12,110.
|
| [39] |
李杰, 陈超美. CiteSpace:科技文本挖掘及可视化[M]. 第2版. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学出版社, 2017.
|
| [40] |
梁文静, 曹瑞斓. 国内元话语研究的可视化分析(1997—2018)[J]. 商务外语研究, 2019(2):12-20.
|
| [41] |
冉志晗, 冉永平. 语篇分析视域下的元话语研究:问题与突破[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2015(2):38-44.
|
| [42] |
唐建萍. 元话语研究述评[J]. 山东外语教学, 2010(1):96-101.
|
| [43] |
辛斌, 王永亮. 批评话语分析的认知心理学基础[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024(4):45-58.
|
| [44] |
徐赳赳. 关于元话语的范围和分类[J]. 当代语言学, 2006(4):345-353,380.
|
| [45] |
吁思敏. 国际元话语研究60年文献计量分析(1959—2019)[J]. 外语教学, 2021(2):40-45.
|
| [46] |
张丹丹, 张敬源. 国内外元话语研究述评:基于CiteSpace可视化分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5):9-16.
|