北京第二外国语学院学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 125-145.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.652

• 青年学者论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国涉外刑事庭审口译伦理体系构建

孙贝1(), 张法连2()   

  1. 1 西北师范大学外国语学院兰州 730070
    2 海南大学学术副校长海口 570228
  • 出版日期:2026-06-30 发布日期:2026-07-08
  • 作者简介:孙贝,博士,西北师范大学外国语学院,730070,研究方向:法律翻译、法治传播。电子邮箱:isuns520@qq.com
    张法连,海南大学学术副校长,教授,博士生导师,570228,研究方向:法律英语、法律翻译、法治传播、法治外交。电子邮箱:franklaw168@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“美国国会涉华法案文本整理、翻译与研究(1979—2019)”(19ZDA168)

Constructing an Ethical Framework for Interpreting in China’s Foreign-Related Criminal Trials

Sun Bei1(), Zhang Falian2()   

  1. 1 Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    2 Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
  • Published:2026-06-30 Online:2026-07-08

摘要:

在全面推进涉外法治建设的背景下,高质量涉外刑事庭审口译是提升中国司法国际公信力、塑造法治中国形象的重要支撑。针对当前我国涉外刑事审判中存在的译员资质准入机制缺位、工作规程标准缺失、质量评估机制空白、权责划分不清等突出问题,本研究立足翻译伦理理论,尝试构建中国涉外刑事庭审口译伦理体系。研究首先厘清了涉外刑事庭审口译的场域属性与伦理内涵,继而确立“忠实准确、中立公正、责任担当”三大核心原则,在此基础上构建“制度—程序—职业”相统一的伦理体系,并从实践维度提出3条实施路径:优化教育体系与内化职业伦理、完善庭审规程与规范程序伦理、健全治理机制与巩固制度伦理,以期为完善我国涉外刑事司法体系提供理论支撑与实践指引。

关键词: 刑事庭审口译; 法庭口译; 口译伦理; 涉外法治

Abstract:

As China advances the construction of its foreign-related rule of law, high-quality court interpreting in criminal trials serves as a pivotal pillar for enhancing the international credibility of the Chinese judiciary and shaping the image of the “Rule of Law in China”. Addressing prevalent issues in current foreign-related criminal trials, such as the absence of an official interpreter accreditation system, the lack of standardized working guidelines, inadequate quality assessment mechanisms, and the ambiguity of rights and responsibilities, this study draws on translation ethics theory to construct an ethical framework for court interpreting in criminal trials. This study first elucidates the field attributes and ethical connotations of court interpreting in criminal trials, then establishes three core principles: fidelity and accuracy, neutrality and impartiality, and professional accountability. Based on these principles, the study constructs an integrated ethical system unifying institutional, procedural and professional ethics. Finally, from a practical perspective, three implementation paths are proposed: internalizing professional ethics through an optimized education system, regulating procedural ethics via courtroom guidelines, and perfecting institutional ethics through governance mechanisms. This study seeks to provide theoretical underpinnings and practical guidance for ensuring procedural justice and protecting the rights of parties in foreign-related criminal proceedings.

Keywords: court interpreting in criminal trials; court interpreting; interpreting ethics; foreign-related rule of law

中图分类号: