北京第二外国语学院学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 93-116.DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.620
出版日期:2025-12-30
发布日期:2026-01-29
作者简介:陈会军,博士,中国地质大学(北京)外国语学院教授,100083,研究方向:语篇分析、写作研究。电子邮箱:chenhuijun@cugb.edu.cn;基金资助:Online:2025-12-30
Published:2026-01-29
摘要:
传统的写作“主体”和“主体间性”概念关注人的因素在写作活动中的作用,但写作主体往往局限于作者和读者,写作的主体间性也局限于作者与读者之间的互动关系。本文尝试从活动理论出发,将写作看作社会活动的过程,对写作主体和主体间性进行再定义,并以英文科学实验报告为例,阐释写作主体的内涵以及写作主体间性的构成机制。本文认为,作为一种社会活动,写作活动的主体不仅包括作者和目标读者,还包括写作对象、写作工具、文本作品及上述因素所处的微观和宏观社会文化语境。写作活动的完成就是这些主体因素之间相互作用的结果。这些相互作用构成写作的主体间性,主要表现为共享、互动和动态统一3种形式。本研究致力于对写作本质进行探讨,以期加深对写作本质特别是英文学术写作本质的认识,并为学术英语写作实践和教学提供启示。
中图分类号:
陈会军, 于洋. 写作的主体间性构成机制——以英文科学实验报告写作为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2025, 47(6): 93-116.
Chen Huijun, Yu Yang. Mechanisms of Intersubjectivity in Writing: An Analysis of Scientific Experimental Reports[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2025, 47(6): 93-116.
| [1] | BARRESI J & MOORE C. Understanding self and other[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1996(1):142-154. |
| [2] | BHATIA V K. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings[M]. London:Routledge, 1993. |
| [3] | BRANDT D. Toward an understanding of context in composition[J]. Written Communication, 1986(3):139-157. |
| [4] | BRANDT D. The cognitive as the social: An ethnomethodogical approach to writing process research[J]. Written Communication, 1992(3):315-355. |
| [5] | BRINCK I. The role of intersubjectivity in the development of intentional communication[C]//ZLATEV J,RACINE T P,SINHA C,et al. The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company,2008:115-140. |
| [6] | BRUNER J S. The Culture of Education[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1996. |
| [7] | COELHO N E & FIGUEIREDO L C. Patterns of intersubjectivity in the constitution of subjectivity: Dimensions of otherness[J]. Culture & Psychology, 2003(3):193-208. |
| [8] | COLE M. Conclusion[C] //RESNICK L B,LEVINE J M & TEASLEY S D. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association,1991:398-417. |
| [9] | CROSSLEY N. Intersubjectivity: The Fabric of Social Becoming[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 1996. |
| [10] | DAY R A. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper [M]. 3rd Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. |
| [11] | DE QUINCEY C. Intersubjectivity: Exploring consciousness from the second-person perspective[J]. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 2000(2):135-155. |
| [12] | ENGESTRÖM Y. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research[M]. Helsinki:Orienta-Konsultit, 1987. |
| [13] | ENGESTRÖM Y. Activity theory and individual and social transformation[C]//ENGESTRÖM Y,MIETTINEN R & PUNAMÄKI R L. Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1999:19-38. |
| [14] | FARRELL T J. Writing the writer, and Lonergan: Authenticity and intersubjectivity[C]//FARRELL T J & SOUKUP P A. Communication and Lonergan: Common Ground for Forging the New Age. Kansas City: Sheed and Ward,1993:23-47. |
| [15] | FLOWER L. The Construction of Negotiated Meaning: A Social Cognitive Theory of Writing[M]. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1994. |
| [16] | FOX T. Analyzing language in terms of the intersubjectivity of communities and authority[J]. Reader, 1984, 11:38-48. |
| [17] | FREEDMAN A & MEDWAY P. Genre and the New Rhetoric[M]. London:Routledge, 1994. |
| [18] | GILBERT G N & MULKAY M. Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984. |
| [19] | GRAETZ N. Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts[C]//ULIJN J M & PUGH A K. Reading for Professional Purposes: Methods and Materials in Teaching Languages. Leuven:ACCO,1985:123-135. |
| [20] | GROSS A G. Analogy and intersubjectivity: Political oratory, scholarly argument and scientific reports[J]. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1983(1):37-46. |
| [21] | GUBERN M M. Contextual factors enhancing cognitive and metacognitive activity during the process of collaborative writing[C]//RIJLAARSDAM G,BERGH H & COUZIJN M. Effective Learning and Teaching of Writing: A Handbook of Writing in Education. 2nd Ed. Dordrecht:Springer,2005:59-76. |
| [22] | HALLIDAY M A K & HASAN R. The structure of a text[M]//HALLIDAY M A K & HASAN R. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press,1985:52-69. |
| [23] | HASAN R. Ways of Saying: Ways of Meaning[M]. London:Cassell, 1996. |
| [24] | HAYES J R & FLOWER L. Identifying the organization of writing processes[C]//GREGG L W & STEINBERG E R. Cognitive Processes in Writing. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum,1980:3-30. |
| [25] | HYLAND K. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles[J]. Written Communication, 2001(4):549-574. |
| [26] | HYLAND K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing[M]. London:Continuum, 2005a. |
| [27] | HYLAND K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse[J]. Discourse Studies, 2005b(2):173-192. |
| [28] | HYLAND K. Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2007(2):266-285. |
| [29] | IVANIČ R. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998. |
| [30] | KAPTELININ V & NARDI B A. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. |
| [31] | KUO C H. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 1999(2):121-138. |
| [32] | LAVE J & WENGER E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. |
| [33] | LIGORIO M B, TALAMO A & PONTECORVO C. Building intersubjectivity at a distance during the collaborative writing of fairytales[J]. Computers & Education, 2005(3):357-374. |
| [34] | MARTIN J R. Modelling context: A crooked path of progress in contextual linguistics[C]// GHADESSY M. Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company,1999:25-61. |
| [35] | MELTZOFF A N & BROOKS R. Intersubjectivity before language: Three windows on preverbal sharing[C]//BRÅTEN S. On Being Moved: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company,2007:149-174. |
| [36] | PETERLIN A. Translating metadiscourse in research articles[J]. Across Languages and Culture, 2005(2):205-218. |
| [37] | PINHEIRO M A & SIMÃO L M. Creativity and fiction: Interpretative horizons on the emergence of the new in the relationship between individual and culture[J]. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2021(1):1-17. |
| [38] | ROMMETVEIT R. On the architecture of intersubjectivity[C]//ROMMETVEIT R & BLAKAR R M. Studies of Language, Thought and Communication. London: Academic Press,1979:93-107. |
| [39] | ROMMETVEIT R. Intersubjective attunement and linguistically mediated meaning in discourse[C] //BRÅTEN S. Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1998:354-371. |
| [40] | SCHEGLOFF E A. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1992(5):1295-1345. |
| [41] | SWALES J M. Metatalk in American academic talk: The cases of ‘Point’ and ‘Thing’[J]. Journal of English Linguistics, 2001(1):34-54. |
| [42] | TANTUCCI V. From co-actionality to extended intersubjectivity: Drawing on language change and ontogenetic development[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2020(2):185-214. |
| [43] | TAVORY I. A theory of intersubjectivity: Experience, interaction and the anchoring of meaning[J]. Theory and Society, 2023(5):865-884. |
| [44] | THOMPSON G. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2001(1):58-78. |
| [45] | TIRASSA M & BOSCO F M. On the nature and role of intersubjectivity in human communication[C]//MORGANTI F,CARASSA A & RIVA G. Enacting Intersubjectivity: A Cognitive and Social Perspective on the Study of Interactions. Amsterdam: IOS Press,2008:81-95. |
| [46] | VERHAGEN A. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. |
| [47] | WARGO J M. Remixed recipes and mimicked mentor texts: Reading young children’s play (Giarism) as complex scenes of early writing[J]. Early Childhood Education Journal, 2024(6):1-10. |
| [48] | ZLATEV J, RACINE T, SINHA C, et al. The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2008. |
| [49] | ZOLOTH L & CHARON R. Like an open book: Reliability, intersubjectivity, and textuality in bioethics[C]//CHARON R & MONTELLO M. Stories Matter: The Role of Narrative in Medical Ethics. New York: Routledge,2002:21-37. |
| [50] | 陈会军. 语篇样类特征分析和认知模式[M]. 北京: 外文出版社, 2003. |
| [51] | 丁昳玲. 基于主体间性的商务英语写作[J]. 教育现代化, 2016(35):159-160. |
| [52] | 洪治纲. 论非虚构写作中的主体情感与观念[J]. 文学评论, 2022(5):112-120. |
| [53] | 黄治国, 李银兵. 主体间性视域下的民族志书写[J]. 广西民族研究, 2017(6):54-61. |
| [54] | 李婧妍. 主体间性视域下余华小说叙事伦理的嬗变[J]. 当代作家评论, 2024(6):176-181. |
| [55] | 梁鸿. 非虚构文学的审美特征和主体间性[J]. 中国现代文学研究丛刊, 2021(7):90-100. |
| [56] | 苗兴伟, 李珂. 主体间性视角下生态身份的话语建构[J]. 英语研究, 2022(2):154-165. |
| [57] | 欧阳友权. 网络写作的主体间性[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2006(4):93-99. |
| [58] | 阮晓蕾. 文化历史活动理论、拓展性学习与革新实验室——芬兰赫尔辛基大学Yrjö Engeström教授访谈录[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022(6):102-113. |
| [59] | 涂慧. 从他者凝视到主体建构——加拿大英语文学动物书写在当代欧美的接受阐释[J]. 外国文学研究, 2022(4):164-176. |
| [60] | 王娟娟. 基于双重认知主体的蓄意隐喻动态主体间性[J]. 外语教学, 2021(2):35-39,54. |
| [61] | 王强. 交往行为理论视角下英语学术语篇中元话语对主体间性的构建研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2016. |
| [62] | 王涛. 试论网络媒介影响下文学创作中主体间性的生成——以“80后”创作中的身体修辞变化为例[J]. 当代文坛, 2016(2):137-140. |
| [63] | 许栋梁. 走向“自创生美学”:后人文主义与“作者之死”后的写作主体性重构[J]. 云南社会科学, 2025(1):171-180. |
| [64] | 薛丽娜, 王永亮. 活动理论视角下英语教师专业学习共同体发展中的矛盾与行动——以中国文化课程建设为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2025(2):128-144. |
| [65] | 颜翔林. 文体意识和主体间性——评王充闾历史散文的写作[J]. 当代作家评论, 2004(2):114-119. |
| [66] | 杨春时. 论文学的主体性与主体间性复式结构[J]. 广东社会科学, 2023(5):172-181,288. |
| [67] | 阴雅婷. 从主体性、主客间性到主体间性:人与数字技术的交互伦理关系[J]. 新闻爱好者, 2024(10):49-52. |
| [68] | 张辉. 批评认知语言学与主体间性[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023(1):30-49. |
| [1] | 薛丽娜, 王永亮. 活动理论视角下英语教师专业学习共同体发展中的矛盾与行动——以中国文化课程建设为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2025, 47(2): 128-144. |
| [2] | 阮晓蕾. 文化历史活动理论、拓展性学习与革新实验室——芬兰赫尔辛基大学Yrjö Engeström教授访谈录[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(6): 102-113. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
