同伴互动对英语课堂学习投入的影响——以学业自我效能感为中介

doi:10.12002/j.bisu.590

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究采用描述性分析、回归分析与结构方程建模，对1143名非英语专业大学生的问卷调查数据进行了统计分析，并对部分学生开展半结构式访谈，旨在考察以学业自我效能感为中介的同伴互动对英语课堂学习投入的影响。研究表明：同伴互动内容和同伴互动方式均正向预测课堂学习投入三维度（认知、行为和情感），同伴资源认知正向预测行为投入和认知投入，但对情感投入未产生显著影响；同伴互动既能够直接正向预测课堂学习投入，也可以通过学业自我效能感对课堂学习投入产生间接影响，学业自我效能感在同伴互动与英语课堂学习投入的关系中起着中介作用。访谈转写分析印证了上述量化结果。本研究有助于深化对同伴互动和英语课堂学习投入之间路径关系的理解，为教师从同伴互动和学业自我效能感两个方面提升课堂学习投入提供启示。

关键词: 同伴互动; 课堂学习投入; 学业自我效能感; 大学英语

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to explore the influence of peer interaction on learning engagement in English classrooms through the mediating effect of academic self-efficacy. The study’s participants were 1,143 non-English majors; the quantitative data were analyzed via a descriptive analysis, a multiple regression analysis, and structural equation modeling. Some of the participants were then invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. The results revealed that the content and mode of peer interaction were both positive predicters of the three dimensions of learning engagement; while the perception of peer resources positively predicted cognitive and behavioral engagement, it did not significantly affect emotional engagement. Moreover, peer interaction was a direct positive predicter of learning engagement in English classrooms; it also indirectly affected learning engagement via academic self-efficacy, with academic self-efficacy playing a mediating role in the relationship between peer interaction and learning engagement in English classrooms. The transcription and analysis of the interviews confirmed these quantitative results. The study enhances the understanding of the path relationship between peer interaction and learning engagement in English classrooms, thereby providing insights for teachers to improve learning engagement through both peer interaction and academic self-efficacy.

Keywords: peer interaction; learning engagement in English classrooms; academic self-efficacy; college English

中图分类号:

H319

李文静, 任庆梅. 同伴互动对英语课堂学习投入的影响——以学业自我效能感为中介[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2025, 47(3): 106-123.

Li Wenjing, Ren Qingmei. The Influence of Peer Interactions on Learning Engagement in English Classrooms: The Mediating Effect of Academic Self-Efficacy[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2025, 47(3): 106-123.

图/表 5

参考文献 41

[1]	BANDURA A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control[M]. New York: Freeman,1997.
[2]	DAO P & MCDONOUGH K. Effect of proficiency on Vietnamese EFL learners’ engagement in peer interaction[J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 2018,88:60-72.
[3]	ELLIS R. Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy[M]. Malden:Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
[4]	FREDRICKS J A, RESCHLY A L & CHRISTENSON S L. Interventions for student engagement: Overview and state of the field[C]//FREDRICKS J A,RESCHLY A L & CHRISTENSON S L. Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions: Working with Disengaged Students. London: Academic Press,2019:1-11.
[5]	HIVER P, MERCER S & AL-HOORIE A H. Introduction[C]//HIVER P,AL-HOORIE A H & MERCER S. Student Engagement in the Language Classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters,2021:1-13.
[6]	HUNSU N J, OLAOGUN O P, OJE A V, et al. Investigating students’ motivational goals and self-efficacy and task beliefs in relationship to course attendance and prior knowledge in an undergraduate statics course[J]. Journal of Engineering Education, 2023(1):108-124.
[7]	KAYSER J D, MIELKE-CHRISTENSEN A, ØSTERGAARD D, et al. Promoting medical student engagement through co-development and peer-assisted learning: A new patient safety course as a case study[J/OL]. Advances in Simulation, 2022,7:17[2022-08-21]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00212-5.
[8]	KENT D. Technique efficacy when using a student response system in the reading classroom[J]. Language Learning & Technology, 2019(1):26-35.
[9]	KIM Y H. Willingness to engage: The importance of what learners bring to pair work[J]. Language Awareness, 2020(2):134-154.
[10]	KUO Tonny Menglun, TSAI Chin-Chung & WANG Jyun-Cheng. Linking web-based learning self-efficacy and learning engagement in MOOCs: The role of online academic hardiness[J/OL]. The Internet and Higher Education, 2021,51:100819[2022-03-04]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100819.
[11]	LAM S F, BERNARD P H W, YANG Hongfei, et al. Understanding student engagement with a contextual model[C]//CHRISTENSON S L,RESCHLY A L & WYLIE C. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer,2012:403-419.
[12]	LAMBERT C & ZHANG G. Engagement in the use of English and Chinese as foreign languages: The role of learner-generated content in instructional task design[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2019(2):391-411.
[13]	LI Ling, PENG Zhenfei, LU Liucun, et al. Peer relationships, self-efficacy, academic motivation, and mathematics achievement in Zhuang adolescents: A moderated mediation model[J/OL]. Children and Youth Services Review, 2020,118:105358[2021-02-04]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105358.
[14]	LUAN Lin, HONG Jon-chao, CAO Miao, et al. Exploring the role of online EFL learners’ perceived social support in their learning engagement: A structural equation model[J]. Interactive Learning Environments, 2023(3):1703-1714.
[15]	PHILP J, ADAMS R & IWASHITA N. Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning[M]. New York: Routledge, 2013.
[16]	RESCHLY A L & CHRISTENSON S L. Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct[C]//CHRISTENSON S L,RESCHLY A L & WYLIE C. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer,2012:3-19.
[17]	SHAO Yanhong & KANG Shumin. The association between peer relationship and learning engagement among adolescents: The chain mediating roles of self-efficacy and academic resilience[J/OL]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022,13:938756[2023-02-03]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938756.
[18]	VYGOTSKY L S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1978.
[19]	YU Shulin, ZHANG Yiran, ZHENG Yao, et al. Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study[J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019(1):50-65.
[20]	ZANDER L, BROUWER J, JANSEN E, et al. Academic self-efficacy, growth mindsets, and university students’ integration in academic and social support networks[J]. Learning and Individual Differences, 2018,62:98-107.
[21]	ZOU Di, XIE Haoran & WANG Fu Lee. Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning[J]. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2023,35:166-185.
[22]	陈丹丹. 动态评价视角下网络同伴互评对英语写作质量的影响[J]. 外语电化教学, 2021(2):3,17-23.
[23]	范玉梅. 任务类型对同伴互动中学习者投入的影响研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2019(6):29-37.
[24]	范玉梅, 徐锦芬. 同伴熟悉度对同伴互动中学习者投入的影响研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2021(2):82-91,149-150.
[25]	甘少杰, 翟睿轩, 韩思雯. 大学生同伴互动对学习投入的影响研究——以学习效能感为中介变量[J]. 贵州师范学院学报, 2023(8):68-77.
[26]	高瑞阔, 唐胜虹. 中国大学生的英语学习同伴资源运用状况调查[J]. 现代外语, 2014(5):668-678,730-731.
[27]	耿峰, 于书林. 英语议论文写作中学习者对同伴反馈的投入研究[J]. 外语教育研究前沿, 2023(1):67-74.
[28]	耿峰, 于书林, 王俊菊. 同伴反馈对提升英语辩论文思辨质量的有效性研究[J]. 外语界, 2021(3):37-45.
[29]	姜毅超, 庄绍勇, 张宜, 等. 大学生英语学习效能感量表的初步编制[J]. 外语测试与教学, 2020(2):1-11,27.
[30]	李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 等. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023(1):58-67.
[31]	刘宝存, 苟鸣瀚. 普及化时代高质量高等教育体系建设的现实背景与可行路径[J]. 现代教育管理, 2023(1):1-11.
[32]	刘琼, 甄玲. 自我效能感对大学生英语自主学习能力的影响——以学习投入为中介作用[J]. 西南交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(6):71-81.
[33]	任庆梅. 大学生英语课堂学习投入多维评价体系的理论框架[J]. 外语界, 2021(2):37-45.
[34]	任庆梅. 大学生英语课堂学习投入多维评价量表编制与检测[J]. 山东外语教学, 2022(4):58-66.
[35]	阮晓蕾. 文化历史活动理论、拓展性学习与革新实验室——芬兰赫尔辛基大学Yrjö Engeström教授访谈录[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022(6):102-113.
[36]	王菲. 学术写作课堂同伴互动低效的原因分析——基于四名中外博士生视角的个案研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2019(2):92-99,149-150.
[37]	王铭玉, 张艳凤. 新时代中国高等教育的使命与担当[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2023(6):3-20.
[38]	徐锦芬. 二语学习同伴互动研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2020.
[39]	张凯, 李玉, 陈凯泉. 情绪体验与互动模式对合作学习情感投入的作用机理[J]. 现代外语, 2023(3):371-383.
[40]	张宜, 姜毅超. 国内外语学习效能感测量研究综述[J]. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(6):98-106.
[41]	朱妮娅. 生态课堂教学对小组口语报告质量的作用——以同伴支架的运用为例[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2018(1):101-109,149-150.

构念	维度	题项范例	Cronbach’s α系数	KMO取样适切性	Bartlett球形度检验值
同伴互动	同伴资源认知	我认为同伴是重要的英语学习资源	0.943	0.949	14821.933^***
	同伴互动内容	与同伴交流学习的内容不限于老师布置的话题和任务
	同伴互动方式	经常变换方式进行同伴互动（如相互纠错、相互指导等）
英语课堂学习投入	认知投入	我完成英语作业并确保它是正确的	0.935	0.948	9967.690^***
	行为投入	我按时完成作业
	情感投入	我在英语课上感觉很好
学业自我效能感	学习行为效能	对今后的英语学习，我有自己的目标并能坚持执行学习计划	0.940	0.948	11413.139^***
学业自我效能感	语言运用效能	看英语视频时，即使没有字幕，我也能听得懂大意	0.940	0.948	11413.139^***

构念	维度	题项范例	Cronbach’s α系数	KMO取样适切性	Bartlett球形度检验值
同伴互动	同伴资源认知	我认为同伴是重要的英语学习资源	0.943	0.949	14821.933^***
	同伴互动内容	与同伴交流学习的内容不限于老师布置的话题和任务
	同伴互动方式	经常变换方式进行同伴互动（如相互纠错、相互指导等）
英语课堂学习投入	认知投入	我完成英语作业并确保它是正确的	0.935	0.948	9967.690^***
	行为投入	我按时完成作业
	情感投入	我在英语课上感觉很好
学业自我效能感	学习行为效能	对今后的英语学习，我有自己的目标并能坚持执行学习计划	0.940	0.948	11413.139^***
学业自我效能感	语言运用效能	看英语视频时，即使没有字幕，我也能听得懂大意	0.940	0.948	11413.139^***

变量	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1同伴资源认知	1
2同伴互动内容	0.608^**	1
3同伴互动方式	0.516^**	0.752^**	1
4认知投入	0.347^**	0.475^**	0.484^**	1
5行为投入	0.382^**	0.508^**	0.527^**	0.756^**	1
6情感投入	0.351^**	0.488^**	0.530^**	0.664^**	0.701^**	1
7学习行为效能	0.388^**	0.541^**	0.543^**	0.705^**	0.698^**	0.701^**	1
8语言运用效能	0.292^**	0.504^**	0.651^**	0.481^**	0.498^**	0.569^**	0.598^**	1
均值	3.889	3.469	3.182	3.742	3.694	3.570	3.692	2.979
标准差	0.687	0.840	0.839	0.704	0.713	0.825	0.747	0.908

变量	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1同伴资源认知	1
2同伴互动内容	0.608^**	1
3同伴互动方式	0.516^**	0.752^**	1
4认知投入	0.347^**	0.475^**	0.484^**	1
5行为投入	0.382^**	0.508^**	0.527^**	0.756^**	1
6情感投入	0.351^**	0.488^**	0.530^**	0.664^**	0.701^**	1
7学习行为效能	0.388^**	0.541^**	0.543^**	0.705^**	0.698^**	0.701^**	1
8语言运用效能	0.292^**	0.504^**	0.651^**	0.481^**	0.498^**	0.569^**	0.598^**	1
均值	3.889	3.469	3.182	3.742	3.694	3.570	3.692	2.979
标准差	0.687	0.840	0.839	0.704	0.713	0.825	0.747	0.908

模型			R	R²	∆R²	F（3，1139）	Std. Beta	t (1006)	p value	Collinearity Statistics
模型			R	R²	∆R²	F（3，1139）	Std. Beta	t (1006)	p value	Tolerance	VIF
Ⅰ	同伴资源认知	认知投入	0.515^a	0.265	0.264	137.236	0.066	2.049^*	0.041	0.622	1.607
	同伴互动内容						0.223	5.331^**	0.000	0.368	2.717
	同伴互动方式						0.282	7.268^**	0.000	0.428	2.335
Ⅱ	同伴资源认知	行为投入	0.558^a	0.311	0.309	171.381	0.086	2.755^**	0.006	0.622	1.607
	同伴互动内容						0.213	5.246^**	0.000	0.368	2.717
	同伴互动方式						0.323	8.591^**	0.000	0.428	2.335
Ⅲ	同伴资源认知	情感投入	0.549^a	0.301	0.299	163.519	0.052	1.654	0.098	0.622	1.607
	同伴互动内容						0.179	4.393^**	0.000	0.368	2.717
	同伴互动方式						0.368	9.731^**	0.000	0.428	2.335