Please wait a minute...
北京第二外国语学院学报  2016, Vol. 38 Issue (5): 90-100    DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.2016.035
外国文学研究     
《饥饿游戏》中的空间暴力审美批判
王影君
王影君,上海理工大学外语学院
Aesthetic Criticism of the Spatial Violence in The Hunger Games
WANG Yingjun
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
 全文: PDF(739 KB)   [HTML]()
摘要: 《饥饿游戏》是美国作家苏珊?柯林斯的新锐异乌托邦小说,展现出后资本主义的社会危机。其诸多暴力描写屡受批评,但暴力审美恰是其主要特色,本文借后马克思主义理论家齐泽克的暴力理论,以批判立场力图分析揭露该审美背后制度危机之本质。资本对最大空间极端的占有欲催生了以空间暴力政治为特征的极权统治,空间隔离成为资本获得最大牟利的必要手段,暴力成为维护空间隔离的有效保障。多重暴力与空间隔离紧密组合,成为维护资本极权统治的最强大根基。而如何以他者暴力冲破主流政治的空间隔离,打破极权机制重获自由,成为小说深厚的暴力审美主题。该审美因此充满以暴抗暴的批判力度,被规训的他者正是基于以暴抗暴,自主自为的主体权力欲求获得觉醒。
关键词: 饥饿游戏空间暴力政治权力大众传媒异乌托邦    
Abstract: The Hunger Games, a current popular dystopian fiction written by American writer Suzanne Collins, reveals the social crises of the post-capitalism time. It stirs up the harsh criticism for its many violent depictions, but it is the depictions of violence that make it special. From a critical viewpoint of aesthetics of violence, this paper tries to use the theory of violence of post-Marxist Slavoj Zizek to analyze and dig out that the essential root of the crises in the novel is the capitalism system itself in the post capitalist era. The extreme desire of capitalism is to occupy extreme capital space that leads to the building up of the totalitarian governance at the base of spatial violent politics in the novel. The spatial isolation becomes the most necessary device for making biggest profits; while violence becomes the most effective security to remain the spatial isolation. The close union of multiple violence and spatial isolation becomes the strongest foundation of the totalitarianism of capitalist society. Then it becomes the impressive theme of the aesthetics of violence of the novel—how the governed can employ the violence of the other’s to break the spatial isolation and destroy the totalitarian system of the social mainstream to win back their own liberty. Therefore, the aesthetics of violence in the novel is full of power of critical aesthetics with violence against violence. Based on such critical aesthetics of violence, the forces of self-consciousness and self-activity of the disciplined others are awakening for their subjective rights on the way when violence against violence.
Key words: The Huger Games    spatial violent politics    power    mass media    dystopia
收稿日期: 2016-03-04 出版日期: 2018-03-20
PACS:  I-06  
基金资助: 本文为上海理工大学博士基金项目;辽宁省社会科学规划基金“空间想象与权力话语意识形态批判——异乌托邦小说研究”(项目编号:L11DWW005)研究成果。
作者简介: 王影君,上海理工大学外语学院,200093,研究方向:英美文学及西方文论。电子邮箱:wangyingjun2004@sina.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
王影君

引用本文:

王影君. 《饥饿游戏》中的空间暴力审美批判[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2016, 38(5): 90-100.

WANG Yingjun. Aesthetic Criticism of the Spatial Violence in The Hunger Games. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2016, 38(5): 90-100.

链接本文:

https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/10.12002/j.bisu.2016.035        https://journal.bisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2016/V38/I5/90

[1]Benjamin,Walter. The Critique of Violence[M]. Newyork:Shocken Books,1978: 278. [2]Lefebvre,Henry. The Production of Space[M]. Donald Nicholson-Smith(Trans.). Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,1991. [3]Spivak,Gayatri. Feminism and critical theory[A]. In Donna Landry & Gerald McLean(Eds.). The Spivak Reader[C]. New York and London:Routledge,1996:62. [4]Collins,Suzanne. The Hunger Games[M]. New York:Scholastic Press,2009:4, 19,223. [5]Brown,Wendy. Walled States,Waning Sovereignty[M]. New York:Zone Books, 2010:8. [6]Zizek,Slavoj. Violence:Six Sideways Reflections[M]. London:Profile Books Ltd., 2009:1~2,22,122. [7]海德格尔. 路标[M]. 孙周兴译. 北京:商务印书馆,2001:373. [8]米歇尔•福柯. 规训与惩罚:监狱的诞生[M]. 刘北成,杨远婴译. 北京:生活•读书•新知三联出版社,1999:224~228,233. [9]米歇尔•福柯. 权力的眼睛——福柯访谈录[M]. 严锋译. 上海:上海人民出版社,1997:149. [10]米歇尔•福柯. 安全机制、空间与环境[A]. 汪民安主编. 福柯读本[C]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2010:151. [11]特里•伊格尔顿. 马克思为什么是对的[M]. 李杨,任文科,郑义译. 北京:新星出版社,2011:61. [12]约翰•厄里. 社会关系、空间与时间[M]. 景天魁,朱红文主编. 社会关系与空间结构. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011:19.
[1] 翟 康. 叶芝诗歌中文学与历史的对话——以《1916年复活节》为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2016, 38(5): 101-110.
[2] 刘立华 徐硕. 习近平主席“一带一路”话语创新实践案例研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2016, 38(3): 19-30.
[3] 谭敏.
一个尼采式英雄的悲剧——《干扰》的悲剧英雄形象分析
[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2016, 38(3): 110-121.
[4] 刘 燕. 夏洛蒂·勃朗特、《简·爱》及其“爱尔兰性”[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2014, 36(12): 46-.