Please wait a minute...
北京第二外国语学院学报  2016, Vol. 38 Issue (3): 31-51    DOI: 10.12002/j.bisu.2016.033
Functional Phase Approach to Peripherial Sequence Derivation and Interpretations
ZHANG Lianwen
Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
 全文: PDF(820 KB)   [HTML]()
摘要: 本文结合信息结构和表征理论(RT)梳理了量化话题和焦点,在语段理论视阈和推导下探究了边界信息结构以及事件与语段功能边界。汉语等语言的话题、焦点成分都可在表达信息结构属性的CP语段左边界中解释,信息结构具有普遍性。信息结构(IS)对有限定语的量化语句产生语义效应。证实了结构的层次“L-标记”集。功能语段模式允准主题特征与焦点特征触发边界推导。信息结构由语序和韵律显著性标记;事件结构与功能层次互动。话题化存在递归CP语段分解。旨在探索话题/焦点解释调用的句法—概念系统—信息结构—语篇互动的接口关联。
关键词: 信息结构边界功能语段接口量化主题    
Abstract: This article investigates quantificational topics and foci combined with information structure and representational theory. And particularly under phase theory we make a further inquiry into peripheral information structure, events and functional phase edges. The research herein shows that Chinese topics together with the topics and foci in Indo-European languages can be incorporated into the left edges of CP phases representing information-structure properties, and additionally that information structure presents cross-linguistic universality. Information structure produces semantic effects on sentences with QNPs modified by determiners. It testifies the L-marked set of structural levels. Functional phase model can license [+topic] and [+foc] edge features triggering peripheral derivations. IS can be marked by word order and prosodic prominence. And event structure can interact with functional layers. Topicalization and informational focalization as grammatical operations follow inclusiveness condition, and are also driven by pragmatic convergent conditions. Functional phases CP and vP domains show similarities in the periphery of clauses whereby hanging topics get full interpretation. Topicalization involves recursive phasal decompositions. The paper aims to explore the interactive interface relations of syntax-CS-IS-discourse invoked for the interpretations of topics and foci.
Key words: information structure(IS)    phasal edges    functional phases    interface    quantificational topics
收稿日期: 2015-12-08 出版日期: 2018-03-20
PACS:  H0-05  
作者简介: 张连文,山东农业大学教授,271018,研究方向:语言学、句法学、语义学、认知语言学。电子邮箱
E-mail Alert


张连文. 功能语段视域下边界成分推导和解释探析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2016, 38(3): 31-51.

ZHANG Lianwen. Functional Phase Approach to Peripherial Sequence Derivation and Interpretations. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2016, 38(3): 31-51.


[1]Abels, K. The Italian left periphery: A view from locality [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 2012(2): 229—254.
[2]Bahtchevanova, M. D. Mood, modality and complementation: A cross-linguistic study of the syntax and semantics of the left periphery [D]. Tempe, Arizona: Arizona State University, 2007.
[3]Belletti, A. Structures and Strategies [M]. New York: Routledge, 2009.
[4]Büring, D. Semantics, intonation, and information structure [A]. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007:445—473.
[5]Butler, J. Phase structure, phrase structure, and quantification [D]. York: York University, 2004.
[6]Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax [M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1965.
[7]Chomsky, N. On phases [A]. In R. Freidin, C. Otero & M.L. Zubizaretta (Eds.). Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory [C]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008:133—166.
[8]Cinque, G. Restructuring and functional structure [A]. In A. Belletti (Ed.). Structures and Beyond [C]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2004: 132—191.
[9]Citko, B. Phase Theory. An Introduction [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[10]Cormack, A. & N. Smith. Modals and negation in English [A]. In S. Barbiers et al.(Eds.). Modality &Its Interaction with the Verbal System [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002: 133—163.
[11]Culicover, P.W. Natural Language Syntax [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[12]Dalrymple, M.& I. Nikolaeva. Objects and Information Structure [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
[13]Diesing, M. Indefinites[M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1992.
[14]Drubig, H. B. Phases and the typology of focus constructions [A]. In K. Shwabe &S. Winkler (Eds.).On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007:33—66.
[15]Endriss, C. Quantificational Topics: A Scopal Treatment of Exceptional Wide Scope Phenomena [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2009. 
[16]Erteschik-Shir, N. On the architecture of topic and focus [A]. In V. Molnár & S. Winkler (Eds.). The Architecture of Focus[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006: 33—57.
[17]Féry, C. & M. Krifka. Information structure: notional distinctions, ways of expression [A]. In P. van Sterkenburg (Ed.). Unity and Diversity of Languages[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008:123—136.
[18]Frey, W. Pragmatic properties of certain German and English left peripheral constructions [J]. Linguistics, 2005(43):89—129. 
[19]Funakoshi, K. Syntactic head movement and its consequence[D]. Maryland:University of Maryland, College Park, 2014.
[20]Gallego, Á. J. Phase Theory [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010.
[21]Gundel, J. K. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory [M]. New York: Garland, 1989.
[22]Haegeman, L. Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD, and the left periphery [A]. In R. Zanuttini et al. (Eds.). Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics[C]. Washington: Georgetown University Press,2006:27—52.
[23]Horvath, J. Discourse-features, syntactic displacement and the status of contrast [J]. Lingua, 2010(120):1346—1369.
[24]Jackendoff, R. Foundations of Language [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[25]Kayne, R. On parameters and on principles of pronunciation [A]. In H. Broekhuis et al. (Eds.). Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk [C]. Berlin: De Gryuter, 2005: 289—299.
[26]Kayne, R. & J. Y. Pollock. Stylistic inversion, successive cyclicity, and move NP in French [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 2001(9): 595—621.
[27]Kempson, R., R. Cann & J. Kiaer. Topic, focus and the structural dynamics of language [A]. In V. Molnár & S. Winkler (Eds.). The Architecture of Focus[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006:59—82.
[28]Kidwai, A. XP-Adjunction in Universal Grammar Scrambling and Binding in Hindi-Urdu [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2000.
[29]Kinsella,A. R. Language Evolution and Syntactic Theory [M]. Cambridge:CUP, 2009.
[30]Kiss, K. É. (Ed.). Adverbs and Adverbial Adjuncts at the Interfaces [C]. Berlin: Mouton, 2009.
[31]Krifka, M. A Compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions[A].In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (Ed.) Semantics: Critical Concepts in Linguistics Volume VI[C]. London: Routledge, 2003:33—72.
[32]Lambrecht, K. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[33]Liu, Haitao. Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty [J]. Journal of Cognitive Science, 2008 (2):159—191.
[34]Mereu, L. (Ed.). Information Structure and its Interfaces [C]. Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009.
[35]Olsvay, C. A syntactic analysis of negative universal in Hungarian [D]. MA Thesis, Eötvös University, Budapest, 2000.
[36]Ott, D. C. Local instability: the syntax of split topics [D]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, 2011.
[37]Pan, Haihua & Jianhua Hu. Prominence and locality in the binding of mandarin complex reflexive “ta-ziji (s/he-self)”[J]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph, 2003(19):152—170.
[38]Peters, S. & D. Westerståhl. Quantifiers in Language and Logic [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[39]Platzack, C. Backward binding and the C-T phase: a case of syntactic haplology [A]. In A. Brugé et al. (Eds). Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 7[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[40]Pollock, J.-Y. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP [J]. Linguistic Inquiry,1989(32): 365—424.
[41]Reinhart, T. Topics and conceptual interface [A]. In H. Kamp & B. Partee (Eds.). Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning [C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004:275—305.
[42]Rizzi, L. The fine structure of the left periphery [A]. In L. Haegeman (Ed.). Elements of Grammar [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997 :281—338.
[43]Rizzi, L. Locality and left periphery[A]. In A. Belletti (Ed.). Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Vol 3[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004a:223—251.
[44]Rizzi, L. (Ed.). The Structure of CP and IP. The cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol 2[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004b.
[45]Schwabe, K. & S. Winkler (Eds.). On Information Structure, Meaning and Form[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007.
[46]Shlonsky, U. Beyond Functional Sequence [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
[47]Suarez, E. C. The Syntax-Information Structure Interface[M]. New York: Routledge, 2004.
[48]Tsai, W-T. Dylan. On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax-Semantics Interface [J]. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2001(10):129—168.
[49]von Fintel,K. Comments on Reinhart: the syntactic roots of discourse cohesion[A]. In H. Kamp & B. Partee(Eds.). Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning[C]. Amsterdam:Elsevier,2004:411—418.
[50]Williams,E. Representation Theory[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2003.
[51]何元建. 生成语言学背景下的汉语语法及翻译研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
[52]吕叔湘,朱德熙. 语法修辞讲话[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2013.
[53]袁毓林. 话题化及相关的语法过程[J]. 中国语文,1996(4):241—254.
[54]张连文. 句子主题的所指依存和信息结构层[J]. 四川外语学院学报,2006(4):66—71.
[55]张连文. 最简推导的严格循环与语段边界效应[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2013(6):1—10.
[56]张连文. 基于平行架构的接口制约与层次组合模型研究[J]. 广东外语外贸大学学报,2014(3):57—64.
[1] 邓昊熙. 《语段理论:导论》评介[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019, 41(1): 127-140.
[2] 赵永刚. 句法-音系的交互与汉语韵律层级理论研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2018, 40(2): 23-44.
[3] 陆俭明. 论当代语言学理论与外语教学的接口问题[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2018, 40(2): 3-20.
[4] 张连文. 语段动态拼读模式与线性化再分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2014, 36(6): 14-.